Fatty acids profile and quality characteristics of broiler chicken meat fed different dietary oil sources with some additives

E. Zaki, A. Faham, Nematallah Gamal Mohmed
{"title":"Fatty acids profile and quality characteristics of broiler chicken meat fed different dietary oil sources with some additives","authors":"E. Zaki, A. Faham, Nematallah Gamal Mohmed","doi":"10.13130/2283-3927/9581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was carried out to investigate the effect of feeding broiler chicken on different vegetable oils with feed additives on the quality characteristics of chicken meat. A total of 216 one-day-old chicks of ( Hubbard ) strain were randomly assigned to six dietary treatments as (2×3) factorial designs where two sources of dietary oil with three levels of commercial multi-enzyme feed additives. Treatments were: soybean oil only (T1), soybean oil+ ZAD (T2), soybean oil+ AmPhi-BACT (T3), palm oil only (T4), palm oil + ZAD (T5) and palm oil + AmPhi- BACT (T6).  Results showed that feeding broiler chicken on different types of dietary oils had significant effect on the fatty acid profile of broiler chicken meat. UFA/SFA ration of broiler chicken groups (T4, T5adT6) were significantly lower compared with (T1, T2 and T3) groups. Broiler fed on soybean oil had significantly higher n-6: n-3 ration compared with broiler fed on palm oil. Regardless of the source of dietary oil, significant differences were observed in the most of fatty acid profile in the chicken meat among levels of commercial multi- enzyme feed additives. Meat of T5and T6 had the higher pH value, followed by meat of T1and T3 groups, while the lowest pH value found in meat of T2 and T4. The higher cooking loss was found in meat of T4 while, meat of T5had the lowest value. Data of chilling loss indicated that the differences between dietary treatments were not significantly different except for meat of T6 which had the higher chilling loss. No significant differences were found in color measurements between dietary treatments.","PeriodicalId":14105,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health, Animal science and Food safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health, Animal science and Food safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/2283-3927/9581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The study was carried out to investigate the effect of feeding broiler chicken on different vegetable oils with feed additives on the quality characteristics of chicken meat. A total of 216 one-day-old chicks of ( Hubbard ) strain were randomly assigned to six dietary treatments as (2×3) factorial designs where two sources of dietary oil with three levels of commercial multi-enzyme feed additives. Treatments were: soybean oil only (T1), soybean oil+ ZAD (T2), soybean oil+ AmPhi-BACT (T3), palm oil only (T4), palm oil + ZAD (T5) and palm oil + AmPhi- BACT (T6).  Results showed that feeding broiler chicken on different types of dietary oils had significant effect on the fatty acid profile of broiler chicken meat. UFA/SFA ration of broiler chicken groups (T4, T5adT6) were significantly lower compared with (T1, T2 and T3) groups. Broiler fed on soybean oil had significantly higher n-6: n-3 ration compared with broiler fed on palm oil. Regardless of the source of dietary oil, significant differences were observed in the most of fatty acid profile in the chicken meat among levels of commercial multi- enzyme feed additives. Meat of T5and T6 had the higher pH value, followed by meat of T1and T3 groups, while the lowest pH value found in meat of T2 and T4. The higher cooking loss was found in meat of T4 while, meat of T5had the lowest value. Data of chilling loss indicated that the differences between dietary treatments were not significantly different except for meat of T6 which had the higher chilling loss. No significant differences were found in color measurements between dietary treatments.
饲粮中添加不同油源和添加剂的肉鸡肉的脂肪酸分布及品质特性
本试验旨在研究不同植物油添加饲料添加剂对肉鸡肉质特性的影响。选取216只1日龄(Hubbard)品系雏鸡,按(2×3)因子设计随机分为6个饲粮处理,其中2个来源的饲粮油添加3个水平的市售多酶饲料添加剂。处理分别为:仅大豆油(T1)、大豆油+ ZAD (T2)、大豆油+ AmPhi-BACT (T3)、仅棕榈油(T4)、棕榈油+ ZAD (T5)和棕榈油+ AmPhi-BACT (T6)。结果表明,饲粮中添加不同类型的油脂对肉鸡肉质脂肪酸分布有显著影响。肉仔鸡(T4、T5adT6)组UFA/SFA比值显著低于(T1、T2和T3)组。大豆油饲粮的n-6∶n-3比显著高于棕榈油饲粮。无论饲粮油的来源如何,不同水平的多酶饲料添加剂在鸡肉中大多数脂肪酸分布上都有显著差异。t5和T6组肉质pH值最高,t1和T3组次之,T2和T4组肉质pH值最低。T4肉品蒸煮损失最大,t5肉品蒸煮损失最小。冷损数据表明,除T6肉品的冷损较高外,不同饲粮处理间差异不显著。不同饮食处理之间的颜色测量没有发现显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信