Comparative Performance Evaluation for 1.2–10kV Conventional and Superjunction GaN Current Aperture Vertical Electron Transistors

M. Torky, Yanzhen Zhao, Panagiotis Lazos, T. Chow
{"title":"Comparative Performance Evaluation for 1.2–10kV Conventional and Superjunction GaN Current Aperture Vertical Electron Transistors","authors":"M. Torky, Yanzhen Zhao, Panagiotis Lazos, T. Chow","doi":"10.1002/pssa.202300305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance potentials and limits for GaN current aperture vertical electron transistors with conventional, doped, and natural polarization superjunction (PSJ) drift layers at 1.2–10 kV breakdown voltage (BV) ratings are quantitatively compared. The static and dynamic performance parameters for each device are simulated and extracted. The specific on‐resistance RON,sp and specific total charge QT,sp (defined as the sum of specific gate charge QG,sp and specific drain–source charge QDS,sp) are extracted from Medici technology computer‐aided design simulations representing both the static and dynamic performance respectively. Moreover, a developed figure‐of‐merit (FoM) (RON,sp · QT,sp) is used to quantitively compare the performance of these field‐effect transistors in the range of BV ratings. Compared to the doped superjunction (DSJ) and conventional CAVETs, natural PSJ CAVET exhibits 1%–60% and 70%–99% reduction in RON,sp, while it is 100 to 1000× reduction in QT,sp, at BV between 1.2 and 10 kV respectively. Simultaneously, 22%–80% and 80%–99% reduction in performance FoM respectively are found.","PeriodicalId":87717,"journal":{"name":"Physica status solidi (A): Applied research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica status solidi (A): Applied research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.202300305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance potentials and limits for GaN current aperture vertical electron transistors with conventional, doped, and natural polarization superjunction (PSJ) drift layers at 1.2–10 kV breakdown voltage (BV) ratings are quantitatively compared. The static and dynamic performance parameters for each device are simulated and extracted. The specific on‐resistance RON,sp and specific total charge QT,sp (defined as the sum of specific gate charge QG,sp and specific drain–source charge QDS,sp) are extracted from Medici technology computer‐aided design simulations representing both the static and dynamic performance respectively. Moreover, a developed figure‐of‐merit (FoM) (RON,sp · QT,sp) is used to quantitively compare the performance of these field‐effect transistors in the range of BV ratings. Compared to the doped superjunction (DSJ) and conventional CAVETs, natural PSJ CAVET exhibits 1%–60% and 70%–99% reduction in RON,sp, while it is 100 to 1000× reduction in QT,sp, at BV between 1.2 and 10 kV respectively. Simultaneously, 22%–80% and 80%–99% reduction in performance FoM respectively are found.
1.2-10kV常规和超结氮化镓电流孔径垂直电子晶体管的性能比较
在1.2 ~ 10 kV击穿电压(BV)额定值下,定量比较了传统、掺杂和自然极化超结(PSJ)漂移层氮化镓电流孔径垂直电子晶体管的性能潜力和极限。仿真并提取了各器件的静态和动态性能参数。从美第奇技术计算机辅助设计模拟中分别提取了代表静态和动态性能的比导通电阻RON,sp和比总电荷QT,sp(定义为比栅电荷QG,sp和比漏源电荷QDS,sp的总和)。此外,我们还采用了一种成熟的质量因数(FoM) (RON,sp·QT,sp)来定量比较这些场效应晶体管在BV额定值范围内的性能。与掺杂超结(DSJ)和传统CAVET相比,天然PSJ CAVET在1.2 ~ 10 kV的BV范围内,RON,sp分别降低了1% ~ 60%和70% ~ 99%,QT,sp分别降低了100 ~ 1000倍。同时,性能FoM分别降低22% ~ 80%和80% ~ 99%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信