Mutual socialization during shared media moments: U.S. LGBTQ teens and their parents negotiate identity support

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Marie-Louise Mares, YuChing Chen, Bradley J. Bond
{"title":"Mutual socialization during shared media moments: U.S. LGBTQ teens and their parents negotiate identity support","authors":"Marie-Louise Mares, YuChing Chen, Bradley J. Bond","doi":"10.1093/joc/jqac046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Social relational theory proposes that children and parents socialize each other, particularly when knowledge, beliefs, and identities diverge. For families with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ) teens, identity-relevant media depictions may spark moments of mutual socialization, including attempts to mediate each other’s viewing and discussions of the teen’s identity. U.S. data from 200 LGBTQ teens (aged 13–18) and one of their parents indicated that 83% of dyads reported that media content had elicited identity-related conversations. Both teens and parents perceived teens to mediate more often than parents, though latent profile analyses suggested distinct dyadic profiles. Although all teens were out to their parent, those with more identity certainty engaged in and received more frequent mediation. For parents, the frequency and positivity of “media moments” were associated with greater support for their teen’s identity. For teens, positivity (but not frequency) of such moments was associated with perceptions of more parental support for their identity.","PeriodicalId":53925,"journal":{"name":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social relational theory proposes that children and parents socialize each other, particularly when knowledge, beliefs, and identities diverge. For families with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ) teens, identity-relevant media depictions may spark moments of mutual socialization, including attempts to mediate each other’s viewing and discussions of the teen’s identity. U.S. data from 200 LGBTQ teens (aged 13–18) and one of their parents indicated that 83% of dyads reported that media content had elicited identity-related conversations. Both teens and parents perceived teens to mediate more often than parents, though latent profile analyses suggested distinct dyadic profiles. Although all teens were out to their parent, those with more identity certainty engaged in and received more frequent mediation. For parents, the frequency and positivity of “media moments” were associated with greater support for their teen’s identity. For teens, positivity (but not frequency) of such moments was associated with perceptions of more parental support for their identity.
在共享媒体时刻的相互社会化:美国LGBTQ青少年和他们的父母协商身份支持
社会关系理论认为,孩子和父母相互交往,特别是在知识、信仰和身份不同的时候。对于有女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿(LGBTQ)青少年的家庭来说,与身份相关的媒体描述可能会引发相互社会化的时刻,包括试图调解彼此对青少年身份的看法和讨论。来自200名LGBTQ青少年(13-18岁)和他们的一位父母的美国数据表明,83%的夫妻表示媒体内容引发了与身份相关的对话。青少年和父母都认为青少年比父母更经常地进行调解,尽管潜在剖面分析表明了不同的二元剖面。虽然所有的青少年都向父母出柜,但那些身份更确定的青少年参与并接受更频繁的调解。对于父母来说,“媒体时刻”的频率和积极性与他们对孩子身份认同的更多支持有关。对于青少年来说,这种时刻的积极性(而不是频率)与父母对他们身份的更多支持有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信