Which psychology(ies) serves us best? Research perspectives on the psycho-cultural interface in the psychology of religion(s)

IF 0.8 3区哲学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie Pub Date : 2020-06-07 DOI:10.1177/0084672420926259

Adam Anczyk, H. Grzymała-Moszczyńska, Agnieszka Krzysztof-Świderska, Jacek Prusak

{"title":"Which psychology(ies) serves us best? Research perspectives on the psycho-cultural interface in the psychology of religion(s)","authors":"Adam Anczyk, H. Grzymała-Moszczyńska, Agnieszka Krzysztof-Świderska, Jacek Prusak","doi":"10.1177/0084672420926259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article concentrates on answering the main question to be addressed, as stated in its title: which psychology(ies) serves us best? In order to achieve this goal, we pursue possible answers in history of psychology of religion and its interdisciplinary relationships with its sister disciplines, anthropology of religion and religious studies, resulting with sketching a typology of the main attitudes towards conceptualising psycho-cultural interface, prevalent among psychologists: the Universalist, the Absolutist and the Relativist stances. Next chosen examples from the field of applied psychology are presented, as the role of the cultural factor within the history of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ (DSM) development is discussed alongside presenting research on the phenomenon of ‘hearing voices’, in order to show the marked way for the future – the importance of including the cultural factor in psychological research on religion.","PeriodicalId":44899,"journal":{"name":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672420926259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article concentrates on answering the main question to be addressed, as stated in its title: which psychology(ies) serves us best? In order to achieve this goal, we pursue possible answers in history of psychology of religion and its interdisciplinary relationships with its sister disciplines, anthropology of religion and religious studies, resulting with sketching a typology of the main attitudes towards conceptualising psycho-cultural interface, prevalent among psychologists: the Universalist, the Absolutist and the Relativist stances. Next chosen examples from the field of applied psychology are presented, as the role of the cultural factor within the history of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders’ (DSM) development is discussed alongside presenting research on the phenomenon of ‘hearing voices’, in order to show the marked way for the future – the importance of including the cultural factor in psychological research on religion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

哪种心理学对我们最有帮助?宗教心理学中心理-文化界面的研究视角

这篇文章集中于回答要解决的主要问题，正如其标题所述:哪种心理学对我们最有帮助?为了实现这一目标，我们在宗教心理学史及其与其姊妹学科——宗教人类学和宗教研究——的跨学科关系中寻求可能的答案，从而勾勒出心理学家对概念化心理文化界面的主要态度的类型学:普遍主义、绝对主义和相对主义立场。接下来从应用心理学领域中选择的例子，作为文化因素在精神疾病诊断和统计手册(DSM)发展历史中的作用，与对“幻听”现象的研究一起讨论，以显示未来的标志方式-在宗教心理学研究中包括文化因素的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie Multiple-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The international, peer-reviewed journal Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is the oldest periodical that publishes research in the psychology of religion. It is the organ of the International Association for the Psychology of Religion (IAPR), founded in 1914. The Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is open to all scientific methodologies, both quantitative and qualitative.