SURVIVAL TREE SCORE: A NOVEL APPROACH TO PREDICT MORTALITY IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS

Q4 Medicine
S. Basto, E. M. Nascimento, B. B. Pereira, J. Ribeiro Filho, R. Perez, Cristiane Alves Vilella Nogueira
{"title":"SURVIVAL TREE SCORE: A NOVEL APPROACH TO PREDICT MORTALITY IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS","authors":"S. Basto, E. M. Nascimento, B. B. Pereira, J. Ribeiro Filho, R. Perez, Cristiane Alves Vilella Nogueira","doi":"10.28951/rbb.v38i4.464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is adopted worldwide for liver transplant allocation, but it has prognostic limitations. The aim of this study was to apply the survival tree analysis to evaluate interaction between variables related to mortality in cirrhotics patients enlisted for liver transplantation, and to develop a new mortality predictive score. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of cirrhotic patients waiting for liver transplantation during a 12-year period were considered. Charts from 765 patients were reviewed. The interaction between prognostic covariates was obtained using a survival tree analysis. In order to develop the predictive score, Cox regression analysis was performed applying significant data obtained by the survival tree analysis. The prognostic covariates evaluated in the survival tree were MELD score, Child-Pugh score, serum sodium, viral disease etiology, hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and generated a coefficient for each. Based on the survival tree analysis, MELD = 15 was the primary root variable (p<0.001). The survival tree provided eight prognostic groups. The higher mortality hazard ratio (HR) risk was observed in the MELD >28 group (HR= 16.7).  The new score (Survival Tree Score – STS) was obtained according to the coefficients provided. The STS prognostic performance was superior to MELD score (AUROC 0.713 vs 0.653, p<0.001). STS, could be a useful tool to accurately identify individual mortality risk in advanced liver disease.","PeriodicalId":36293,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Biometria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Biometria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28951/rbb.v38i4.464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is adopted worldwide for liver transplant allocation, but it has prognostic limitations. The aim of this study was to apply the survival tree analysis to evaluate interaction between variables related to mortality in cirrhotics patients enlisted for liver transplantation, and to develop a new mortality predictive score. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of cirrhotic patients waiting for liver transplantation during a 12-year period were considered. Charts from 765 patients were reviewed. The interaction between prognostic covariates was obtained using a survival tree analysis. In order to develop the predictive score, Cox regression analysis was performed applying significant data obtained by the survival tree analysis. The prognostic covariates evaluated in the survival tree were MELD score, Child-Pugh score, serum sodium, viral disease etiology, hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and generated a coefficient for each. Based on the survival tree analysis, MELD = 15 was the primary root variable (p<0.001). The survival tree provided eight prognostic groups. The higher mortality hazard ratio (HR) risk was observed in the MELD >28 group (HR= 16.7).  The new score (Survival Tree Score – STS) was obtained according to the coefficients provided. The STS prognostic performance was superior to MELD score (AUROC 0.713 vs 0.653, p<0.001). STS, could be a useful tool to accurately identify individual mortality risk in advanced liver disease.
生存树评分:预测肝硬化患者死亡率的新方法
虽然终末期肝病模型(Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, MELD)评分在全球范围内被用于肝移植分配,但其存在预后局限性。本研究的目的是应用生存树分析来评估肝硬化患者肝移植死亡率相关变量之间的相互作用,并开发一种新的死亡率预测评分。我们考虑了12年间等待肝移植的肝硬化患者的人口学、临床和实验室数据。回顾了765例患者的图表。预后协变量之间的相互作用通过生存树分析得到。为了建立预测评分,应用生存树分析获得的显著性数据进行Cox回归分析。生存树中评估的预后协变量为MELD评分、Child-Pugh评分、血清钠、病毒性疾病病因学、肝细胞癌诊断,并为每个协变量生成系数。根据生存树分析,MELD = 15是主要的根变量(p28组(HR= 16.7))。根据提供的系数得到新的评分(生存树评分- STS)。STS预后优于MELD评分(AUROC 0.713 vs 0.653, p<0.001)。STS可能是准确识别晚期肝病患者个体死亡风险的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Biometria
Revista Brasileira de Biometria Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信