Examining dynamic risk and strength profiles for Indigenous and non-Indigenous young adults

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Danielle J. Rieger, Dara C Drawbridge, D. Robinson
{"title":"Examining dynamic risk and strength profiles for Indigenous and non-Indigenous young adults","authors":"Danielle J. Rieger, Dara C Drawbridge, D. Robinson","doi":"10.1080/1068316X.2021.2018439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Young adults are particularly at risk for involvement in the justice system relative to older adults. Little research specifically examines age-related differences in salience of dynamic risk and strength factor scores on recidivism (e.g. Spruit, A., van der Put, C., Gubbels, J., & Bindels, A. (2017). Age differences in the severity, impact and relative importance of dynamic risk factors for recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 50, 69–77) and no research specifically examines this question in Indigenous Canadian adults. To address this gap, the current study examines the predictive accuracy and calibration of a risk-needs assessment tool, the Service Planning Instrument (SPIn), by age group and examines age-related differences in prevalence and salience of dynamic risk and strength scores on recidivism for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous male adults. The authors obtained SPIn assessment data completed over a 6-year period and recidivism data with a fixed 3-year follow-up for justice-involved male adults on community supervision in a single province in Canada (N = 16,596). Risk and strength profiles for Indigenous and non-Indigenous young adults were relatively similar. Age moderated the relationship between several dynamic risk and strength factor scores and recidivism for non-Indigenous individuals; no factors were moderated by age for Indigenous individuals.","PeriodicalId":47845,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Crime & Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"222 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Crime & Law","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.2018439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Young adults are particularly at risk for involvement in the justice system relative to older adults. Little research specifically examines age-related differences in salience of dynamic risk and strength factor scores on recidivism (e.g. Spruit, A., van der Put, C., Gubbels, J., & Bindels, A. (2017). Age differences in the severity, impact and relative importance of dynamic risk factors for recidivism. Journal of Criminal Justice, 50, 69–77) and no research specifically examines this question in Indigenous Canadian adults. To address this gap, the current study examines the predictive accuracy and calibration of a risk-needs assessment tool, the Service Planning Instrument (SPIn), by age group and examines age-related differences in prevalence and salience of dynamic risk and strength scores on recidivism for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous male adults. The authors obtained SPIn assessment data completed over a 6-year period and recidivism data with a fixed 3-year follow-up for justice-involved male adults on community supervision in a single province in Canada (N = 16,596). Risk and strength profiles for Indigenous and non-Indigenous young adults were relatively similar. Age moderated the relationship between several dynamic risk and strength factor scores and recidivism for non-Indigenous individuals; no factors were moderated by age for Indigenous individuals.
检查土著和非土著青年成人的动态风险和力量概况
与老年人相比,年轻人尤其容易卷入司法系统。很少有研究专门研究累犯的动态风险和强度因子得分的显著性与年龄相关的差异(例如Spruit, A., van der Put, C., Gubbels, J., & Bindels, A.(2017)。累犯动态危险因素的严重程度、影响和相对重要性的年龄差异。刑事司法杂志,50,69-77),没有研究专门调查这个问题的土著加拿大成年人。为了解决这一差距,本研究按年龄组检查了风险需求评估工具服务规划工具(SPIn)的预测准确性和校准,并检查了土著和非土著成年男性累犯动态风险和力量评分的流行率和显著性的年龄相关差异。作者获得了加拿大一个省(N = 16,596)参与司法的成年男性在社区监督中完成的为期6年的SPIn评估数据和固定3年随访的累犯数据。土著和非土著年轻人的风险和力量概况相对相似。年龄调节了几个动态风险和力量因素得分与非土著个体再犯的关系;对于土著个体,没有因素受年龄的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: This journal promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to crime, criminal and civil law, and the influence of law on behavior. The content includes the aetiology of criminal behavior and studies of different offender groups; crime detection, for example, interrogation and witness testimony; courtroom studies in areas such as jury behavior, decision making, divorce and custody, and expert testimony; behavior of litigants, lawyers, judges, and court officers, both in and outside the courtroom; issues of offender management including prisons, probation, and rehabilitation initiatives; and studies of public, including the victim, reactions to crime and the legal process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信