It's a Small World after All: Using Social Network Analysis to Investigate Systemic Risk in the Australian Superannuation Sector

Rob Nicholls, M. Donald, K. Liu
{"title":"It's a Small World after All: Using Social Network Analysis to Investigate Systemic Risk in the Australian Superannuation Sector","authors":"Rob Nicholls, M. Donald, K. Liu","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2622304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australia’s superannuation (pension) sector is extraordinarily large by almost any measure. The system is the fourth largest in the world with assets under management exceeding $A2 trillion (€1.3 trillion). Approximately two thirds of the system ($A1.2 trillion) is managed in the large-scale intermediated superannuation funds that are the subject of this study. At one level, these funds appear to be functionally and financially independent of each other. However, they are linked by the common use of service providers. Indeed, the regulatory approach, for those entities that are actually regulated is to treat each of the service providers in separate silos.This paper examines the effects of the service provider linkages using a network science approach. It demonstrates that social network analysis and network science theory can be used to describe the level of interconnectedness within the Australian superannuation sector. It shows that the system has some ‘small world’ characteristics and analyses the consequences of these characteristics. In particular, it concludes that a more holistic regulatory approach is required in order to be able to identify systemic risk, which is not apparent from the current silo-based analysis.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee benefits journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2622304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Australia’s superannuation (pension) sector is extraordinarily large by almost any measure. The system is the fourth largest in the world with assets under management exceeding $A2 trillion (€1.3 trillion). Approximately two thirds of the system ($A1.2 trillion) is managed in the large-scale intermediated superannuation funds that are the subject of this study. At one level, these funds appear to be functionally and financially independent of each other. However, they are linked by the common use of service providers. Indeed, the regulatory approach, for those entities that are actually regulated is to treat each of the service providers in separate silos.This paper examines the effects of the service provider linkages using a network science approach. It demonstrates that social network analysis and network science theory can be used to describe the level of interconnectedness within the Australian superannuation sector. It shows that the system has some ‘small world’ characteristics and analyses the consequences of these characteristics. In particular, it concludes that a more holistic regulatory approach is required in order to be able to identify systemic risk, which is not apparent from the current silo-based analysis.
毕竟这是一个小世界:使用社会网络分析来调查澳大利亚养老金部门的系统性风险
无论以何种标准衡量,澳大利亚的退休金部门都异常庞大。该系统是世界第四大系统,管理的资产超过A2万亿美元(1.3万亿欧元)。该系统的大约三分之二(1.2万亿美元)由大型中介退休基金管理,这是本研究的主题。在某种程度上,这些基金似乎在职能上和财政上彼此独立。然而,它们被共同使用的服务提供者联系在一起。事实上,对于那些实际受到监管的实体来说,监管方法是将每个服务提供商置于单独的孤岛中。本文采用网络科学的方法考察了服务提供商联系的影响。这表明社会网络分析和网络科学理论可以用来描述澳大利亚养老金部门内部的相互联系水平。说明了该系统具有一些“小世界”特征,并分析了这些特征的后果。特别是,它得出的结论是,为了能够识别系统风险,需要一种更全面的监管方法,这从目前基于竖井的分析中是不明显的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信