Gender Differences in Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms After a Disaster: A Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Jennifer M. First, Wes Bonifay, J. Houston
{"title":"Gender Differences in Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms After a Disaster: A Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised","authors":"Jennifer M. First, Wes Bonifay, J. Houston","doi":"10.1086/717263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Although research indicates that women are more likely than men to report posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following exposure to a disaster event, few studies have assessed whether these gender differences are due to bias in PTSD measures. Using item response theory, we conducted a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the widely used Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) to evaluate whether the instrument demonstrates equivalence when assessing PTSD symptoms among men and women after a major disaster (N=410). Method: We used ordinal logistic regression and item response theory modeling to investigate the presence and impact of DIF across gender groups. Results: One item (“I had waves of strong feelings about the 2011 tornado”) exhibited DIF across the subgroups for men and women. However, the magnitude of the DIF was minimal and did not produce differential measurement error at the total IES-R scale score level. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence of measurement equivalence of the IES-R and confirms its usefulness in screening for PTSD across gender groups following a disaster event.","PeriodicalId":51692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"657 - 676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although research indicates that women are more likely than men to report posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following exposure to a disaster event, few studies have assessed whether these gender differences are due to bias in PTSD measures. Using item response theory, we conducted a differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the widely used Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) to evaluate whether the instrument demonstrates equivalence when assessing PTSD symptoms among men and women after a major disaster (N=410). Method: We used ordinal logistic regression and item response theory modeling to investigate the presence and impact of DIF across gender groups. Results: One item (“I had waves of strong feelings about the 2011 tornado”) exhibited DIF across the subgroups for men and women. However, the magnitude of the DIF was minimal and did not produce differential measurement error at the total IES-R scale score level. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence of measurement equivalence of the IES-R and confirms its usefulness in screening for PTSD across gender groups following a disaster event.
灾难后创伤后应激症状的性别差异:事件量表影响的差异项目功能分析-修订
目的:尽管研究表明,女性比男性更有可能在遭受灾难事件后报告创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状,但很少有研究评估这些性别差异是否由于PTSD测量的偏见。使用项目反应理论,我们对广泛使用的事件影响量表(IES-R)进行了差异项目功能(DIF)分析,以评估该工具在评估重大灾难后男性和女性PTSD症状时是否具有等效性(N=410)。方法:采用有序逻辑回归和项目反应理论模型,探讨不同性别群体中DIF的存在及其影响。结果:有一项(“我对2011年的龙卷风有一波波强烈的感觉”)在男性和女性的亚组中都表现出DIF。然而,DIF的幅度很小,在IES-R量表总分水平上没有产生差异测量误差。结论:这些发现为IES-R的测量等效性提供了证据,并证实了其在灾难事件后跨性别群体筛查PTSD的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to presenting innovative, rigorous original research on social problems, intervention programs, and policies. By creating a venue for the timely dissemination of empirical findings and advances in research methods, JSSWR seeks to strengthen the rigor of social work research and advance the knowledge in social work and allied professions and disciplines. Special emphasis is placed on publishing findings on the effectiveness of social and health services, including public policies and practices. JSSWR publishes an array of perspectives, research approaches, and types of analyses that advance knowledge useful for designing social programs, developing innovative public policies, and improving social work practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信