T. Thangarajah, C. Pendegrass, S. Shahbazi, S. Lambert, S. Alexander, G. Blunn
{"title":"TENDON REATTACHMENT USING DEMINERALISED BONE MATRIX AND MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS","authors":"T. Thangarajah, C. Pendegrass, S. Shahbazi, S. Lambert, S. Alexander, G. Blunn","doi":"10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.01485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Re-attachment of tendon to bone is challenging with surgical repair failing in up to 90% of cases. Poor biological healing is common and characterised by the formation of weak scar tissue. Previous work has demonstrated that decellularised allogenic demineralised bone matrix (DBM) regenerates a physiologic enthesis. Xenografts offer a more cost-effective option but concerns over their immunogenicity have been raised. We hypothesised that augmentation of a healing tendon-bone interface with DBM incorporated with autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) would result in improved function, and restoration of the native enthesis, with no difference between xenogenic and allogenic scaffolds. Methods Using an ovine model of tendon-bone retraction the patellar tendon was detached and a complete distal tendon defect measuring 1 cm was created. Suture anchors were used to reattach the shortened tendon and xenogenic DBM + MSCs (n=5) and allogenic DBM + MSCs (n=5) were used to bridge the defect. Functional recovery was assessed every 3 weeks and DBM incorporation into the tendon and its effect on enthesis regeneration was measured using histomorphometry. Results By 12 weeks, DBM augmentation resulted in significantly improved functional weight bearing with no failures in either group. Compared to xenogenic DBM, allogenic DBM was associated with significantly higher functional weight bearing at 6 (P=0.047), 9 (P=0.028) and 12 weeks (P=0.009). This was accompanied by a more direct type of enthesis characterised by significantly more fibrocartilage and mineralised fibrocartilage. Xenograft was also associated with an immunogenic reaction despite preoperative decellularisation. Conclusion This study shows that DBM enhances tendon-bone healing and may reduce the high failure rates associated with surgery. An immunogenic reaction, and inferior biomechanical and histological results were also associated with the use of xenograft. Allogenic DBM with autologous MSCs may be a suitable scaffold for the enhancement of tendon-bone healing in the clinical setting. Disclosures Funded by IKC PoC grant awarded by the University of Leeds Ethical approval Granted by the study institution (University College London)","PeriodicalId":15048,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","volume":"58 1","pages":"42-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.01485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Re-attachment of tendon to bone is challenging with surgical repair failing in up to 90% of cases. Poor biological healing is common and characterised by the formation of weak scar tissue. Previous work has demonstrated that decellularised allogenic demineralised bone matrix (DBM) regenerates a physiologic enthesis. Xenografts offer a more cost-effective option but concerns over their immunogenicity have been raised. We hypothesised that augmentation of a healing tendon-bone interface with DBM incorporated with autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) would result in improved function, and restoration of the native enthesis, with no difference between xenogenic and allogenic scaffolds. Methods Using an ovine model of tendon-bone retraction the patellar tendon was detached and a complete distal tendon defect measuring 1 cm was created. Suture anchors were used to reattach the shortened tendon and xenogenic DBM + MSCs (n=5) and allogenic DBM + MSCs (n=5) were used to bridge the defect. Functional recovery was assessed every 3 weeks and DBM incorporation into the tendon and its effect on enthesis regeneration was measured using histomorphometry. Results By 12 weeks, DBM augmentation resulted in significantly improved functional weight bearing with no failures in either group. Compared to xenogenic DBM, allogenic DBM was associated with significantly higher functional weight bearing at 6 (P=0.047), 9 (P=0.028) and 12 weeks (P=0.009). This was accompanied by a more direct type of enthesis characterised by significantly more fibrocartilage and mineralised fibrocartilage. Xenograft was also associated with an immunogenic reaction despite preoperative decellularisation. Conclusion This study shows that DBM enhances tendon-bone healing and may reduce the high failure rates associated with surgery. An immunogenic reaction, and inferior biomechanical and histological results were also associated with the use of xenograft. Allogenic DBM with autologous MSCs may be a suitable scaffold for the enhancement of tendon-bone healing in the clinical setting. Disclosures Funded by IKC PoC grant awarded by the University of Leeds Ethical approval Granted by the study institution (University College London)