Comparative Study of the Mechanical Properties of Reduced Density Cements

A. Deshpande, P. Jones, Rahul Jadhav, Ganesh Shriniwas Pangu, V. Mishra
{"title":"Comparative Study of the Mechanical Properties of Reduced Density Cements","authors":"A. Deshpande, P. Jones, Rahul Jadhav, Ganesh Shriniwas Pangu, V. Mishra","doi":"10.2118/194918-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Cementing a casing string across weak formations or depleted reservoirs has the added challenge of tailoring the cement slurry to meet delivery criteria (i.e., density and rheology) while maintaining the mechanical properties of the set cement necessary to provide a dependable barrier. To help prevent fracturing the formation and inducing losses, cement density is often reduced, which strongly influences the mechanical properties of set cement. Common strategies for reducing cement density consist of adding water in the cement slurry; using additives such as hollow glass microspheres (HGS), synthetic latex, and elastomers; using foam cement; or adding resin. This paper discusses how cement slurries with reduced densities are designed using both traditional and alternative methods of making cement/resin composites and provides insight into the advantages and drawbacks of each.\n Stable cement slurries with a density of 13 lbm/gal were designed, and placement characteristics of thickening time and rheology were evaluated for the liquid cement slurry. Unconfined compressive strength (CS), Young's modulus (YM), tensile strength, permeability, and shear bond were investigated on the cured samples. Before taking mechanical and permeability measurements, slurry stability was verified using sedimentation testing. Any slurry that did not exhibit the necessary stability was redesigned and tested again. Only the final slurry designs exhibiting stability are discussed in this paper.\n Cement-resin composite cements exhibited similar performance to those containing HGS in terms of CS, YM, tensile strength, and shear bond but exhibited greater than two times the CS when compared to the synthetic latex modified, water-extended, and elastomeric slurry designs. The cement-resin composite provided almost twice the shear bond strength and increased tensile strength by 50% compared to other slurry compositions.\n In the current work, cement-resin composite, synthetic latex modified, microbead-based, water-extended, and elastomer-modified slurries are compared at 13 lbm/gal. Various parameters, such as mixability, ease of placement in the annulus, strength development, and long-term cement integrity, are evaluated. Traditional and newly introduced techniques for reducing cement slurry density and the resultant mechanical properties of the set solids are investigated. This information provides an alternate method of using cement-resin composites for designing and delivering dependable barriers tailored for low density applications.","PeriodicalId":10908,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194918-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Cementing a casing string across weak formations or depleted reservoirs has the added challenge of tailoring the cement slurry to meet delivery criteria (i.e., density and rheology) while maintaining the mechanical properties of the set cement necessary to provide a dependable barrier. To help prevent fracturing the formation and inducing losses, cement density is often reduced, which strongly influences the mechanical properties of set cement. Common strategies for reducing cement density consist of adding water in the cement slurry; using additives such as hollow glass microspheres (HGS), synthetic latex, and elastomers; using foam cement; or adding resin. This paper discusses how cement slurries with reduced densities are designed using both traditional and alternative methods of making cement/resin composites and provides insight into the advantages and drawbacks of each. Stable cement slurries with a density of 13 lbm/gal were designed, and placement characteristics of thickening time and rheology were evaluated for the liquid cement slurry. Unconfined compressive strength (CS), Young's modulus (YM), tensile strength, permeability, and shear bond were investigated on the cured samples. Before taking mechanical and permeability measurements, slurry stability was verified using sedimentation testing. Any slurry that did not exhibit the necessary stability was redesigned and tested again. Only the final slurry designs exhibiting stability are discussed in this paper. Cement-resin composite cements exhibited similar performance to those containing HGS in terms of CS, YM, tensile strength, and shear bond but exhibited greater than two times the CS when compared to the synthetic latex modified, water-extended, and elastomeric slurry designs. The cement-resin composite provided almost twice the shear bond strength and increased tensile strength by 50% compared to other slurry compositions. In the current work, cement-resin composite, synthetic latex modified, microbead-based, water-extended, and elastomer-modified slurries are compared at 13 lbm/gal. Various parameters, such as mixability, ease of placement in the annulus, strength development, and long-term cement integrity, are evaluated. Traditional and newly introduced techniques for reducing cement slurry density and the resultant mechanical properties of the set solids are investigated. This information provides an alternate method of using cement-resin composites for designing and delivering dependable barriers tailored for low density applications.
降密度水泥力学性能的比较研究
在薄弱地层或枯竭油藏中固井套管柱时,需要调整水泥浆以满足输送标准(即密度和流变性),同时保持固井水泥的机械性能,以提供可靠的屏障。为了防止地层破裂和漏失,通常会降低水泥密度,这对水泥固井的力学性能有很大影响。降低水泥密度的常用策略包括在水泥浆中加水;使用添加剂,如中空玻璃微珠(HGS)、合成乳胶和弹性体;采用泡沫水泥;或者加入树脂。本文讨论了如何使用传统和替代的水泥/树脂复合材料方法设计低密度水泥浆,并对每种方法的优缺点进行了深入分析。设计了密度为13 lbm/gal的稳定水泥浆,并对其稠化时间和流变性的放置特性进行了评价。研究了固化试样的无侧限抗压强度(CS)、杨氏模量(YM)、抗拉强度、渗透性和剪切粘结性。在进行力学和渗透率测量之前,通过沉降试验验证了泥浆的稳定性。任何没有表现出必要稳定性的浆液都被重新设计并再次测试。本文只讨论具有稳定性的最终浆料设计。水泥-树脂复合水泥在CS、YM、抗拉强度和剪切粘接方面表现出与含有HGS的水泥相似的性能,但与合成乳胶改性、水延伸和弹性体泥浆设计相比,其CS表现出两倍以上。与其他泥浆成分相比,水泥-树脂复合材料的抗剪强度几乎是其两倍,抗拉强度提高了50%。在目前的工作中,水泥-树脂复合材料、合成乳胶改性、微珠基、水延伸和弹性体改性的浆料在13 lbm/gal下进行了比较。评估了各种参数,如可混合性、在环空中放置的便利性、强度发展和水泥的长期完整性。研究了降低水泥浆密度的传统技术和新引入的技术,以及由此产生的固化固体的力学性能。这些信息提供了一种使用水泥-树脂复合材料设计和交付可靠的低密度屏障的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信