Flying high: pilot peer coaching to champion well-being and mitigate hazardous attitudes

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Nick Goodwyn, N. Beech, B. Garvey, J. Gold, R. Gulliford, Tricia Auty, Ali Sajjadi, Adalberto Arrigoni, Nehal Mahtab, Simon Jones, Susan Beech
{"title":"Flying high: pilot peer coaching to champion well-being and mitigate hazardous attitudes","authors":"Nick Goodwyn, N. Beech, B. Garvey, J. Gold, R. Gulliford, Tricia Auty, Ali Sajjadi, Adalberto Arrigoni, Nehal Mahtab, Simon Jones, Susan Beech","doi":"10.1108/ejtd-09-2021-0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe “Germanwings” air crash in 2015 in which 150 people were killed highlighted the challenges pilots working in the aviation industry face. Pilots regularly work for extensive periods in inhospitable and high-pressure operational conditions, exposing them to considerable work-related stress. This has raised calls for a more systemic cultural change across the aviation industry, championing a more holistic perspective of pilot health and well-being. The study aims to explore how peer coaching (PC) can promote an inclusive psychosocial safety climate enhancing pilot well-being and can mitigate hazardous attitudes and dysfunctional behaviours.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAdopting an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were conducted with military and civilian peer coach/coachee pilots and key industry stakeholders, totalling 39 participants. The research provided significant insights into the perceived value of PC in promoting both pilot health and mental well-being (MW) and flight safety across the aviation industry.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study highlights four key PC superordinate themes, namely, coaching skills, significance of well-being, building of peer relationships and importance of confidentiality and autonomy. Such combined themes build reciprocal trust within peer conversations that can inspire engagement and effectively promote personal well-being. The contagious effect of such local interventions can help stimulate systemic cultural change and promote a positive psychosocial safety climate throughout an organisation and, in this case, across the aviation industry. This study provides a PC conceptual framework “Mutuality Equality Goals Autonomy Non-evaluative feedback, Skill Confidentiality Voluntary Supervisory (MEGANS CVS),” highlighting the salient features of PC in promoting MW.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study highlights the salient features of PC and its role in promoting peer conversations that enable personal transition, openness and acceptance. This study also highlights how PC and well-being can be used to encourage inclusivity and engagement, thereby strengthening institutional resilience.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study highlights how PC that can assist HRM/HRD professionals to embed a more inclusive and salutogenic approach to MW that can reshape organisational cultures. This study highlights the significance and link of workplace stress to hazardous attitudes and dysfunctional behaviours. It further notes that whilst the MEGANS CVS peer coaching framework has been applied to pilots, it can also be applied across all sectors and levels.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis study highlights the value of PC as an inexpensive means to engage at the grassroots level, which not only improves personal performance, safety and well-being but by building peer relationships can also act as a catalyst for positive and deep organisational cultural change.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study offers the MEGANS CVS framework that exposes insights into PC practice that can assist HRM/HRD professionals embed a more inclusive and salutogenic approach to health and well-being that can reshape organisational cultures. This study highlights the significance and link of workplace stress to hazardous attitudes and dysfunctional behaviours, and whilst this framework has been applied to pilots, it can also have relevance across all sectors and levels. This study calls for a “salutogenic turn,” employing MW and PC to transform organisational capabilities to be more forward-thinking and solution-focused, promoting an inclusive “just culture” where leaders positively lead their people.