The risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting between surgical patients received propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia: A matched study

Hideki Matsuura, Satoki Inoue, Masahiko Kawaguchi
{"title":"The risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting between surgical patients received propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia: A matched study","authors":"Hideki Matsuura,&nbsp;Satoki Inoue,&nbsp;Masahiko Kawaguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.aat.2016.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The current consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) suggest that one of anesthetic risk factors is the use of volatile anesthetics. However, in clinical settings, it is rare to perceive propofol to be superior to volatile anesthetics for the prevention of PONV. To assess whether PONV is related to the type of anesthetic delivered, we compared the incidence and duration of PONV between propofol anesthesia and sevoflurane anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective review of an institutional registry containing 21606 general anesthesia cases conducted following ethics board approval. Anesthesia for all patients was managed with propofol or sevoflurane. To avoid channeling bias, a propensity score analysis was used to generate a set of matched cases (propofol anesthesia) and controls (sevoflurane anesthesia), yielding 2554 matched patient pairs. The incidence and sustained rate of symptoms were compared as the primary outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the unmatched population, a higher incidence of PONV occurred following propofol anesthesia compared to sevoflurane anesthesia (propofol vs. sevoflurane anesthesia: 18.9% vs. 15.3%, respectively, p &lt; 0.0001). The sustained rate of PONV over the course after propofol anesthesia was also higher than that following sevoflurane anesthesia (p &lt; 0.001). Conversely, less PONV occurred after propofol compared to sevoflurane after propensity matching (propofol vs. sevoflurane anesthesia: 20.4% vs. 23.3%, respectively, p = 0.01). However, the sustained rate of PONV over the course after propofol anesthesia did not differ from that following sevoflurane anesthesia (p = 0.09).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Propofol could decrease the incidence of PONV compared with sevoflurane, although the duration of PONV was not affected as found in previous reports.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87042,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","volume":"54 4","pages":"Pages 114-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aat.2016.09.002","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875459716300042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Objectives

The current consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) suggest that one of anesthetic risk factors is the use of volatile anesthetics. However, in clinical settings, it is rare to perceive propofol to be superior to volatile anesthetics for the prevention of PONV. To assess whether PONV is related to the type of anesthetic delivered, we compared the incidence and duration of PONV between propofol anesthesia and sevoflurane anesthesia.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of an institutional registry containing 21606 general anesthesia cases conducted following ethics board approval. Anesthesia for all patients was managed with propofol or sevoflurane. To avoid channeling bias, a propensity score analysis was used to generate a set of matched cases (propofol anesthesia) and controls (sevoflurane anesthesia), yielding 2554 matched patient pairs. The incidence and sustained rate of symptoms were compared as the primary outcomes.

Results

In the unmatched population, a higher incidence of PONV occurred following propofol anesthesia compared to sevoflurane anesthesia (propofol vs. sevoflurane anesthesia: 18.9% vs. 15.3%, respectively, p < 0.0001). The sustained rate of PONV over the course after propofol anesthesia was also higher than that following sevoflurane anesthesia (p < 0.001). Conversely, less PONV occurred after propofol compared to sevoflurane after propensity matching (propofol vs. sevoflurane anesthesia: 20.4% vs. 23.3%, respectively, p = 0.01). However, the sustained rate of PONV over the course after propofol anesthesia did not differ from that following sevoflurane anesthesia (p = 0.09).

Conclusions

Propofol could decrease the incidence of PONV compared with sevoflurane, although the duration of PONV was not affected as found in previous reports.

异丙酚和七氟醚麻醉手术患者术后恶心和呕吐的风险:一项匹配研究
目的:目前关于术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)管理的共识指南表明,麻醉危险因素之一是使用挥发性麻醉剂。然而,在临床环境中,很少有人认为异丙酚在预防PONV方面优于挥发性麻醉剂。为了评估PONV是否与麻醉类型有关,我们比较了异丙酚麻醉和七氟醚麻醉的PONV发生率和持续时间。方法:我们对经伦理委员会批准的21606例全身麻醉病例进行了回顾性分析。所有患者均使用异丙酚或七氟醚麻醉。为了避免通道偏差,使用倾向评分分析生成一组匹配的病例(异丙酚麻醉)和对照组(七氟醚麻醉),产生2554对匹配的患者。将症状的发生率和持续率作为主要结局进行比较。结果在未匹配人群中,异丙酚麻醉后PONV的发生率高于七氟醚麻醉(异丙酚与七氟醚麻醉分别为18.9%和15.3%,p <0.0001)。异丙酚麻醉后PONV的持续发生率也高于七氟醚麻醉后(p <0.001)。相反,与七氟醚相比,异丙酚麻醉后PONV发生率较低(异丙酚与七氟醚麻醉分别为20.4%和23.3%,p = 0.01)。然而,在整个过程中,异丙酚麻醉后PONV的持续率与七氟醚麻醉后没有差异(p = 0.09)。结论与七氟醚相比,异丙酚可降低PONV的发生率,但不影响PONV的持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信