{"title":"Un verano difícil en la historia del Partido Nacional uruguayo (1931)","authors":"Carolina Cerrano, J. Saravia","doi":"10.25185/11.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article investigates a temporary limited period, the summer of 1931, but with great significance to the Uruguayan National Party, since it would define its rupture and field of action during the next three decades. The active media participation in the nationalist debate of its most popular leader, Luis Alberto de Herrera, constitutes one of the main points of analysis. Herrera had been the defeated candidate in the last three presidential campaigns (1922, 1926 and 1930) and was constituted for part of the leadership as the symbol of party failure. On the contrary, he cautiously showed that the adherence of most of the party mass insisted on him as a «guide». During those months, nationalism witnessed a tense division that surprised itself and its adversaries, so in this work, a meticulous reconstruction of the discussions is carried out that allows to understand why the wounds of that internal battle, product of the unexpected electoral defeat of November 1930, would be very difficult to heal.","PeriodicalId":52962,"journal":{"name":"Humanidades","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25185/11.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
: This article investigates a temporary limited period, the summer of 1931, but with great significance to the Uruguayan National Party, since it would define its rupture and field of action during the next three decades. The active media participation in the nationalist debate of its most popular leader, Luis Alberto de Herrera, constitutes one of the main points of analysis. Herrera had been the defeated candidate in the last three presidential campaigns (1922, 1926 and 1930) and was constituted for part of the leadership as the symbol of party failure. On the contrary, he cautiously showed that the adherence of most of the party mass insisted on him as a «guide». During those months, nationalism witnessed a tense division that surprised itself and its adversaries, so in this work, a meticulous reconstruction of the discussions is carried out that allows to understand why the wounds of that internal battle, product of the unexpected electoral defeat of November 1930, would be very difficult to heal.
本文调查了一个暂时的有限时期,即1931年夏天,但对乌拉圭国民党具有重要意义,因为它将确定其在接下来的三十年中的分裂和行动领域。媒体积极参与其最受欢迎的领导人路易斯·阿尔贝托·德·埃雷拉(Luis Alberto de Herrera)的民族主义辩论,构成了分析的主要观点之一。埃雷拉在过去的三次总统竞选(1922年、1926年和1930年)中都是落选的候选人,他被认为是党内失败的象征。相反,他谨慎地表明,党内大多数人坚持把他当作“向导”。在那几个月里,民族主义见证了一场令自己和对手都感到惊讶的紧张分裂,因此在这本书中,作者对讨论进行了细致的重建,以便理解为什么1930年11月意外选举失败所造成的内部斗争的创伤将很难愈合。