Tourism De-Metropolisation but Not De-Concentration: COVID-19 and World Destinations

C. Adamiak
{"title":"Tourism De-Metropolisation but Not De-Concentration: COVID-19 and World Destinations","authors":"C. Adamiak","doi":"10.3390/ijgi12040139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current COVID-19 pandemic has caused a significant decline in human mobility during the past three years. This may lead to reconfiguring future tourism flows and resulting transformations in the geographic patterns of economic activities and transportation needs. This study empirically addresses the changes in tourism mobility caused by the pandemic. It focuses on the yet unexplored effects of the destination type on tourism volume change. To investigate this, 1426 metropolitan, urban/resort and dispersed destinations were delimited based on Airbnb offers. Airbnb reviews were used as the proxy for the changes in tourist visits in 2019–2022. Linear mixed-effects models were employed to verify two hypotheses on the differences between the effects of the pandemic on three kinds of tourism destinations. The results confirm the tourism de-metropolisation hypothesis: metropolitan destinations have experienced between −12.4% and −7.5% additional decreases in tourism visits compared to secondary cities and resorts. The second de-concentration hypothesis that urban/resort destinations are more affected than dispersed tourism destinations is not supported. The results also confirm that stricter restrictions and destination dependence on international tourism have negatively affected their visitation. The study sheds light on post-pandemic scenarios on tourism mobility transformations in various geographic locations.","PeriodicalId":14614,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf.","volume":"41 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12040139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic has caused a significant decline in human mobility during the past three years. This may lead to reconfiguring future tourism flows and resulting transformations in the geographic patterns of economic activities and transportation needs. This study empirically addresses the changes in tourism mobility caused by the pandemic. It focuses on the yet unexplored effects of the destination type on tourism volume change. To investigate this, 1426 metropolitan, urban/resort and dispersed destinations were delimited based on Airbnb offers. Airbnb reviews were used as the proxy for the changes in tourist visits in 2019–2022. Linear mixed-effects models were employed to verify two hypotheses on the differences between the effects of the pandemic on three kinds of tourism destinations. The results confirm the tourism de-metropolisation hypothesis: metropolitan destinations have experienced between −12.4% and −7.5% additional decreases in tourism visits compared to secondary cities and resorts. The second de-concentration hypothesis that urban/resort destinations are more affected than dispersed tourism destinations is not supported. The results also confirm that stricter restrictions and destination dependence on international tourism have negatively affected their visitation. The study sheds light on post-pandemic scenarios on tourism mobility transformations in various geographic locations.
非大都市化而非集中化:COVID-19与世界旅游目的地
当前的COVID-19大流行在过去三年中导致人员流动性大幅下降。这可能导致重新配置未来的旅游流量,并导致经济活动和运输需求的地理格局发生变化。本研究从实证角度探讨了疫情对旅游流动性的影响。它侧重于尚未探索的目的地类型对旅游量变化的影响。为了调查这一点,1426个大都市、城市/度假胜地和分散的目的地根据Airbnb的报价进行了划分。Airbnb的评论被用作2019-2022年游客访问量变化的代表。采用线性混合效应模型验证了关于大流行对三种旅游目的地影响差异的两个假设。结果证实了旅游去大都市化的假设:与二线城市和度假胜地相比,大都市目的地的旅游访问量额外减少了12.4%至7.5%。第二个去集中化假设,即城市/度假目的地比分散的旅游目的地受影响更大,不被支持。结果还证实,更严格的限制和目的地对国际旅游的依赖对他们的访问产生了负面影响。该研究揭示了大流行后不同地理位置旅游流动性转变的情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信