Use of sucralose in foods heated during manufacturing does not pose a risk to human health

J. Gujral, Jim Carr, D. Tonucci, C. Darwen, V. L. Grotz
{"title":"Use of sucralose in foods heated during manufacturing does not pose a risk to human health","authors":"J. Gujral, Jim Carr, D. Tonucci, C. Darwen, V. L. Grotz","doi":"10.1177/23978473211019490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulatory agencies around the world have found sucralose to be a safe ingredient for use in food. A recent review by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) hypothesized that sucralose use in foods heated during their manufacture might pose a health risk, by resulting in the formation of certain chlorinated compounds; specifically, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinateddibenzofurans (PCDFs) and/or free or bound 3-monochloropropanediol (3-MCPD), some of which are considered potential carcinogens. The BfR further encouraged the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which is in the process of conducting a staged re-evaluation of a range of food additives, including sucralose, to specifically address their hypothesis. This paper reports the results of new studies requested by EFSA to analyze for the presence of PCDDs, PCDFs and 3-MCPDs in a range of foods. As requested, foods were prepared with typical sucralose use levels and thermally processed under typical food processing conditions. The presence of the compounds of interest were analyzed using validated and accepted analytical methods (e.g. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); American Oil Chemists Society (AOCS)). The results of these new analytical studies show no evidence for the formation of these compounds due to sucralose presence. This paper also reports a critical analysis of the studies cited in the BfR review as the basis for its hypothesis. This analysis shows that the cited studies do not represent food manufacturing conditions and are thus not reliable for predicting the fate of sucralose in foods. This work reaffirms that sucralose is safe for use in food manufacture, including when heating is required.","PeriodicalId":23155,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research and Application","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23978473211019490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulatory agencies around the world have found sucralose to be a safe ingredient for use in food. A recent review by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) hypothesized that sucralose use in foods heated during their manufacture might pose a health risk, by resulting in the formation of certain chlorinated compounds; specifically, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinateddibenzofurans (PCDFs) and/or free or bound 3-monochloropropanediol (3-MCPD), some of which are considered potential carcinogens. The BfR further encouraged the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which is in the process of conducting a staged re-evaluation of a range of food additives, including sucralose, to specifically address their hypothesis. This paper reports the results of new studies requested by EFSA to analyze for the presence of PCDDs, PCDFs and 3-MCPDs in a range of foods. As requested, foods were prepared with typical sucralose use levels and thermally processed under typical food processing conditions. The presence of the compounds of interest were analyzed using validated and accepted analytical methods (e.g. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); American Oil Chemists Society (AOCS)). The results of these new analytical studies show no evidence for the formation of these compounds due to sucralose presence. This paper also reports a critical analysis of the studies cited in the BfR review as the basis for its hypothesis. This analysis shows that the cited studies do not represent food manufacturing conditions and are thus not reliable for predicting the fate of sucralose in foods. This work reaffirms that sucralose is safe for use in food manufacture, including when heating is required.
在生产过程中加热的食品中使用三氯蔗糖不会对人体健康构成风险
世界各地的监管机构都发现,三氯蔗糖是一种安全的食品成分。德国联邦风险评估研究所(BfR)最近的一项审查假设,在生产过程中加热的食品中使用三氯蔗糖可能会形成某些氯化化合物,从而对健康构成威胁;具体来说,多氯二苯并二恶英(pcdd)、多氯二苯并呋喃(pcdf)和/或游离或结合的3-一氯丙二醇(3-MCPD),其中一些被认为是潜在的致癌物。BfR进一步鼓励欧洲食品安全局(EFSA),该机构正在对包括三氯蔗糖在内的一系列食品添加剂进行分阶段重新评估,以明确证实他们的假设。本文报告了欧洲食品安全局要求对一系列食品中pcdd、pcdf和3- mcpd的存在进行分析的新研究结果。按照要求,以典型的三氯蔗糖使用水平制备食品,并在典型的食品加工条件下进行热处理。使用经过验证和公认的分析方法(例如美国环境保护署(EPA);美国石油化学学会(AOCS)。这些新的分析研究结果表明,没有证据表明这些化合物的形成是由于三氯蔗糖的存在。本文还对BfR综述中引用的研究进行了批判性分析,作为其假设的基础。这一分析表明,引用的研究不能代表食品生产条件,因此不能可靠地预测食品中三氯蔗糖的命运。这项工作重申,三氯蔗糖在食品生产中是安全的,包括在需要加热的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信