‘Perticular Or Particular? In Search of When English Calvinistic Baptists Became Particular Baptists’

Q4 Arts and Humanities
W. Brackney
{"title":"‘Perticular Or Particular? In Search of When English Calvinistic Baptists Became Particular Baptists’","authors":"W. Brackney","doi":"10.1080/0005576X.2021.2001963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The terminology ‘Particular Baptist’ has been employed by early and contemporary writers to denominate English Calvinistic Baptists since Thomas Crosby's published history in 1738–40. However, upon closer scrutiny of original manuscripts, the terminology ‘Particular Baptists’ did not come into usage until the 1680s. Instead of Particular Baptists being defined by a limited view of Christ's atonement (i.e. for a particular group), the earliest Calvinistic Baptists created a theological identity built upon their doctrine of the church, as articulated in the London Confession of 1644. This essay surveys key writers and documents to demonstrate a two-stage theological development that focussed initially upon particular congregations, and later upon classic Calvinistic principles such as election, predestination, and perseverance. Gradually the ‘Particular Baptist’ nomenclature came into use to denote the English Calvinistic Baptists in contrast to general atonement or Arminian Baptists. In the period 1640–1680, the preferred terminology is simply Calvinistic Baptists.","PeriodicalId":39857,"journal":{"name":"The Baptist quarterly","volume":"87 6 1","pages":"101 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Baptist quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0005576X.2021.2001963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The terminology ‘Particular Baptist’ has been employed by early and contemporary writers to denominate English Calvinistic Baptists since Thomas Crosby's published history in 1738–40. However, upon closer scrutiny of original manuscripts, the terminology ‘Particular Baptists’ did not come into usage until the 1680s. Instead of Particular Baptists being defined by a limited view of Christ's atonement (i.e. for a particular group), the earliest Calvinistic Baptists created a theological identity built upon their doctrine of the church, as articulated in the London Confession of 1644. This essay surveys key writers and documents to demonstrate a two-stage theological development that focussed initially upon particular congregations, and later upon classic Calvinistic principles such as election, predestination, and perseverance. Gradually the ‘Particular Baptist’ nomenclature came into use to denote the English Calvinistic Baptists in contrast to general atonement or Arminian Baptists. In the period 1640–1680, the preferred terminology is simply Calvinistic Baptists.
“特别还是特别?”英国加尔文派浸信会教徒何时成为特殊浸信会教徒
自1738 - 1740年托马斯·克罗斯比(Thomas Crosby)出版历史以来,早期和当代作家一直使用“特信浸信会”一词来称呼英国加尔文主义浸信会教徒。然而,仔细研究原始手稿,“特殊浸信会”这个术语直到1680年代才开始使用。早期的加尔文主义浸信会教徒并没有被定义为基督赎罪的有限观点(即为一个特定的群体),而是在他们的教会教义的基础上建立了一种神学身份,正如1644年伦敦信条所阐述的那样。这篇文章调查了一些重要的作者和文献,以展示一个两个阶段的神学发展,最初集中在特定的教会,后来集中在经典的加尔文主义原则,如拣选,预定和毅力。渐渐地,“特殊浸信会”的命名法开始用于表示英国加尔文主义浸信会,与一般赎罪或阿民念主义浸信会形成对比。在1640-1680年间,人们更喜欢用加尔文浸信会这个术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Baptist quarterly
The Baptist quarterly Arts and Humanities-History
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信