Power of Forest Stakeholders in the Participatory Decision Making Process: A Case Study in Northern Italy

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
A. Paletto, J. Balest, I. Demeo, G. Giacovelli, G. Grilli
{"title":"Power of Forest Stakeholders in the Participatory Decision Making Process: A Case Study in Northern Italy","authors":"A. Paletto, J. Balest, I. Demeo, G. Giacovelli, G. Grilli","doi":"10.1515/aslh-2016-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In European countries, current forest use aims to enhance goods and services supplied by forest ecosystems, taking into account the multiple needs and interests of society through a participatory process. A successful participatory process requires a thorough analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions and preferences. The aim of this paper is to investigate the differences between stakeholders’ perceived influence and real power in forest management. A questionnaire survey was carried out among 51 forest stakeholders in a case study in the Italian Alps. Perceived influence was measured by asking stakeholders to rate on a 5-point scale the extent to which they can influence forest management issues. Real power was analyzed using social network analysis (SNA), investigating the relationships that stakeholders have with each other in the network. Real power was measured using a Freeman’s degree centrality measure, which focuses on the direct ties coming in and out for each stakeholder. The results show that public administration is the category of stakeholders with the most power in all forest management issues, while the actors of the tourism sector are in a marginal position. In addition, the results of the study suggest that in many cases stakeholders have a distorted perception of their own power.","PeriodicalId":53620,"journal":{"name":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/aslh-2016-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Abstract In European countries, current forest use aims to enhance goods and services supplied by forest ecosystems, taking into account the multiple needs and interests of society through a participatory process. A successful participatory process requires a thorough analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions and preferences. The aim of this paper is to investigate the differences between stakeholders’ perceived influence and real power in forest management. A questionnaire survey was carried out among 51 forest stakeholders in a case study in the Italian Alps. Perceived influence was measured by asking stakeholders to rate on a 5-point scale the extent to which they can influence forest management issues. Real power was analyzed using social network analysis (SNA), investigating the relationships that stakeholders have with each other in the network. Real power was measured using a Freeman’s degree centrality measure, which focuses on the direct ties coming in and out for each stakeholder. The results show that public administration is the category of stakeholders with the most power in all forest management issues, while the actors of the tourism sector are in a marginal position. In addition, the results of the study suggest that in many cases stakeholders have a distorted perception of their own power.
参与式决策过程中森林利益相关者的权力:意大利北部的案例研究
在欧洲国家,目前的森林利用旨在通过参与性过程,考虑到社会的多种需求和利益,增加森林生态系统提供的商品和服务。一个成功的参与性进程需要对利益相关者的看法和偏好进行彻底的分析。本文的目的是调查利益相关者在森林经营中的感知影响力和实际权力之间的差异。在意大利阿尔卑斯山的一个案例研究中,对51个森林利益相关者进行了问卷调查。感知的影响力是通过要求利益相关者以5分制对他们能够影响森林管理问题的程度进行评价来衡量的。使用社会网络分析(SNA)分析实权,调查利益相关者在网络中彼此之间的关系。实际权力是用弗里曼度中心性度量来衡量的,该度量侧重于每个利益相关者进出的直接联系。结果表明,公共行政是所有森林管理问题中最具权力的利益相关者类别,而旅游部门的行动者处于边缘地位。此外,研究结果表明,在许多情况下,利益相关者对自己的权力有一种扭曲的认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica
Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信