Application of machine learning tools for feature selection in the identification of prognostic markers in COVID-19

Q3 Mathematics
Sprockel Diaz Johm Jaime, Hector Fabio Restrepo Guerrero, J. J. Fernández
{"title":"Application of machine learning tools for feature selection in the identification of prognostic markers in COVID-19","authors":"Sprockel Diaz Johm Jaime, Hector Fabio Restrepo Guerrero, J. J. Fernández","doi":"10.1515/em-2022-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective To identify prognostic markers by applying machine learning strategies to the feature selection. Methods An observational, retrospective, multi-center study that included hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 in three hospitals in Colombia. Eight strategies were applied to select prognostic-related characteristics. Eight logistic regression models were built from each set of variables and the predictive ability of the outcome was evaluated. The primary endpoint was transfer to intensive care or in-hospital death. Results The database consisted of 969 patients of which 486 had complete data. The main outcome occurred in 169 cases. The development database included 220 patients, 137 (62.3%) were men with a median age of 58.2, 39 (17.7%) were diabetic, 62 (28.2%) had high blood pressure, and 32 (14.5%) had chronic lung disease. Thirty-three variables were identified as prognostic markers, and those selected most frequently were: LDH, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, CRP, age, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, ferritin, and HCO3. The eight logistic regressions developed were validated on 266 patients in whom similar results were reached (accuracy: 65.8–72.9%). Conclusions The combined use of strategies for selecting characteristics through machine learning techniques makes it possible to identify a broad set of prognostic markers in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 for death or hospitalization in intensive care.","PeriodicalId":37999,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Methods","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2022-0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective To identify prognostic markers by applying machine learning strategies to the feature selection. Methods An observational, retrospective, multi-center study that included hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 in three hospitals in Colombia. Eight strategies were applied to select prognostic-related characteristics. Eight logistic regression models were built from each set of variables and the predictive ability of the outcome was evaluated. The primary endpoint was transfer to intensive care or in-hospital death. Results The database consisted of 969 patients of which 486 had complete data. The main outcome occurred in 169 cases. The development database included 220 patients, 137 (62.3%) were men with a median age of 58.2, 39 (17.7%) were diabetic, 62 (28.2%) had high blood pressure, and 32 (14.5%) had chronic lung disease. Thirty-three variables were identified as prognostic markers, and those selected most frequently were: LDH, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, CRP, age, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, ferritin, and HCO3. The eight logistic regressions developed were validated on 266 patients in whom similar results were reached (accuracy: 65.8–72.9%). Conclusions The combined use of strategies for selecting characteristics through machine learning techniques makes it possible to identify a broad set of prognostic markers in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 for death or hospitalization in intensive care.
机器学习工具特征选择在COVID-19预后标志物识别中的应用
摘要目的将机器学习策略应用于特征选择,识别预后标志物。方法采用观察性、回顾性、多中心研究,纳入哥伦比亚三家医院确诊为COVID-19的住院患者。采用八种策略选择预后相关特征。对每组变量建立8个logistic回归模型,并对结果的预测能力进行评价。主要终点是转入重症监护或院内死亡。结果共纳入969例患者,其中486例资料完整。169例发生主要结局。发展数据库包括220例患者,137例(62.3%)为男性,中位年龄为58.2岁,39例(17.7%)为糖尿病患者,62例(28.2%)为高血压患者,32例(14.5%)为慢性肺病患者。33个变量被确定为预后指标,其中最常被选择的是:LDH、PaO2/FIO2比值、CRP、年龄、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数、呼吸频率、氧饱和度、铁蛋白和HCO3。建立的8个logistic回归对266例患者进行了验证,结果相似(准确率:65.8-72.9%)。结论:通过机器学习技术联合使用选择特征的策略,可以在因COVID-19住院死亡或住院重症监护的患者中识别一系列广泛的预后标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Methods
Epidemiologic Methods Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Methods (EM) seeks contributions comparable to those of the leading epidemiologic journals, but also invites papers that may be more technical or of greater length than what has traditionally been allowed by journals in epidemiology. Applications and examples with real data to illustrate methodology are strongly encouraged but not required. Topics. genetic epidemiology, infectious disease, pharmaco-epidemiology, ecologic studies, environmental exposures, screening, surveillance, social networks, comparative effectiveness, statistical modeling, causal inference, measurement error, study design, meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信