Compared the effect of indirect ELISA and serum plate agglutination (SPA) test for the detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chicken

Md. Zulfekar Ali, S. Sultana, Md. Rezaul Karim, Md. Zakir Hassan, Md. Abu Yousuf, A. Hossen, M. A. Samad, M. Giasuddin, Md Mostafizer Rahman
{"title":"Compared the effect of indirect ELISA and serum plate agglutination (SPA) test for the detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chicken","authors":"Md. Zulfekar Ali, S. Sultana, Md. Rezaul Karim, Md. Zakir Hassan, Md. Abu Yousuf, A. Hossen, M. A. Samad, M. Giasuddin, Md Mostafizer Rahman","doi":"10.13130/2283-3927/8975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) is a highly economical and persistent threat of poultry industry in Bangladesh. Indirect ELISA (iELISA) and Serum plate agglutination test (SPA) is available serological test for diagnosis of MG antibodies. The aim of this research was conducted on the basis of comparison on diagnosis results between iELISA and SPA test for MG antibody in same sample in layer chicken. Total 563 serum samples were collected and tested for MG antibody by both iELISA and SPA test. Out of 563 samples 363 (64.48%) samples were positive by iELISA and 316 (56.13%) samples were positive in SPA test. The higher incidence of MG antibody was found in chicken at 50-56 weeks and flock size was 3000-4200 as 69.63% by iELISA and 61.21% by SPA and in Sonali breeds 69.08% by iELISA and 60.64% by SPA. The results showed the comparatively higher number of positive results in iELISA test than SPA test. So the findings of the study demonstrated that a significant (p<0.05) difference between iELISA and SPA test present. The study may helpful for screening the flock for MG and small-holding farmers may use SPA test rather than iELISA test due to rapid, easy and cost effective.","PeriodicalId":14105,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health, Animal science and Food safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health, Animal science and Food safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/2283-3927/8975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) is a highly economical and persistent threat of poultry industry in Bangladesh. Indirect ELISA (iELISA) and Serum plate agglutination test (SPA) is available serological test for diagnosis of MG antibodies. The aim of this research was conducted on the basis of comparison on diagnosis results between iELISA and SPA test for MG antibody in same sample in layer chicken. Total 563 serum samples were collected and tested for MG antibody by both iELISA and SPA test. Out of 563 samples 363 (64.48%) samples were positive by iELISA and 316 (56.13%) samples were positive in SPA test. The higher incidence of MG antibody was found in chicken at 50-56 weeks and flock size was 3000-4200 as 69.63% by iELISA and 61.21% by SPA and in Sonali breeds 69.08% by iELISA and 60.64% by SPA. The results showed the comparatively higher number of positive results in iELISA test than SPA test. So the findings of the study demonstrated that a significant (p<0.05) difference between iELISA and SPA test present. The study may helpful for screening the flock for MG and small-holding farmers may use SPA test rather than iELISA test due to rapid, easy and cost effective.
比较间接ELISA法和血清平板凝集(SPA)法检测鸡鸡败菌支原体的效果
鸡败支原体(MG)是孟加拉国家禽业的一个高度经济和持久的威胁。间接ELISA (iELISA)和血清平板凝集试验(SPA)是诊断MG抗体的血清学检测方法。本研究的目的是在比较同一样品蛋鸡MG抗体的iELISA和SPA检测诊断结果的基础上进行的。共采集血清563份,采用elisa和SPA法检测MG抗体。563份样本中,iELISA阳性363份(64.48%),SPA阳性316份(56.13%)。50 ~ 56周龄、鸡群规模在3000 ~ 4200只的鸡中MG抗体的发生率较高,分别为iELISA法和SPA法的69.63%和61.21%,而索纳利鸡中iELISA法和SPA法分别为69.08%和60.64%。结果表明,iELISA测试的阳性结果比SPA测试的阳性结果要多。因此,本研究结果表明,iELISA与SPA测试之间存在显著(p<0.05)差异。本研究可为MG鸡群的筛选提供参考,小农可采用SPA法而非iELISA法,该法快速、简便、经济有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信