BOS4c.003 Advance care plans: creation, content and use during wave 1 of the COVID-19 pandemic

P. McFarlane, Catey Bunce, K. Sleeman, M. Orlovic, J. Koffman, J. Rosling, A. Bearne, M. Powell, J. Riley, J. Droney
{"title":"BOS4c.003 Advance care plans: creation, content and use during wave 1 of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"P. McFarlane, Catey Bunce, K. Sleeman, M. Orlovic, J. Koffman, J. Rosling, A. Bearne, M. Powell, J. Riley, J. Droney","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-acp.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundMortality forecasts associated with COVID-19 stressed a need to prepare adults with advanced disease for possible severe illness and engage with Advance Care Planning (ACP). We aimed to examine ACP engagement and activity during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA retrospective cohort study, comparing the creation, content and use of Coordinate My Care (CMC) records in London prior to and during the onset of COVID-19. Records for people aged 18+, created and published in pre-pandemic period (2018–2019) and ‘wave 1' (W1) of COVID-19 (20/03/20–04/07/20) were extracted. Demographics, ACP-related content and the use of CMC records created were analysed and compared using descriptive statistics.Results56,343 records were included, 35,108 from the pre-pandemic period and 21,235 records from W1. The average records created each week rose by 296.9% (P<0.005) in W1. There were fewer records in W1 for those aged 80 years (60.8% vs 64.9% pre-pandemic, P<0.005) and who had WHO performance status 4 (34.8% vs 44.2% pre pandemic, P<0.005). More people who created records during W1 had an estimated prognosis of 1 year+ (73.3% vs 53.0% pre-pandemic, P<0.005), were ‘For Resuscitation' (38.2% vs 29.8% pre-pandemic, P<0.005) and had a Treatment Ceiling of ‘Full Active Treatment' (32.4% vs 25.7%, P<0.005). More people in W1 listed hospital as their preferred place of care (PPC) and preferred place of death (PPD) (PPC: 13.3% vs 5.8% pre-pandemic, P<0.005. PPD: 14.0% vs 7.9%, P<0.005). Average monthly non-urgent and urgent record views rose by 320.3% (P=0.02) and 154.3% (P=0.01) in W1.ConclusionsA large uptake in engagement with ACP is demonstrated during the 1st wave of the pandemic. An increase in use among younger, more independent patients with longer prognoses, with a higher preference for hospital care creating records in W1 compared to before the pandemic, suggests heightened awareness and provision of ACP at this time.","PeriodicalId":19692,"journal":{"name":"Oral abstracts","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-acp.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMortality forecasts associated with COVID-19 stressed a need to prepare adults with advanced disease for possible severe illness and engage with Advance Care Planning (ACP). We aimed to examine ACP engagement and activity during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA retrospective cohort study, comparing the creation, content and use of Coordinate My Care (CMC) records in London prior to and during the onset of COVID-19. Records for people aged 18+, created and published in pre-pandemic period (2018–2019) and ‘wave 1' (W1) of COVID-19 (20/03/20–04/07/20) were extracted. Demographics, ACP-related content and the use of CMC records created were analysed and compared using descriptive statistics.Results56,343 records were included, 35,108 from the pre-pandemic period and 21,235 records from W1. The average records created each week rose by 296.9% (P<0.005) in W1. There were fewer records in W1 for those aged 80 years (60.8% vs 64.9% pre-pandemic, P<0.005) and who had WHO performance status 4 (34.8% vs 44.2% pre pandemic, P<0.005). More people who created records during W1 had an estimated prognosis of 1 year+ (73.3% vs 53.0% pre-pandemic, P<0.005), were ‘For Resuscitation' (38.2% vs 29.8% pre-pandemic, P<0.005) and had a Treatment Ceiling of ‘Full Active Treatment' (32.4% vs 25.7%, P<0.005). More people in W1 listed hospital as their preferred place of care (PPC) and preferred place of death (PPD) (PPC: 13.3% vs 5.8% pre-pandemic, P<0.005. PPD: 14.0% vs 7.9%, P<0.005). Average monthly non-urgent and urgent record views rose by 320.3% (P=0.02) and 154.3% (P=0.01) in W1.ConclusionsA large uptake in engagement with ACP is demonstrated during the 1st wave of the pandemic. An increase in use among younger, more independent patients with longer prognoses, with a higher preference for hospital care creating records in W1 compared to before the pandemic, suggests heightened awareness and provision of ACP at this time.
BOS4c。003预先护理计划:在COVID-19大流行第一波期间的创建、内容和使用
背景:与COVID-19相关的死亡率预测强调,有必要让患有晚期疾病的成年人为可能的严重疾病做好准备,并参与预先护理计划(ACP)。我们的目的是检查ACP在COVID-19大流行期间的参与和活动。方法采用回顾性队列研究,比较伦敦地区在COVID-19发病前和发病期间CMC记录的创建、内容和使用情况。提取了在大流行前(2018-2019)和COVID-19“第一波”(20/03/20-04/07/20)创建和发布的18岁以上人群的记录。使用描述性统计分析和比较人口统计、非加太相关内容和CMC记录的使用情况。结果共纳入记录56,343份,其中大流行前记录35,108份,W1记录21,235份。W1周平均记录数上升296.9% (P<0.005)。80岁老人(60.8% vs .大流行前的64.9%,P<0.005)和具有who绩效等级4的人(34.8% vs .大流行前的44.2%,P<0.005)的W1记录较少。在W1期间创造记录的更多患者的估计预后为1年以上(73.3%比大流行前的53.0%,P<0.005),“复苏”(38.2%比大流行前的29.8%,P<0.005),治疗上限为“充分积极治疗”(32.4%比25.7%,P<0.005)。W1中更多的人将医院列为首选护理地点(PPC)和首选死亡地点(PPD) (PPC: 13.3% vs大流行前的5.8%,P<0.005。PPD: 14.0% vs 7.9%, P<0.005)。W1的月平均非紧急和紧急记录浏览量分别上升了320.3% (P=0.02)和154.3% (P=0.01)。结论在流感大流行的第一波期间,ACP得到了大量应用。与大流行之前相比,更年轻、更独立、预后较长的患者使用ACP的情况有所增加,更倾向于在W1中创建医院护理记录,这表明目前ACP的认识和提供得到了提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信