Ultrasound Guided Nerve Stimulation and Nerve Stimulation Alone for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block – A Randomized Comparative Study

M. Hassan, A. Akhtaruzzaman, A. F. Hoque, Rezwanur Rahman, S. Yeasmeen, D. Banik
{"title":"Ultrasound Guided Nerve Stimulation and Nerve Stimulation Alone for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block – A Randomized Comparative Study","authors":"M. Hassan, A. Akhtaruzzaman, A. F. Hoque, Rezwanur Rahman, S. Yeasmeen, D. Banik","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The safety of regional anaesthesia become more pronounced by the use of ultrasound andnerve stimulator. Supraclavicular nerve blocks known as ‘spinal of the arm’ are the most attractiveupper extremity blocks to perform in our practice. In this study less experienced hands try to found thebest approach for upper extremity block.\nObjective: To comparethe success rate when Ultrasound addedwith Peripheral nerve stimulator insupraclavicular brachial plexus block.\nMethods: After IRB approval and written consents from patients, total 66 patients divided into twogroups,Group USNS had supraclavicular block guided by both ultrasound and Nerve stimulator. Onthe other hand Group BNS had this block by only Nerve stimulator. All the equipments kept ready andmaintaining sterility a mixture of 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% plain Lignocaine were prepared. The amountinjected according to the body weight without crossing the toxic dose (2mg/Kg 0.5% Bupivacaine, 5mg/Kg 2% Lignocaine). Total volumes were 25-30ml for every patient.The sensory block was assessed byobservers who unaware of the technique for every 2 minutes till the onset of block and every 10 minutesthereafter for 30 minutes. Any failure in establishing the block was converted to GA. The sensorydermatomes were assessed by alcohol swab. The motor blocks were evaluated by the same observer ineach jointfor every 2 minutes till onset than 10, 20 & at the end of 30 minutes.Successful block wasconsidered if no supplementation or conversion to general anaesthesia required.\nResults: In all demographic variables and ASA Class, there was no differences in between the USNSgroup and BNS group.In group USNS block execution time was significantly higher(P<0.05). The timerequired for both sensory and motor block was statistically significantly less in Group USNS comparedto Group BNS (P value < 0.05). Regarding quality of motor block, at wrist joint statistical significancepresent between two groups ( p value < 0.05 ). The duration of analgesia is significantly lower in GroupBNS than Group USNS (P value is 0.012).In Group USNS, only one (3.03%) patient neededsupplementation. But in Group BNS 7 (21.21%) patients needed supplementation. According to thedefinition, these cases were regarded as failed case. The success rate is significantly higher in GroupUSNS (P value is 0.024).\nConclusion: Combined use of ultrasound and peripheral nerve stimulator increases success rate thanperipheral nerve stimulator alone in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. This combined method alsoreduces block execution time, early onset of both sensory and motor block, improve quality of sensory andmotor block and less incidence of complications.\nJBSA 2018; 31(2): 54-61\n ","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The safety of regional anaesthesia become more pronounced by the use of ultrasound andnerve stimulator. Supraclavicular nerve blocks known as ‘spinal of the arm’ are the most attractiveupper extremity blocks to perform in our practice. In this study less experienced hands try to found thebest approach for upper extremity block. Objective: To comparethe success rate when Ultrasound addedwith Peripheral nerve stimulator insupraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: After IRB approval and written consents from patients, total 66 patients divided into twogroups,Group USNS had supraclavicular block guided by both ultrasound and Nerve stimulator. Onthe other hand Group BNS had this block by only Nerve stimulator. All the equipments kept ready andmaintaining sterility a mixture of 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% plain Lignocaine were prepared. The amountinjected according to the body weight without crossing the toxic dose (2mg/Kg 0.5% Bupivacaine, 5mg/Kg 2% Lignocaine). Total volumes were 25-30ml for every patient.The sensory block was assessed byobservers who unaware of the technique for every 2 minutes till the onset of block and every 10 minutesthereafter for 30 minutes. Any failure in establishing the block was converted to GA. The sensorydermatomes were assessed by alcohol swab. The motor blocks were evaluated by the same observer ineach jointfor every 2 minutes till onset than 10, 20 & at the end of 30 minutes.Successful block wasconsidered if no supplementation or conversion to general anaesthesia required. Results: In all demographic variables and ASA Class, there was no differences in between the USNSgroup and BNS group.In group USNS block execution time was significantly higher(P<0.05). The timerequired for both sensory and motor block was statistically significantly less in Group USNS comparedto Group BNS (P value < 0.05). Regarding quality of motor block, at wrist joint statistical significancepresent between two groups ( p value < 0.05 ). The duration of analgesia is significantly lower in GroupBNS than Group USNS (P value is 0.012).In Group USNS, only one (3.03%) patient neededsupplementation. But in Group BNS 7 (21.21%) patients needed supplementation. According to thedefinition, these cases were regarded as failed case. The success rate is significantly higher in GroupUSNS (P value is 0.024). Conclusion: Combined use of ultrasound and peripheral nerve stimulator increases success rate thanperipheral nerve stimulator alone in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. This combined method alsoreduces block execution time, early onset of both sensory and motor block, improve quality of sensory andmotor block and less incidence of complications. JBSA 2018; 31(2): 54-61  
超声引导下神经刺激与单独神经刺激治疗锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的随机对照研究
背景:随着超声和神经刺激器的应用,区域麻醉的安全性越来越明显。锁骨上神经阻滞被称为“手臂脊柱”是上肢最有吸引力的阻滞在我们的实践中执行。在这项研究中,缺乏经验的手试图找到上肢阻滞的最佳方法。目的:比较超声加周围神经刺激器与锁骨上臂丛阻滞术的成功率。方法:经IRB批准并征得患者书面同意后,将66例患者分为两组,USNS组在超声和神经刺激器引导下行锁骨上阻滞。另一方面,BNS组仅用神经刺激剂阻滞。所有设备准备就绪并保持无菌,配制0.5%布比卡因和2%利多卡因的混合物。在不超过中毒剂量(0.5%布比卡因2mg/Kg, 2%利多卡因5mg/Kg)的情况下,按体重注射量。每例患者总容积25-30ml。感觉阻滞由不知情的观察者每2分钟评估一次,直到阻滞开始,之后每10分钟评估一次,持续30分钟。任何建立块的失败都被转换为GA。用酒精棉签法测定感觉皮节。运动阻滞由同一位观察者每2分钟对每个关节进行一次评估,直到开始、10分钟、20分钟和30分钟结束。如果不需要补充或转为全身麻醉,则认为阻滞成功。结果:在所有人口统计学变量和ASA分类中,usns组和BNS组之间没有差异。USNS组患者block执行时间显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。USNS组感觉阻滞和运动阻滞所需时间均少于BNS组(P值< 0.05)。在腕关节运动块质量方面,两组间差异有统计学意义(p值< 0.05)。bns组镇痛持续时间明显低于USNS组(P值为0.012)。在USNS组中,只有1例(3.03%)患者需要补充。但在BNS 7组(21.21%)患者需要补充。根据定义,这些案例被视为失败案例。GroupUSNS组的成功率显著高于对照组(P值为0.024)。结论:超声联合外周神经刺激器治疗锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的成功率高于单独外周神经刺激器。这种联合方法还减少了阻滞执行时间,早期出现感觉和运动阻滞,提高了感觉和运动阻滞的质量,减少了并发症的发生。JBSA 2018;31 (2): 54 - 61
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信