A Combination between Synthetic Unit Hydrograph (SCS) and Rational Method in a similar Conditions Water Shed

Mona Fathi, Neveen B. Abelmageed, M. Hassan
{"title":"A Combination between Synthetic Unit Hydrograph (SCS) and Rational Method in a similar Conditions Water Shed","authors":"Mona Fathi, Neveen B. Abelmageed, M. Hassan","doi":"10.24203/ajet.v9i3.6622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studying watershed characteristics and choosing the most applicable methods to determine the amount of access rainfall that ran off is very important in many engineering applications, especially hydrology applications. That is to know the more suitable methods for protection against floods and to maximize benefits from the excess water. This study aims to establish a relation between the rational method and the SCS method. A subbasin in Wadi Dahab in Sinai, Egypt is investigated as a study area. To achieve the study aims, HEC-WMS software is chosen, which can analyze a watershed by using DEM and delineating basin. It calculates also important watershed parameters like area, runoff distances, and slope. The rainfall data is compiled and arranged. A statical analysis is executed to obtain the IDF curves. Hyfran-plus software is employed to locate the maximum depths for different return periods. Various values for the time of concentration are studied. It is concluded that the difference between the rational and SCS methods is great for the time of concentration till 2 hours, then it decreases obviously from 2 till 6 hours. Also, it is concluded that the difference between the two methods is bigger for the small return periods of 2 and 5 years for all values of the time of concentration. Employing the obtained equations, the peak runoff for one of the two methods (the rational and SCS methods) can be calculated knowing the time of concentration and the peak runoff for the second method.","PeriodicalId":8524,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24203/ajet.v9i3.6622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studying watershed characteristics and choosing the most applicable methods to determine the amount of access rainfall that ran off is very important in many engineering applications, especially hydrology applications. That is to know the more suitable methods for protection against floods and to maximize benefits from the excess water. This study aims to establish a relation between the rational method and the SCS method. A subbasin in Wadi Dahab in Sinai, Egypt is investigated as a study area. To achieve the study aims, HEC-WMS software is chosen, which can analyze a watershed by using DEM and delineating basin. It calculates also important watershed parameters like area, runoff distances, and slope. The rainfall data is compiled and arranged. A statical analysis is executed to obtain the IDF curves. Hyfran-plus software is employed to locate the maximum depths for different return periods. Various values for the time of concentration are studied. It is concluded that the difference between the rational and SCS methods is great for the time of concentration till 2 hours, then it decreases obviously from 2 till 6 hours. Also, it is concluded that the difference between the two methods is bigger for the small return periods of 2 and 5 years for all values of the time of concentration. Employing the obtained equations, the peak runoff for one of the two methods (the rational and SCS methods) can be calculated knowing the time of concentration and the peak runoff for the second method.
综合单元线与理性方法在相似条件下的结合
研究流域特征,选择最适用的方法来确定流域的径流量在许多工程应用中,特别是在水文应用中是非常重要的。那就是了解更合适的防洪方法,并最大限度地利用多余的水。本研究旨在建立理性方法与SCS方法之间的关系。以埃及西奈瓦迪达哈卜的一个次盆地为研究区。为了达到研究目的,选择了HEC-WMS软件,该软件可以利用DEM和圈定流域对流域进行分析。它还计算重要的流域参数,如面积、径流距离和坡度。编制和整理雨量资料。进行了统计分析,得到了IDF曲线。hyran -plus软件用于定位不同回潮期的最大深度。研究了浓缩时间的不同取值。结果表明:合理方法与SCS方法在浓度≤2h时差异较大,在浓度≤2h时差异明显减小。在2年和5年的小回归期,两种方法之间的差异更大。利用所得到的方程,在知道浓度时间和第二种方法的峰值流量的情况下,可以计算出两种方法(理性方法和SCS方法)中的一种方法的峰值流量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信