Studies on Immunity of Experimental Typhoid

Kazuhisa Saito, M. Nakano, F. Okitsu, D. Ushiba
{"title":"Studies on Immunity of Experimental Typhoid","authors":"Kazuhisa Saito, M. Nakano, F. Okitsu, D. Ushiba","doi":"10.3412/JSB.17.797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When mice passively immunized with anti-O serum were challenged intravenously by virulent organisms of Salmonella enteritidis, a slight inhibition of bacterial multiplication could be observed only in the blood, and the bacteria in the liver and spleen multiplied as rapidly as in controls. The antilethal effect of the passive immunization was recognized only against an intravenous challenge with a small dose (5×10-7 mg) of bacteria.When challenge infection was carried out through the subcutaneous (10-4 mg bacteria) or per oral (2-4 mg) routes, no inhibition of bacterial multiplication was noted at all either inregional lymph nodes or in liver and spleen of the immunized mice.The hitherto obtained deta concerning the effect of killed vaccines in experimental typhoid of mice, which was shown to be antilethal only when immunized mice were challenged intraperitoneally, have been discussed with the above-mentioned results.Since the marked clearance phenomenon by antibodies could be observed only in the peritoneal cavity, it seemed reasonable to assume that an antilethal effect was obtained when the clearance was so extensive that very few bacteria could escape from loco to organs. On the contrary, after challenge through various routes other than peritoneal cavity, bacteria, not receiving marked “clearance” effects at loco, easily multiplied in organs of the immunized mice.","PeriodicalId":14812,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of bacteriology","volume":"140 1","pages":"797-801"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1962-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3412/JSB.17.797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

When mice passively immunized with anti-O serum were challenged intravenously by virulent organisms of Salmonella enteritidis, a slight inhibition of bacterial multiplication could be observed only in the blood, and the bacteria in the liver and spleen multiplied as rapidly as in controls. The antilethal effect of the passive immunization was recognized only against an intravenous challenge with a small dose (5×10-7 mg) of bacteria.When challenge infection was carried out through the subcutaneous (10-4 mg bacteria) or per oral (2-4 mg) routes, no inhibition of bacterial multiplication was noted at all either inregional lymph nodes or in liver and spleen of the immunized mice.The hitherto obtained deta concerning the effect of killed vaccines in experimental typhoid of mice, which was shown to be antilethal only when immunized mice were challenged intraperitoneally, have been discussed with the above-mentioned results.Since the marked clearance phenomenon by antibodies could be observed only in the peritoneal cavity, it seemed reasonable to assume that an antilethal effect was obtained when the clearance was so extensive that very few bacteria could escape from loco to organs. On the contrary, after challenge through various routes other than peritoneal cavity, bacteria, not receiving marked “clearance” effects at loco, easily multiplied in organs of the immunized mice.
实验性伤寒的免疫研究
当用抗o血清被动免疫小鼠静脉注射肠炎沙门氏菌毒力生物时,仅在血液中观察到细菌增殖的轻微抑制,肝脏和脾脏中的细菌增殖速度与对照组一样快。被动免疫的抗致死作用仅在静脉注射小剂量(5×10-7 mg)细菌时被确认。当通过皮下(10-4毫克细菌)或口服(2-4毫克)途径进行攻击感染时,在免疫小鼠的局部淋巴结或肝脏和脾脏中都没有发现细菌增殖的抑制。关于灭活疫苗在实验性小鼠伤寒中的作用,迄今为止已获得的资料表明,灭活疫苗只有在免疫小鼠腹腔攻击时才具有抗致死性,并与上述结果进行了讨论。由于抗体的明显清除现象只能在腹膜腔中观察到,因此似乎有理由认为,当清除如此广泛以至于很少有细菌能够从内脏逃到器官时,就获得了抗致死作用。相反,通过除腹腔以外的各种途径攻毒后,细菌在局部没有明显的“清除”作用,很容易在免疫小鼠的器官中繁殖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信