Minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (a systematic review and meta-analysis)

S. B. Kozyreva, I. Kostarev, L. Blagodarny, V. V. Polovinkin, A. Zakharyan, A. Titov
{"title":"Minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (a systematic review and meta-analysis)","authors":"S. B. Kozyreva, I. Kostarev, L. Blagodarny, V. V. Polovinkin, A. Zakharyan, A. Titov","doi":"10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-149-159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: to estimate the effectiveness of minimally invasive methods for treatment of chronic inflammation in pilonidal sinus disease by systematic review.PATIENTS AND METHODS: fifty-two clinical trials were selected from 2,576 papers in databases for systematic review. It included the following methods: the fibrin glue, the sinusectomy, the video-assisted pilonidal sinus treatment, the laser coagulation and the chemical destruction using crystallized phenol or its solution. Regarding the last two methods, a meta-analysis was carried out.RESULTS: the meta-analysis demonstrated the high effectiveness of phenol and laser coagulation for pilonidal sinus disease. When comparing the results of phenol use and excisional techniques, there was a significant difference in higher frequency complications rate after excisional techniques (HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.05–3.71), while the recurrence rate was the same (HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.45–2.16). The probability of recurrence was significantly higher than after excision techniques in compare with SiLaC (HR 4.02; 95% CI: 1.13 14.3, p = 0.03). However, there was no significant differences in complication rate after SiLaC and excisional techniques (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.29–1.34).CONCLUSION: the chemical destruction and laser coagulation are the most effective methods for pilonidal sinus treatment.","PeriodicalId":17840,"journal":{"name":"Koloproktologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koloproktologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-149-159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM: to estimate the effectiveness of minimally invasive methods for treatment of chronic inflammation in pilonidal sinus disease by systematic review.PATIENTS AND METHODS: fifty-two clinical trials were selected from 2,576 papers in databases for systematic review. It included the following methods: the fibrin glue, the sinusectomy, the video-assisted pilonidal sinus treatment, the laser coagulation and the chemical destruction using crystallized phenol or its solution. Regarding the last two methods, a meta-analysis was carried out.RESULTS: the meta-analysis demonstrated the high effectiveness of phenol and laser coagulation for pilonidal sinus disease. When comparing the results of phenol use and excisional techniques, there was a significant difference in higher frequency complications rate after excisional techniques (HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.05–3.71), while the recurrence rate was the same (HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.45–2.16). The probability of recurrence was significantly higher than after excision techniques in compare with SiLaC (HR 4.02; 95% CI: 1.13 14.3, p = 0.03). However, there was no significant differences in complication rate after SiLaC and excisional techniques (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.29–1.34).CONCLUSION: the chemical destruction and laser coagulation are the most effective methods for pilonidal sinus treatment.
微创治疗毛毛窦疾病(一项系统回顾和荟萃分析)
目的:通过系统回顾评价微创方法治疗毛窦慢性炎症的有效性。患者和方法:从数据库中2576篇论文中选择52项临床试验进行系统评价。包括纤维蛋白胶、鼻窦切除术、电视辅助治疗毛毛窦、激光凝固和结晶苯酚或其溶液化学破坏。对后两种方法进行meta分析。结果:荟萃分析显示苯酚和激光凝固治疗毛毛窦疾病的有效性。当比较使用苯酚和切除技术的结果时,切除技术后的高频并发症发生率有显著差异(HR 0.42;95% CI: 0.05 ~ 3.71),复发率相同(HR 0.98;95% ci: 0.45-2.16)。与SiLaC相比,手术后复发的概率明显高于手术后(HR 4.02;95% CI: 1.13 14.3, p = 0.03)。然而,SiLaC和切除技术的并发症发生率无显著差异(HR 0.63;95% ci: 0.29-1.34)。结论:化学破坏和激光凝固是治疗毛窦最有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信