Unattended Mental Health Needs in Primary Care: Lebanon’s Shatila Palestinian Refugee Camp

S. Segal, V. Khoury, Ramy Salah, Jess Ghannam
{"title":"Unattended Mental Health Needs in Primary Care: Lebanon’s Shatila Palestinian Refugee Camp","authors":"S. Segal, V. Khoury, Ramy Salah, Jess Ghannam","doi":"10.1177/1179557320962523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study examines factors potentially contributing to unattended mental health needs among primary care patients in Lebanon’s Shatila Palestinian Refugee Camp in order to understand the prevalence of such needs and improve clinical practice with refugees and other vulnerable groups. Methods: Data collection (2012-13) involved researcher administered structured surveys of primary healthcare-clinic patients (n = 254) using the K6, the PC-PTSD, and the Modified-MINI mental illness screens. Chi. Sq., ANOVA and Principal Component analysis evaluate associations and differences in sample characteristics; Logistic regression evaluates factors associated with unattended-positive-mental-health-screens. Results: The sample (n = 254) included 55% females and 45% males; aged 18 to 89, M = 40.4 (±13). About 51.6% (n = 132) screened positive for mental illness, for these individuals only 11.4% (15 of 132) spoke to their physician about mental illness or had an acknowledged record of psychological problems. Thus 88.6% (n = 117) of those who screened positive, had unattended positive-screens. Univariate tests indicated that patients with “negative-screens,” those with “attended positive-screens,” and those with “unattended positive-screens” differed in their social and psychological characteristics as well as their relationship with the primary care setting. Overall multivariable Logistic results indicated that patients with unattended positive-screens were 34% less likely to have higher SES scores for each step up in status [OR = 0.66; CI: 0.48-0.89] and 58% less likely to have access to a provider for advice or assistance [OR = 0.42; CI: 0.20-0.88]. They were 2.2 times more likely to be females [OR = 2.20; CI: 1.22-3.95], and 5.26 times more likely to attribute their mental illness to a physical illness [OR = 5.26; CI: 2.36-11.74]. Conclusion: Large numbers of patients screen positive for mental illness who do not have their mental health need addressed during their primary care visit. This seems an issue rooted in a lack of psychoeducation about what is mental versus physical illness, female specific access to care, stigma toward mental illness, and cross-SES-communication. Improved communication in primary care, especially as it serves vulnerable refugee populations might significantly reduce the prevalence of untreated mental illness.","PeriodicalId":10437,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights: Psychiatry","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights: Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179557320962523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims: This study examines factors potentially contributing to unattended mental health needs among primary care patients in Lebanon’s Shatila Palestinian Refugee Camp in order to understand the prevalence of such needs and improve clinical practice with refugees and other vulnerable groups. Methods: Data collection (2012-13) involved researcher administered structured surveys of primary healthcare-clinic patients (n = 254) using the K6, the PC-PTSD, and the Modified-MINI mental illness screens. Chi. Sq., ANOVA and Principal Component analysis evaluate associations and differences in sample characteristics; Logistic regression evaluates factors associated with unattended-positive-mental-health-screens. Results: The sample (n = 254) included 55% females and 45% males; aged 18 to 89, M = 40.4 (±13). About 51.6% (n = 132) screened positive for mental illness, for these individuals only 11.4% (15 of 132) spoke to their physician about mental illness or had an acknowledged record of psychological problems. Thus 88.6% (n = 117) of those who screened positive, had unattended positive-screens. Univariate tests indicated that patients with “negative-screens,” those with “attended positive-screens,” and those with “unattended positive-screens” differed in their social and psychological characteristics as well as their relationship with the primary care setting. Overall multivariable Logistic results indicated that patients with unattended positive-screens were 34% less likely to have higher SES scores for each step up in status [OR = 0.66; CI: 0.48-0.89] and 58% less likely to have access to a provider for advice or assistance [OR = 0.42; CI: 0.20-0.88]. They were 2.2 times more likely to be females [OR = 2.20; CI: 1.22-3.95], and 5.26 times more likely to attribute their mental illness to a physical illness [OR = 5.26; CI: 2.36-11.74]. Conclusion: Large numbers of patients screen positive for mental illness who do not have their mental health need addressed during their primary care visit. This seems an issue rooted in a lack of psychoeducation about what is mental versus physical illness, female specific access to care, stigma toward mental illness, and cross-SES-communication. Improved communication in primary care, especially as it serves vulnerable refugee populations might significantly reduce the prevalence of untreated mental illness.
初级保健中无人照料的心理健康需求:黎巴嫩的沙提拉巴勒斯坦难民营
目的:本研究探讨了可能导致黎巴嫩Shatila巴勒斯坦难民营初级保健患者中无人照料的心理健康需求的因素,以了解这种需求的普遍性,并改善对难民和其他弱势群体的临床实践。方法:数据收集(2012- 2013)涉及研究者使用K6、PC-PTSD和改良的mini精神疾病筛查对初级卫生保健诊所患者(n = 254)进行结构化调查。太极拳。平方。,方差分析和主成分分析评估样本特征的关联和差异;逻辑回归评估与无人值守的积极心理健康筛查相关的因素。结果:254例患者中,女性占55%,男性占45%;18 ~ 89岁,M = 40.4(±13)。大约51.6% (n = 132)的人对精神疾病的筛查呈阳性,对于这些人来说,只有11.4%(132人中有15人)向医生谈论过精神疾病或有公认的心理问题记录。因此,88.6% (n = 117)的筛查呈阳性的患者进行了无人值守的阳性筛查。单变量测试表明,“阴性筛查”患者、“参加阳性筛查”患者和“未参加阳性筛查”患者在社会和心理特征以及与初级保健环境的关系方面存在差异。总体多变量Logistic分析结果显示,无人值守的阳性筛查患者的社会地位每提高一级,其SES得分提高的可能性降低34% [OR = 0.66;CI: 0.48-0.89], 58%的人不太可能获得提供者的建议或帮助[or = 0.42;置信区间:0.20—-0.88)。其中女性的可能性是男性的2.2倍[OR = 2.20;CI: 1.22-3.95],将精神疾病归因于身体疾病的可能性高出5.26倍[OR = 5.26;置信区间:2.36—-11.74)。结论:大量精神疾病筛查呈阳性的患者在初级保健就诊时没有解决他们的精神健康需求。这一问题的根源似乎是缺乏关于精神疾病和身体疾病的心理教育,女性获得护理的具体途径,对精神疾病的污名化,以及跨ses的沟通。改善初级保健方面的沟通,特别是在初级保健服务于弱势难民人口时,可能会大大减少未经治疗的精神疾病的流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信