Comparison Between The Effectiveness of Lateral and Posterior Transversus Abdominis Plane Block by Using Bupivacaine After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.

Miraj Hossain, Major Muhammad Nazrul Islam, Zannatul Ferdous Happy, Moinul Hossain, A. Akhtaruzzaman
{"title":"Comparison Between The Effectiveness of Lateral and Posterior Transversus Abdominis Plane Block by Using Bupivacaine After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.","authors":"Miraj Hossain, Major Muhammad Nazrul Islam, Zannatul Ferdous Happy, Moinul Hossain, A. Akhtaruzzaman","doi":"10.3329/kyamcj.v13i2.61333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a regional anaesthetic technique used for postoperative pain management following abdominal surgery. Local anesthetics like bupivacaine can be used in this block and it can be performed in various approaches. Among them ultrasound-guided lateral and posterior approaches are popular.\nObjective: Aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of lateral and posterior approaches of ultrasound-guided TAP block using bupivacaine in the management of post-operative pain after total abdominal hysterectomy under subarachnoid anesthesia.\nMaterials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) Dhaka. Total 90 patients were scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy and assigned into two equal groups, group A and group B received ultrasound guided TAP block in lateral approach and in posterior approach respectively. Then patients were observed for pain intensity at rest and during deep breath by visual analog scale (VAS), after 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours of TAP block. The time of first analgesic demand was noted. Statistical analyses of the results were obtained by using window based computer software devised with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS-22).\nResults: The mean pain intensity at rest and during deep breath was statistically significant (p<0.05) at 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after TAP between two groups. The mean duration of first analgesic demand was 5.04±0.54 hours in group A and 6.59±0.69 hours in group B was statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups.\nConclusion: TAP block in posterior approach provided considerably effective postoperative analgesia in first 24 hours than lateral approach after total abdominal hysterectomy.\nKYAMC Journal Vol. 13, No. 02, July 2022: 66-71","PeriodicalId":17948,"journal":{"name":"KYAMC Journal","volume":"15 12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KYAMC Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/kyamcj.v13i2.61333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a regional anaesthetic technique used for postoperative pain management following abdominal surgery. Local anesthetics like bupivacaine can be used in this block and it can be performed in various approaches. Among them ultrasound-guided lateral and posterior approaches are popular. Objective: Aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of lateral and posterior approaches of ultrasound-guided TAP block using bupivacaine in the management of post-operative pain after total abdominal hysterectomy under subarachnoid anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) Dhaka. Total 90 patients were scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy and assigned into two equal groups, group A and group B received ultrasound guided TAP block in lateral approach and in posterior approach respectively. Then patients were observed for pain intensity at rest and during deep breath by visual analog scale (VAS), after 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours of TAP block. The time of first analgesic demand was noted. Statistical analyses of the results were obtained by using window based computer software devised with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS-22). Results: The mean pain intensity at rest and during deep breath was statistically significant (p<0.05) at 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours after TAP between two groups. The mean duration of first analgesic demand was 5.04±0.54 hours in group A and 6.59±0.69 hours in group B was statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. Conclusion: TAP block in posterior approach provided considerably effective postoperative analgesia in first 24 hours than lateral approach after total abdominal hysterectomy. KYAMC Journal Vol. 13, No. 02, July 2022: 66-71
布比卡因用于腹式全子宫切除术后腹横面阻滞的效果比较。
背景:腹横面阻滞(TAP)是一种用于腹部手术后疼痛管理的区域麻醉技术。像布比卡因这样的局部麻醉剂可以在这个街区使用,并且可以通过各种方式进行。其中超声引导下的外侧入路和后路是常用的入路。目的:比较超声引导下布比卡因侧路和后路TAP阻滞治疗蛛网膜下腔麻醉下全腹子宫切除术后疼痛的效果。材料与方法:本随机临床试验在达卡班班杜谢赫穆吉布医科大学(BSMMU)麻醉、镇痛和重症监护医学系进行。选择择期腹式全子宫切除术90例患者,随机分为两组,A组和B组分别行超声引导下外侧入路和后入路TAP阻滞。通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS)观察患者在TAP阻滞1小时、2小时、4小时、6小时、12小时和24小时后休息时和深呼吸时的疼痛强度。记录首次使用镇痛药的时间。采用SPSS-22 (Statistical Packages for Social Sciences)软件进行统计分析。结果:两组在TAP后4、6、12、24 h静息和深呼吸时的平均疼痛强度比较,差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。A组和B组患者首次镇痛需求平均持续时间分别为5.04±0.54 h和6.59±0.69 h,两组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:TAP阻滞在全腹子宫切除术后24小时内的镇痛效果明显优于外侧入路。KYAMC杂志第13卷,第02期,2022年7月:66-71
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信