Impact of crown-to-implant ratio of marginal bone loss around implant-supported single crowns. A 5 years retrospective study

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Biser Stoichkov, D. Kirov
{"title":"Impact of crown-to-implant ratio of marginal bone loss around implant-supported single crowns. A 5 years retrospective study","authors":"Biser Stoichkov, D. Kirov","doi":"10.23805/JO.2020.12.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim The success of implant-supported restorations depends on the stability of osseointegration and the amount of bone-to-implant contact. The aim of the present study is to assess the influence of the crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss in prosthetic restorations with single implant-supported crowns. \nMaterials and methods Retrospectively, 65 patients with one missing tooth in the mandibular molar area were collected. All prosthetic restorations were made with single crowns, and all implants used were “bone level” type having a diameter in the range of 3.9 to 4.0 mm and a length of 10.0 to 13.0 mm. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were performed in central occlusion. The height of restorative space was measured over the cross-sections from the level of the alveolar ridge to the corresponding antagonist crowns. Available bone height, width and length were also evaluated prior to implantation. Marginal bone loss was measured on pre-calibrated periapical radiographs, using ImageJ 1.52 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), in third and fifth year after the functional load. \nResults Positive linear correlation, statistically significant, has been determined between the crown-to-implant ratio and the amount of crestal resorption. The highest peri-implant bone loss was  recorded in cases with crown-to-implant ratio of 1.5/1 and higher. \nConclusion The results of this study indicate that prosthetic restorations with higher crown-to-implant ratio tend to cause higher marginal bone loss than those with lower one, in the mandibular molar area.","PeriodicalId":42724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osseointegration","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osseointegration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2020.12.01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim The success of implant-supported restorations depends on the stability of osseointegration and the amount of bone-to-implant contact. The aim of the present study is to assess the influence of the crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss in prosthetic restorations with single implant-supported crowns. Materials and methods Retrospectively, 65 patients with one missing tooth in the mandibular molar area were collected. All prosthetic restorations were made with single crowns, and all implants used were “bone level” type having a diameter in the range of 3.9 to 4.0 mm and a length of 10.0 to 13.0 mm. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were performed in central occlusion. The height of restorative space was measured over the cross-sections from the level of the alveolar ridge to the corresponding antagonist crowns. Available bone height, width and length were also evaluated prior to implantation. Marginal bone loss was measured on pre-calibrated periapical radiographs, using ImageJ 1.52 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), in third and fifth year after the functional load. Results Positive linear correlation, statistically significant, has been determined between the crown-to-implant ratio and the amount of crestal resorption. The highest peri-implant bone loss was  recorded in cases with crown-to-implant ratio of 1.5/1 and higher. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that prosthetic restorations with higher crown-to-implant ratio tend to cause higher marginal bone loss than those with lower one, in the mandibular molar area.
种植体支持的单冠周边边缘骨流失对冠与种植体比例的影响。一项5年回顾性研究
目的种植体支撑修复体的成功与否取决于骨结合的稳定性和骨与种植体的接触量。本研究的目的是评估冠与种植体比例对单种植体支撑冠修复体边缘骨丢失的影响。材料与方法回顾性收集下颌磨牙区1颗缺牙患者65例。所有修复体均采用单冠,种植体均为“骨水平”型,种植体直径为3.9 ~ 4.0 mm,长度为10.0 ~ 13.0 mm。中央闭塞行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)。从牙槽嵴水平到相应拮抗剂冠的横截面上测量修复空间的高度。植入前评估可用骨高度、宽度和长度。在功能负荷后的第3年和第5年,使用ImageJ 1.52 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA)在预先校准的根尖周围x线片上测量边缘骨质流失。结果牙冠与种植体的比例与牙冠吸收量呈显著的线性正相关。当冠与种植体之比大于1.5/1时,种植体周围骨丢失最高。结论下颌磨牙区牙冠与种植体之比越高,牙冠与种植体之比越低,牙冠与种植体之比越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Osseointegration
Journal of Osseointegration DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信