Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacology Service Efficiency in Terms of Outpatient Drug Supply in Nur-Sultan Medical Organization (Kazakhstan)

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
D. Utepova, R. Magzumova, D. Baidullayeva, M. Aljofan
{"title":"Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacology Service Efficiency in Terms of Outpatient Drug Supply in Nur-Sultan Medical Organization (Kazakhstan)","authors":"D. Utepova, R. Magzumova, D. Baidullayeva, M. Aljofan","doi":"10.32921/2225-9929-2021-4-44-50-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the study. Evaluate the clinical pharmacologist's contribution to the rational use of medications at the outpatient level.Methods. Clinical and economic analysis of budgetary expenditures on drugs purchased as part of the Guaranteed amount of free medical care and in the system of mandatory social health insurance (MSHI) for the period from 2019-2021. Assessment of the effectiveness of spending budgetary funds for drugs was conducted using data on the number and cost of drugs purchased to provide outpatient care in the medical organization of Nur-Sultan.Results. A three-year analysis showed a positive trend of a 7.1% decrease in the proportion of spending on unproven drugs (index N) by 2021 compared with the previous year 2020, which was 29.54% of spending on 13 drug items, despite the expansion of lists under insurance medicine. Before the introduction of mandatory social health insurance in 2019, this figure was 8.18% of all outpatient drug coverage costs in the Guaranteed amount of free medical care, indicating an average use of drugs not included in international clinical guidelines.Conclusions. The introduction of clinical pharmacology services into clinical practice has optimized the cost of drug therapy and promoted rational use of medications. The result is a 7.1% decrease in the share of spending on unproven drugs compared to the previous year 2020, which amounted to 29.54% of spending on 13 drugs (index N) not included in the Kazakhstan National Medical Formulary and the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. However, due to the long-term training of clinical pharmacologists, including basic education in therapeutic medicine (6-7 years) and additional education at the level of residency or doctoral studies (2-3 years), there is decreased motivation of clinical pharmacologists to work in budget medical organizations due to the \"low\" level of wages. Abroad, in particular, this problem was solved by the introduction of clinical pharmacy, where training includes basic pharmaceutical education (4-5 years) with the possibility of additional training at the master's level (1-2 years) and doctoral studies (2-3 years)","PeriodicalId":11852,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Health Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32921/2225-9929-2021-4-44-50-61","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study. Evaluate the clinical pharmacologist's contribution to the rational use of medications at the outpatient level.Methods. Clinical and economic analysis of budgetary expenditures on drugs purchased as part of the Guaranteed amount of free medical care and in the system of mandatory social health insurance (MSHI) for the period from 2019-2021. Assessment of the effectiveness of spending budgetary funds for drugs was conducted using data on the number and cost of drugs purchased to provide outpatient care in the medical organization of Nur-Sultan.Results. A three-year analysis showed a positive trend of a 7.1% decrease in the proportion of spending on unproven drugs (index N) by 2021 compared with the previous year 2020, which was 29.54% of spending on 13 drug items, despite the expansion of lists under insurance medicine. Before the introduction of mandatory social health insurance in 2019, this figure was 8.18% of all outpatient drug coverage costs in the Guaranteed amount of free medical care, indicating an average use of drugs not included in international clinical guidelines.Conclusions. The introduction of clinical pharmacology services into clinical practice has optimized the cost of drug therapy and promoted rational use of medications. The result is a 7.1% decrease in the share of spending on unproven drugs compared to the previous year 2020, which amounted to 29.54% of spending on 13 drugs (index N) not included in the Kazakhstan National Medical Formulary and the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. However, due to the long-term training of clinical pharmacologists, including basic education in therapeutic medicine (6-7 years) and additional education at the level of residency or doctoral studies (2-3 years), there is decreased motivation of clinical pharmacologists to work in budget medical organizations due to the "low" level of wages. Abroad, in particular, this problem was solved by the introduction of clinical pharmacy, where training includes basic pharmaceutical education (4-5 years) with the possibility of additional training at the master's level (1-2 years) and doctoral studies (2-3 years)
哈萨克斯坦努尔苏丹医疗机构门诊药物供应临床药理学服务效率的药物经济学评价
研究目的:评估临床药理学家对门诊合理用药的贡献。对2019-2021年期间作为免费医疗保障金额和强制性社会健康保险制度的一部分购买药品的预算支出进行临床和经济分析。利用努尔苏丹医疗机构为提供门诊服务而购买的药品数量和费用的数据,对预算资金用于药品支出的有效性进行了评估。一项为期三年的分析显示,尽管保险药品目录有所扩大,但到2021年,未验证药品(指数N)的支出比例与前一年2020年相比下降了7.1%,占13种药品支出的29.54%。在2019年引入强制性社会健康保险之前,这一数字占免费医疗保障金额中所有门诊药物覆盖费用的8.18%,表明国际临床指南中未包括的药物的平均使用情况。将临床药理学服务引入临床,优化了药物治疗成本,促进了药物的合理使用。其结果是,与前一年2020相比,未经证实的药物支出比例下降了7.1%,占未列入哈萨克斯坦国家药物处方集和世卫组织基本药物标准清单的13种药物(指数N)支出的29.54%。然而,由于临床药理学家的长期培训,包括治疗医学的基础教育(6-7年)和住院医师或博士研究水平的额外教育(2-3年),由于工资水平“低”,临床药理学家在预算医疗机构工作的动机降低。特别是在国外,这一问题通过引入临床药学得到了解决,临床药学的培训包括基础药学教育(4-5年),可能还包括硕士水平的额外培训(1-2年)和博士研究(2-3年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethiopian Journal of Health Development
Ethiopian Journal of Health Development PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development is a multi and interdisciplinary platform that provides space for public health experts in academics, policy and programs to share empirical evidence to contribute to health development agenda. We publish original research articles, reviews, brief communications and commentaries on public health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to the scholars in the field of public health, social sciences and humanities, health practitioners and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of public health from a wide range of fields: epidemiology, environmental health, health economics, reproductive health, behavioral sciences, nutrition, psychiatry, social pharmacy, medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychology and wide arrays of social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes the following types of contribution: 1) Peer-reviewed original research articles and critical or analytical reviews in any area of social public health. These papers may be up to 3,500 words excluding abstract, tables, and references. Papers below this limit are preferred. 2) Peer-reviewed short reports of research findings on topical issues or published articles of between 2000 and 4000 words. 3) Brief communications, and commentaries debating on particular areas of focus, and published alongside, selected articles. 4) Special Issues bringing together collections of papers on a particular theme, and usually guest edited. 5) Editorial that flags critical issues of public health debate for policy, program and scientific consumption or further debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信