Kai kurių statybos terminų vartosena: teorijos ir praktikos neatitiktis

Lina Rutkienė
{"title":"Kai kurių statybos terminų vartosena: teorijos ir praktikos neatitiktis","authors":"Lina Rutkienė","doi":"10.3846/COACTIVITY.2010.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern society technical skills and competence are highly valued. The process of technologisation affects changes in language because the development of language is closely related to changes in society. Language becomes technical since humans constantly expose themselves to technical realia and their denominations. Yet, not always the widespread terms denoting technical concepts are grammatically acceptable. The main objectives of this article are the following: to analyse certain ad hoc selected terms used in the field of construction by use of questionnaires; to discuss the causes of ungrammatical use of the terms; to estimate the predominant role of linguistic or extralinguistic factors; to test and compare the degree of grammatically correct use of the terms by IV year students and employees of the construction sector.","PeriodicalId":53267,"journal":{"name":"Santalka Filosofija Komunikacija","volume":"20 1","pages":"93-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Santalka Filosofija Komunikacija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/COACTIVITY.2010.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In modern society technical skills and competence are highly valued. The process of technologisation affects changes in language because the development of language is closely related to changes in society. Language becomes technical since humans constantly expose themselves to technical realia and their denominations. Yet, not always the widespread terms denoting technical concepts are grammatically acceptable. The main objectives of this article are the following: to analyse certain ad hoc selected terms used in the field of construction by use of questionnaires; to discuss the causes of ungrammatical use of the terms; to estimate the predominant role of linguistic or extralinguistic factors; to test and compare the degree of grammatically correct use of the terms by IV year students and employees of the construction sector.
在现代社会,技术技能和能力受到高度重视。技术的进程影响着语言的变化,因为语言的发展与社会的变化密切相关。由于人类不断地将自己暴露在技术现实和它们的名称中,语言变得技术化了。然而,并不总是表示技术概念的广泛术语在语法上是可接受的。本文的主要目的是:通过问卷调查的方式,对建筑领域中使用的一些特别选择术语进行分析;讨论术语不合语法使用的原因;判断:估计语言或语言外因素的主要作用;测试和比较四年级学生和建筑行业员工对术语的语法正确使用程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信