Subtraction of atmospheric water contribution in Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of biological membranes and proteins

Goormaghtigh Erik, Ruysschaert Jean-Marie
{"title":"Subtraction of atmospheric water contribution in Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of biological membranes and proteins","authors":"Goormaghtigh Erik,&nbsp;Ruysschaert Jean-Marie","doi":"10.1016/0584-8539(94)00167-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The contribution of the absorption of H<sub>2</sub>O vapor in the IR spectrum of proteins Interferes with the analysis of the shape of amide I and II bands and prevents correct assignments to be performed, in particular after Fourier self-deconvolution of the spectra Mathematical treatments of the spectra have previously been proposed to subtract the water vapor contribution from the sample spectrum. Here we propose to take advantage of the intrinsic bandwidth difference existing between the absorption bands of the water vapor and these of the liquid or solid sample. When a nominal resolution of 8 or 4 cm<sup>−1</sup> is chosen, atmospheric water bands are broad and rather featureless. The subtraction coefficient applied may vary by about 50% according to the operator. Conversely, when the spectrum of the same sample in the same conditions is recorded with a nominal resolution of 0.5 cm<sup>−1</sup>, subtraction coefficients are exactly evaluated by integration and the visual evaluation can not be mistaken by more than 5%. The very sharp features arising from imperfect matching between the atmospheric water band shapes in the reference and in the sample spectrum completely disappear if the difference spectrum is now convoluted to a final resolution of 4 cm<sup>−1</sup>. Incidence of the subtractions obtained at different resolutions on the evaluation of protein secondary structure is evaluated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":82782,"journal":{"name":"Spectrochimica acta. Part A: Molecular spectroscopy","volume":"50 12","pages":"Pages 2137-2144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0584-8539(94)00167-7","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectrochimica acta. Part A: Molecular spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0584853994001677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

The contribution of the absorption of H2O vapor in the IR spectrum of proteins Interferes with the analysis of the shape of amide I and II bands and prevents correct assignments to be performed, in particular after Fourier self-deconvolution of the spectra Mathematical treatments of the spectra have previously been proposed to subtract the water vapor contribution from the sample spectrum. Here we propose to take advantage of the intrinsic bandwidth difference existing between the absorption bands of the water vapor and these of the liquid or solid sample. When a nominal resolution of 8 or 4 cm−1 is chosen, atmospheric water bands are broad and rather featureless. The subtraction coefficient applied may vary by about 50% according to the operator. Conversely, when the spectrum of the same sample in the same conditions is recorded with a nominal resolution of 0.5 cm−1, subtraction coefficients are exactly evaluated by integration and the visual evaluation can not be mistaken by more than 5%. The very sharp features arising from imperfect matching between the atmospheric water band shapes in the reference and in the sample spectrum completely disappear if the difference spectrum is now convoluted to a final resolution of 4 cm−1. Incidence of the subtractions obtained at different resolutions on the evaluation of protein secondary structure is evaluated.

生物膜和蛋白质的傅里叶变换红外光谱中大气水贡献的减法
蛋白质红外光谱中水汽吸收的贡献干扰了对酰胺I和酰胺II波段形状的分析,并妨碍了正确的分配,特别是在光谱的傅里叶自反褶积之后,先前已经提出了对光谱进行数学处理以从样品光谱中减去水汽贡献。在这里,我们建议利用水蒸气和液体或固体样品的吸收带之间存在的固有带宽差异。当选择8或4 cm−1的标称分辨率时,大气水带很宽而且相当无特征。根据操作者的不同,所应用的减法系数可变化约50%。相反,当以0.5 cm−1的标称分辨率记录同一样品在相同条件下的光谱时,通过积分可以准确地评估减法系数,并且视觉评估的误差不会超过5%。如果差谱现在被卷积到最终分辨率为4 cm−1,则参考光谱和样品光谱中大气水带形状不完全匹配所产生的非常明显的特征将完全消失。在不同分辨率下获得的减法对蛋白质二级结构评价的发生率进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信