Exploring Community-based Research Values and Principles: Lessons Learned from a Delphi Study

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jenny Francis, M. Yan, H. Gill
{"title":"Exploring Community-based Research Values and Principles: Lessons Learned from a Delphi Study","authors":"Jenny Francis, M. Yan, H. Gill","doi":"10.5130/IJCRE.V11I1.5584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community-based research (CBR) is a relatively new methodology characterised by the co-generation of knowledge. As CBR is integrated into institutional frameworks, it becomes increasingly important to understand what differentiates CBR from other research. To date, there has been no systematic study of CBR values and principles, which tend to be offered as a list of considerations that are taken as given rather than problematised. Similarly, research has not explored the ways in which understandings of CBR's underlying values differ among individual researchers compared to the broader research values of a large university. In this article, we report the findings of a Delphi study which addresses these gaps through a systematic, cross-disciplinary survey of CBR researchers at a large Canadian research university. Our findings indicate diverse and complex understandings of both the potentially political nature of CBR and the perceived values of the respondents' institution.","PeriodicalId":53967,"journal":{"name":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/IJCRE.V11I1.5584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Community-based research (CBR) is a relatively new methodology characterised by the co-generation of knowledge. As CBR is integrated into institutional frameworks, it becomes increasingly important to understand what differentiates CBR from other research. To date, there has been no systematic study of CBR values and principles, which tend to be offered as a list of considerations that are taken as given rather than problematised. Similarly, research has not explored the ways in which understandings of CBR's underlying values differ among individual researchers compared to the broader research values of a large university. In this article, we report the findings of a Delphi study which addresses these gaps through a systematic, cross-disciplinary survey of CBR researchers at a large Canadian research university. Our findings indicate diverse and complex understandings of both the potentially political nature of CBR and the perceived values of the respondents' institution.
探索基于社区的研究价值和原则:从德尔菲研究中吸取的教训
基于社区的研究(CBR)是一种相对较新的研究方法,其特点是知识的共同产生。随着CBR被纳入制度框架,理解CBR与其他研究的区别变得越来越重要。迄今为止,还没有对CBR的价值和原则进行系统的研究,这些价值和原则往往是作为一份考虑因素清单提供的,被视为既定的,而不是有问题的。同样,研究也没有探讨个体研究人员对CBR潜在价值的理解与大型大学更广泛的研究价值的不同之处。在本文中,我们报告了德尔菲研究的结果,该研究通过对加拿大一所大型研究型大学的CBR研究人员进行系统的跨学科调查来解决这些差距。我们的研究结果表明,对于CBR的潜在政治性质和受访者所在机构的感知价值,人们的理解既多样又复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
5
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信