Effects of Surface Compound Layer on Bending Fatigue Strength of Nitrided Chromium-Molybdenum Steel

T. Kubota, O. Umezawa
{"title":"Effects of Surface Compound Layer on Bending Fatigue Strength of Nitrided Chromium-Molybdenum Steel","authors":"T. Kubota, O. Umezawa","doi":"10.4271/2019-32-0504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div class=\"section abstract\"><div class=\"htmlview paragraph\">Carburized and quenched materials with high fatigue strength are often used for motorcycle engine parts. Nitrided materials exhibit less deformation during heat treatment than carburized and quenched materials, so if the same or higher fatigue strength can be achieved with nitrided materials as with carburized and quenched materials, the geometric precision of parts can be increased and we can reduce engine noise as well as power loss. When the fatigue strengths of a nitrided material with its compound layer surface put into γ’ phase through nitriding potential control (hereafter, G), and a nitrided material put into ε phase (hereafter, E) were measured, the results showed the fatigue strength of the G to be about 11% higher than that of carburized and quenched materials. It was inferred that the strength of the compound layer determines fatigue strength. The reason the fatigue strength of the G is higher is that initial cracks do not readily form, and it can be inferred that when cracks do form, they progress readily and lead to final fracture. In the case of the E, it is thought that when the stress intensity factor, ΔK, due to initial cracks exceeds the threshold of the stress intensity factor range, ΔK<sub>th</sub> (<span class=\"formula inline\"><math id=\"M1\" display=\"inline\"><mo>≃</mo><mn>5.9</mn><mi mathvariant=\"normal\">M</mi><mi mathvariant=\"normal\">P</mi><mi mathvariant=\"normal\">a</mi><msqrt><mi>m</mi></msqrt></math></span>), it leads to fatigue fractures. While the G has higher fatigue strength than carburized and quenched materials, it is likely to have a big effect on microcrack fatigue strength. This is a factor we believe requires consideration when designing engine parts for strength and in planning part manufacturing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":87358,"journal":{"name":"SAE International journal of advances and current practices in mobility","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International journal of advances and current practices in mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-32-0504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carburized and quenched materials with high fatigue strength are often used for motorcycle engine parts. Nitrided materials exhibit less deformation during heat treatment than carburized and quenched materials, so if the same or higher fatigue strength can be achieved with nitrided materials as with carburized and quenched materials, the geometric precision of parts can be increased and we can reduce engine noise as well as power loss. When the fatigue strengths of a nitrided material with its compound layer surface put into γ’ phase through nitriding potential control (hereafter, G), and a nitrided material put into ε phase (hereafter, E) were measured, the results showed the fatigue strength of the G to be about 11% higher than that of carburized and quenched materials. It was inferred that the strength of the compound layer determines fatigue strength. The reason the fatigue strength of the G is higher is that initial cracks do not readily form, and it can be inferred that when cracks do form, they progress readily and lead to final fracture. In the case of the E, it is thought that when the stress intensity factor, ΔK, due to initial cracks exceeds the threshold of the stress intensity factor range, ΔKth (5.9MPam), it leads to fatigue fractures. While the G has higher fatigue strength than carburized and quenched materials, it is likely to have a big effect on microcrack fatigue strength. This is a factor we believe requires consideration when designing engine parts for strength and in planning part manufacturing.
表面复合层对氮化铬钼钢弯曲疲劳强度的影响
渗碳淬火材料通常用于摩托车发动机零件,具有较高的疲劳强度。与渗碳淬火材料相比,渗氮材料在热处理过程中表现出更少的变形,因此,如果渗氮材料能达到与渗碳淬火材料相同或更高的疲劳强度,就可以提高零件的几何精度,我们可以降低发动机的噪音和功率损失。通过控制渗氮电位使渗氮复合层表面进入γ′相(G)的渗氮材料和进入ε相(E)的渗氮材料的疲劳强度分别测定,结果表明,G相的渗氮材料的疲劳强度比渗碳淬火后的材料高11%左右。推测复合层的强度决定了复合层的疲劳强度。G的疲劳强度较高的原因是初始裂纹不易形成,由此可以推断,裂纹形成后,裂纹发展迅速,最终导致断裂。在E的情况下,当初始裂纹的应力强度因子ΔK超过应力强度因子范围的阈值ΔKth (5.9MPam)时,就会导致疲劳断裂。G具有比渗碳和淬火材料更高的疲劳强度,但可能对微裂纹疲劳强度有较大影响。这是我们认为在设计发动机零件的强度和计划零件制造时需要考虑的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信