Communication ethics for online social movements: A study on Arab social networks on Twitter

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Asma H. Malkawi, Khamis Ambusaidi
{"title":"Communication ethics for online social movements: A study on Arab social networks on Twitter","authors":"Asma H. Malkawi, Khamis Ambusaidi","doi":"10.1386/jammr_00027_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media increasingly play a role in transforming activist movements in the Arab world into digital forms. This study examines the link between adherence of network members to digital communication ethics and the level of the movements’ success based on the conceptual grounding in communication theories of Jürgen Habermas and Taha Abdurrahman. We tried to evaluate the link between the success of online social movement actors and their ethical contents by asking: What are the ethical implications of online social movements that do succeed in actualizing their goals? Do social network users discuss communication ethics to agree on terms of use within these movements? What are the important issues of communicative action and challenges of rational discussion in Arab social media use? We used two case studies: the hashtag #with_the_teacher launched to support teachers’ rights in Jordan in 2019, and a Twitter network of Arab users discussing digital communication ethics. We used mixed-methods and case studies approaches; data collected from Twitter were analysed using social network analysis followed by qualitative content analysis. Key findings demonstrate positive effects of activists’ engagement in social networks, and that commitment to digital communication ethics, whether stemming from secular or religious frames of reference, is significant for the success of online social movements. The case of #with_the_teacher network proved itself to be an example of successful digital protest and ideal model for rational ethical communication. Content analysis revealed that teachers formed a social network that exhibited strong solidarity and cohesion, and relied – perhaps unconsciously – on rules and principles of ethical discussion, including truthfulness, credibility, transparency, respect, accuracy and responsibility. Content analysis of the ‘communication ethics’ network demonstrated that the majority of content was religiously oriented, produced mainly by religious figures, educational institutions, or accounts with pseudonyms that are influential by the sheer number of their followers.","PeriodicalId":36098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"117-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr_00027_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social media increasingly play a role in transforming activist movements in the Arab world into digital forms. This study examines the link between adherence of network members to digital communication ethics and the level of the movements’ success based on the conceptual grounding in communication theories of Jürgen Habermas and Taha Abdurrahman. We tried to evaluate the link between the success of online social movement actors and their ethical contents by asking: What are the ethical implications of online social movements that do succeed in actualizing their goals? Do social network users discuss communication ethics to agree on terms of use within these movements? What are the important issues of communicative action and challenges of rational discussion in Arab social media use? We used two case studies: the hashtag #with_the_teacher launched to support teachers’ rights in Jordan in 2019, and a Twitter network of Arab users discussing digital communication ethics. We used mixed-methods and case studies approaches; data collected from Twitter were analysed using social network analysis followed by qualitative content analysis. Key findings demonstrate positive effects of activists’ engagement in social networks, and that commitment to digital communication ethics, whether stemming from secular or religious frames of reference, is significant for the success of online social movements. The case of #with_the_teacher network proved itself to be an example of successful digital protest and ideal model for rational ethical communication. Content analysis revealed that teachers formed a social network that exhibited strong solidarity and cohesion, and relied – perhaps unconsciously – on rules and principles of ethical discussion, including truthfulness, credibility, transparency, respect, accuracy and responsibility. Content analysis of the ‘communication ethics’ network demonstrated that the majority of content was religiously oriented, produced mainly by religious figures, educational institutions, or accounts with pseudonyms that are influential by the sheer number of their followers.
网络社会运动的传播伦理:基于Twitter的阿拉伯社会网络研究
社交媒体在将阿拉伯世界的激进运动转化为数字形式方面发挥着越来越大的作用。本研究基于j根·哈贝马斯(rgen Habermas)和塔哈·阿卜杜拉曼(Taha Abdurrahman)传播理论的概念基础,探讨了网络成员对数字传播伦理的遵守与运动成功程度之间的联系。我们试图通过以下问题来评估在线社会运动参与者的成功与其道德内容之间的联系:成功实现其目标的在线社会运动的道德含义是什么?在这些运动中,社交网络用户是否讨论沟通伦理来同意使用条款?在阿拉伯社会媒体的使用中,沟通行动的重要议题和理性讨论的挑战是什么?我们使用了两个案例研究:2019年在约旦为支持教师权利而推出的#与老师在一起#标签,以及讨论数字通信道德的阿拉伯用户Twitter网络。我们使用混合方法和案例研究方法;从Twitter收集的数据使用社交网络分析和定性内容分析进行分析。主要研究结果表明,积极分子参与社交网络的积极影响,以及对数字通信伦理的承诺,无论是源于世俗的还是宗教的参考框架,对在线社会运动的成功至关重要。#with_the_teacher网络的案例证明了它本身是一个成功的数字抗议的例子,也是理性道德沟通的理想模式。内容分析显示,教师形成了一个社会网络,表现出强烈的团结和凝聚力,并且(也许是无意识地)依赖于道德讨论的规则和原则,包括真实、可信、透明、尊重、准确和责任。对“传播伦理”网络的内容分析表明,大多数内容都是宗教导向的,主要由宗教人物、教育机构或因其追随者数量庞大而具有影响力的假名账户制作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信