Distribution of clinical Candida species and their susceptibility to antifungal agents

Q3 Medicine
S. Tumer, M. Bayraktar, A. Öztürk
{"title":"Distribution of clinical Candida species and their susceptibility to antifungal agents","authors":"S. Tumer, M. Bayraktar, A. Öztürk","doi":"10.1097/MRM.0000000000000256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The incidence of fungal infections, especially by Candida species, has increased in recent years. This study was designed to isolate and identify Candida species from various clinical samples, and to examine their susceptibility to antifungal agents. Methods: A total of 175 Candida species were isolated from different clinical samples, and were identified using germ tube test, Cornmeal agar, and API C 20 AUX and VITEK 2 Compact Systems. Antifungal susceptibility of these isolates was determined using ATB Fungus 3 strip and VITEK 2 antifungal susceptibility cards. The results of these two methods were comparatively assessed. Results: A total of 175 Candida strains were isolated from 114 (65.1%) urine, 42 (24%) blood, eight (4.6%) sputum, seven (4%) endotracheal, and four (2.3%) wound samples. Of isolated Candida species, 102 (58.2%) were Candida albicans, 31 (17.6%) Candida tropicalis, 17 (9.6%) Candida parapsilosis, 13 (7.4%) Candida glabrata, three (1.8%) Candida kefyr, three (1.8%) Candida krusei, two (1.2%) Candida lusitaniae, and one (0.6%) Candida famata. By VITEK 2 antifungal susceptibility cards, the overall resistance rates were 0.6% to each of amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine, and 1.8% to fluconazole. In ATB Fungus 3 strip, the resistance (1.8%) was observed only to fulconazole. All isolates were uniformly susceptible to voriconazole in both methods. Conclusion: Valuable information and data on distribution and susceptibility of Candida strains were obtained. These data may be valuable from epidemiological point of view as well as for proper and optimal therapy of Candida infections in our region (Şanliurfa, Turkey).","PeriodicalId":49625,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Medical Microbiology","volume":"92 Suppl 2 1","pages":"176 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRM.0000000000000256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of fungal infections, especially by Candida species, has increased in recent years. This study was designed to isolate and identify Candida species from various clinical samples, and to examine their susceptibility to antifungal agents. Methods: A total of 175 Candida species were isolated from different clinical samples, and were identified using germ tube test, Cornmeal agar, and API C 20 AUX and VITEK 2 Compact Systems. Antifungal susceptibility of these isolates was determined using ATB Fungus 3 strip and VITEK 2 antifungal susceptibility cards. The results of these two methods were comparatively assessed. Results: A total of 175 Candida strains were isolated from 114 (65.1%) urine, 42 (24%) blood, eight (4.6%) sputum, seven (4%) endotracheal, and four (2.3%) wound samples. Of isolated Candida species, 102 (58.2%) were Candida albicans, 31 (17.6%) Candida tropicalis, 17 (9.6%) Candida parapsilosis, 13 (7.4%) Candida glabrata, three (1.8%) Candida kefyr, three (1.8%) Candida krusei, two (1.2%) Candida lusitaniae, and one (0.6%) Candida famata. By VITEK 2 antifungal susceptibility cards, the overall resistance rates were 0.6% to each of amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine, and 1.8% to fluconazole. In ATB Fungus 3 strip, the resistance (1.8%) was observed only to fulconazole. All isolates were uniformly susceptible to voriconazole in both methods. Conclusion: Valuable information and data on distribution and susceptibility of Candida strains were obtained. These data may be valuable from epidemiological point of view as well as for proper and optimal therapy of Candida infections in our region (Şanliurfa, Turkey).
临床念珠菌种类分布及其对抗真菌药物的敏感性
背景:近年来,真菌感染,尤其是念珠菌感染的发病率有所上升。本研究旨在从不同的临床样本中分离和鉴定念珠菌种类,并检测它们对抗真菌药物的敏感性。方法:从不同临床标本中分离到175株念珠菌,采用试管试验、玉米粉琼脂、API C 20 AUX和VITEK 2 Compact Systems进行鉴定。采用ATB Fungus 3试纸和VITEK 2抗真菌药敏卡检测菌株的抗真菌敏感性。对两种方法的结果进行了比较评价。结果:尿液114株(65.1%)、血液42株(24%)、痰液8株(4.6%)、气管内7株(4%)、伤口4株(2.3%)共分离到念珠菌175株。分离到的念珠菌中,白色念珠菌102株(58.2%),热带念珠菌31株(17.6%),假丝酵母菌17株(9.6%),光秃念珠菌13株(7.4%),克氏念珠菌3株(1.8%),克氏念珠菌3株(1.8%),卢西念珠菌2株(1.2%),famata念珠菌1株(0.6%)。VITEK 2抗真菌药敏卡对两性霉素B和5-氟胞嘧啶的总耐药率均为0.6%,对氟康唑的总耐药率为1.8%。ATB真菌3条仅对氟康唑耐药(1.8%)。两种方法对伏立康唑均敏感。结论:获得了有价值的念珠菌分布及药敏资料。从流行病学的角度来看,这些数据可能对我们地区念珠菌感染的适当和最佳治疗很有价值(Şanliurfa,土耳其)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Medical Microbiology
Reviews in Medical Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Medical Microbiology is a quarterly review journal which provides a balanced coverage of the whole field of medical microbiology. The Journal publishes state-of-the art reviews, mini-reviews, case presentations and original research from on-going research of the latest developments and techniques in medical microbiology, virology, mycology, parasitology, clinical microbiology, and hospital infection.​ In addition, PhD-Review - a platform for young researchers, and biographical Bio-Sketch articles are also considered. Reviews are concise, authoritative, and readable synthesis of the latest information on its subject, and references are limited to the fifty key sources for full reviews and twenty for mini-reviews. Reviews in Medical Microbiology is the perfect way for both qualified and trainee microbiologists, and researchers and clinicians with an interest in microbiology, to stay fully informed of the latest developments in medical microbiology. The journal is a valuable resource for educational and teaching purposes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信