\n","PeriodicalId":46786,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Training and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Training and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-09-2021-0136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The “Germanwings” air crash in 2015 in which 150 people were killed highlighted the challenges pilots working in the aviation industry face. Pilots regularly work for extensive periods in inhospitable and high-pressure operational conditions, exposing them to considerable work-related stress. This has raised calls for a more systemic cultural change across the aviation industry, championing a more holistic perspective of pilot health and well-being. The study aims to explore how peer coaching (PC) can promote an inclusive psychosocial safety climate enhancing pilot well-being and can mitigate hazardous attitudes and dysfunctional behaviours. Design/methodology/approach Adopting an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were conducted with military and civilian peer coach/coachee pilots and key industry stakeholders, totalling 39 participants. The research provided significant insights into the perceived value of PC in promoting both pilot health and mental well-being (MW) and flight safety across the aviation industry. Findings The study highlights four key PC superordinate themes, namely, coaching skills, significance of well-being, building of peer relationships and importance of confidentiality and autonomy. Such combined themes build reciprocal trust within peer conversations that can inspire engagement and effectively promote personal well-being. The contagious effect of such local interventions can help stimulate systemic cultural change and promote a positive psychosocial safety climate throughout an organisation and, in this case, across the aviation industry. This study provides a PC conceptual framework “Mutuality Equality Goals Autonomy Non-evaluative feedback, Skill Confidentiality Voluntary Supervisory (MEGANS CVS),” highlighting the salient features of PC in promoting MW. Research limitations/implications The study highlights the salient features of PC and its role in promoting peer conversations that enable personal transition, openness and acceptance. This study also highlights how PC and well-being can be used to encourage inclusivity and engagement, thereby strengthening institutional resilience. Practical implications This study highlights how PC that can assist HRM/HRD professionals to embed a more inclusive and salutogenic approach to MW that can reshape organisational cultures. This study highlights the significance and link of workplace stress to hazardous attitudes and dysfunctional behaviours. It further notes that whilst the MEGANS CVS peer coaching framework has been applied to pilots, it can also be applied across all sectors and levels. Social implications This study highlights the value of PC as an inexpensive means to engage at the grassroots level, which not only improves personal performance, safety and well-being but by building peer relationships can also act as a catalyst for positive and deep organisational cultural change. Originality/value This study offers the MEGANS CVS framework that exposes insights into PC practice that can assist HRM/HRD professionals embed a more inclusive and salutogenic approach to health and well-being that can reshape organisational cultures. This study highlights the significance and link of workplace stress to hazardous attitudes and dysfunctional behaviours, and whilst this framework has been applied to pilots, it can also have relevance across all sectors and levels. This study calls for a “salutogenic turn,” employing MW and PC to transform organisational capabilities to be more forward-thinking and solution-focused, promoting an inclusive “just culture” where leaders positively lead their people.
高飞:试点同伴指导,以维护福祉和减轻有害的态度
2015年造成150人死亡的“德国之翼”空难凸显了航空业飞行员面临的挑战。飞行员经常在恶劣和高压的操作条件下长时间工作,使他们面临相当大的工作压力。这引发了对整个航空业进行更系统性文化变革的呼吁,倡导对飞行员的健康和福祉进行更全面的看待。本研究旨在探讨同伴指导(PC)如何促进包容性的社会心理安全氛围,提高飞行员的幸福感,并减轻危险态度和功能失调行为。设计/方法/方法采用解释性现象学分析(IPA),对军事和民用同行教练/教练员飞行员和主要行业利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈和问卷调查,共有39名参与者。该研究对个人电脑在促进整个航空业飞行员健康和心理健康(MW)以及飞行安全方面的感知价值提供了重要见解。研究结果强调了四个关键的PC上级主题,即指导技巧、幸福感的重要性、同伴关系的建立以及保密和自主的重要性。这样的组合主题在同伴对话中建立了相互信任,可以激发参与并有效地促进个人福祉。这种地方干预的传染效应有助于刺激系统性文化变革,并在整个组织(在这种情况下是整个航空业)中促进积极的社会心理安全氛围。本研究提出了“互惠、平等、目标、自主、非评估性反馈、技能、保密、自愿监督(MEGANS CVS)”的个人电脑概念框架,突出个人电脑在促进个人电脑学习方面的显著特征。研究局限/启示本研究强调了个人电脑的显著特征及其在促进同伴对话方面的作用,这些对话能够促进个人的转变、开放和接受。本研究还强调了如何利用个人电脑和幸福感来鼓励包容性和参与度,从而加强制度弹性。实际意义本研究强调了PC如何能够帮助人力资源管理/人力资源开发专业人员嵌入一种更具包容性和有益的方法,以重塑组织文化。本研究强调了工作场所压力与危险态度和功能失调行为之间的重要性和联系。它进一步指出,虽然梅根CVS同行指导框架已应用于试点,但它也可以应用于所有部门和级别。社会意义本研究强调了个人电脑作为一种廉价的基层参与手段的价值,它不仅可以提高个人绩效、安全和福祉,而且通过建立同伴关系,还可以作为积极和深刻的组织文化变革的催化剂。原创性/价值本研究提供了MEGANS CVS框架,揭示了个人电脑实践的见解,可以帮助人力资源管理/人力资源开发专业人员嵌入更具包容性和有益的健康和福祉方法,从而重塑组织文化。这项研究强调了工作场所压力与危险态度和功能失调行为之间的重要性和联系,虽然这一框架已应用于试点,但它也适用于所有部门和层面。这项研究呼吁进行“有益的转变”,即利用领导力和个人电脑将组织能力转变为更具前瞻性和以解决方案为中心的能力,促进包容性的“公正文化”,在这种文化中,领导者积极领导他们的员工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信