Casing Failure Data Analytics: A Novel Data Mining Approach in Predicting Casing Failures for Improved Drilling Performance and Production Optimization

C. Noshi, S. Noynaert, J. Schubert
{"title":"Casing Failure Data Analytics: A Novel Data Mining Approach in Predicting Casing Failures for Improved Drilling Performance and Production Optimization","authors":"C. Noshi, S. Noynaert, J. Schubert","doi":"10.2118/191570-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The last decade has spotted a tremendous upsurge in casing failures. The aftermaths of casing failure can include the possibility of blowouts, environmental pollution, injuries/fatalities, and loss of the entire well to name a few. The motivation behind this work is to present findings from a predictive analytics investigation of casing failure data using supervised and unsupervised data mining algorithms. Scientists and researchers have speculated the potential underlying causes of failure but to date this type of work remains unpublished and unavailable in the public domain literature.\n The study assembled comprehensive data from eighty land-based wells during drilling, fracturing, workover, and production operations. Twenty wells suffered from casing failure while the remaining sixty offset wells were compiled from well reports, fracturing treatment data, drilling records, and recovered casing data. The failures were unsystemic but included fatigue failure, bending stresses from excessive dogleg, buckling, high hoop stress on connections, and split coupling. The failures were detected at various depths, both in cemented and uncemented hole sections. Failures were spotted at the upper and lower production casing. Using a predictive analytics software from SAS, twenty-six variables were evaluated through the application of various data mining techniques on the failed casing data points. The missing data was accounted for using multivariate normal imputation. The study outcome addressed common casing sizes and couplings involved with each failure, failure location, hydraulic fracturing stages, cement impairment, dogleg severity, thermal and tensile loads, production-induced shearing, and DLS. The predictive algorithms used in this study included Logistic Regression, supervised Hierarchal Clustering, and Decision Trees. While the descriptive analytics manifested in visual representations included Scatterplot Matrices and PivotTables. A combination of the causes of failure were identified. A total of five statistical techniques using the aforementioned algorithms were developed to evaluate the concurrent effect of the interplay of these variables. Nineteen variables were believed to possess a high contribution to failure. Scatterplot matrix suggested a complex correlation between the total base water used in fracturing simulation and casing thickness. Logistic Regression suggested nine variables were significant including: TVD, operator, frac start month, MD of most severe DL, heel TVD, hole size, BHT, total proppant mass, cumulative DLS in lateral and build sections variables as significant failure contributors. PivotTables showed that the rate of casing failure was highest during the winter season.\n This investigation is aimed to develop a thorough understanding of casing failures and the myriad of contributing factors to develop comprehensive predictive models for future failure prediction via the application of data mining algorithms. These models intend to provide a theoretical and statistical basis for cost-effective, safe, and better drilling practices.","PeriodicalId":11015,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 24, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191570-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The last decade has spotted a tremendous upsurge in casing failures. The aftermaths of casing failure can include the possibility of blowouts, environmental pollution, injuries/fatalities, and loss of the entire well to name a few. The motivation behind this work is to present findings from a predictive analytics investigation of casing failure data using supervised and unsupervised data mining algorithms. Scientists and researchers have speculated the potential underlying causes of failure but to date this type of work remains unpublished and unavailable in the public domain literature. The study assembled comprehensive data from eighty land-based wells during drilling, fracturing, workover, and production operations. Twenty wells suffered from casing failure while the remaining sixty offset wells were compiled from well reports, fracturing treatment data, drilling records, and recovered casing data. The failures were unsystemic but included fatigue failure, bending stresses from excessive dogleg, buckling, high hoop stress on connections, and split coupling. The failures were detected at various depths, both in cemented and uncemented hole sections. Failures were spotted at the upper and lower production casing. Using a predictive analytics software from SAS, twenty-six variables were evaluated through the application of various data mining techniques on the failed casing data points. The missing data was accounted for using multivariate normal imputation. The study outcome addressed common casing sizes and couplings involved with each failure, failure location, hydraulic fracturing stages, cement impairment, dogleg severity, thermal and tensile loads, production-induced shearing, and DLS. The predictive algorithms used in this study included Logistic Regression, supervised Hierarchal Clustering, and Decision Trees. While the descriptive analytics manifested in visual representations included Scatterplot Matrices and PivotTables. A combination of the causes of failure were identified. A total of five statistical techniques using the aforementioned algorithms were developed to evaluate the concurrent effect of the interplay of these variables. Nineteen variables were believed to possess a high contribution to failure. Scatterplot matrix suggested a complex correlation between the total base water used in fracturing simulation and casing thickness. Logistic Regression suggested nine variables were significant including: TVD, operator, frac start month, MD of most severe DL, heel TVD, hole size, BHT, total proppant mass, cumulative DLS in lateral and build sections variables as significant failure contributors. PivotTables showed that the rate of casing failure was highest during the winter season. This investigation is aimed to develop a thorough understanding of casing failures and the myriad of contributing factors to develop comprehensive predictive models for future failure prediction via the application of data mining algorithms. These models intend to provide a theoretical and statistical basis for cost-effective, safe, and better drilling practices.
套管失效数据分析:一种新的数据挖掘方法,用于预测套管失效,以提高钻井性能和优化生产
在过去的十年中,套管失效的数量急剧上升。套管失效的后果可能包括井喷、环境污染、伤亡和整口井的损失等。这项工作背后的动机是利用有监督和无监督数据挖掘算法对套管失效数据进行预测分析研究。科学家和研究人员推测了失败的潜在原因,但到目前为止,这类工作仍未发表,也无法在公共领域文献中找到。该研究收集了80口陆基井在钻井、压裂、修井和生产过程中的综合数据。20口井出现套管损坏,其余60口井根据井报告、压裂处理数据、钻井记录和回收的套管数据进行了整理。失效不是系统性的,但包括疲劳失效、过度狗腿造成的弯曲应力、屈曲、连接件上的高环向应力和联轴器断裂。在不同深度(包括胶结井段和未胶结井段)均检测到失效。在上部和下部生产套管都发现了故障。使用SAS的预测分析软件,通过对失效套管数据点应用各种数据挖掘技术,对26个变量进行了评估。缺失的数据使用多元正态插值进行解释。研究结果涵盖了常见的套管尺寸和套管接头,包括每次失效、失效位置、水力压裂阶段、水泥损伤、狗腿严重程度、热载荷和拉伸载荷、生产诱导剪切和DLS。本研究中使用的预测算法包括逻辑回归、监督层次聚类和决策树。而描述性分析则体现在视觉表示中,包括散点图矩阵和数据透视表。确定了故障原因的组合。使用上述算法共开发了五种统计技术来评估这些变量相互作用的并发效应。19个变量被认为对失败有很大的贡献。散点图矩阵表明,压裂模拟中使用的总基水与套管厚度之间存在复杂的相关性。Logistic回归分析表明,9个变量具有显著性,包括TVD、作业者、压裂开始月份、最严重深度下降的MD、跟部TVD、井眼尺寸、BHT、总支撑剂质量、横向累积DLS和建井段变量。数据透视表显示,套管失败率在冬季最高。该研究旨在通过数据挖掘算法的应用,全面了解套管失效及其影响因素,为未来的失效预测建立全面的预测模型。这些模型旨在为具有成本效益、安全性和更好的钻井实践提供理论和统计基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信