Der Begriff der Zurechnung in Immanuel Kants „Philosophia practica universalis“

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Martin Heuser
{"title":"Der Begriff der Zurechnung in Immanuel Kants „Philosophia practica universalis“","authors":"Martin Heuser","doi":"10.25162/arsp-2020-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of moral imputation has so far received little attention in the reception of the Kantian work. Owing to a traceable reduction in the literal meaning of the notion of deed (“factum”), a concept which is vital for the operation of imputation, resulting in the modern notion of fact (“facticity”), it was so far overseen, that the notion of freedom, which is already presupposed as determining factor in the Kantian notion of imputation, is itself based on a relation of imputation that goes by the name of the famous “factum of reason”. In the light of the above, this article examines the notion of imputation as it is established more closely in the introduction of the “Metaphysics of Morals” (1797) by Immanuel Kant.","PeriodicalId":41477,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2020-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion of moral imputation has so far received little attention in the reception of the Kantian work. Owing to a traceable reduction in the literal meaning of the notion of deed (“factum”), a concept which is vital for the operation of imputation, resulting in the modern notion of fact (“facticity”), it was so far overseen, that the notion of freedom, which is already presupposed as determining factor in the Kantian notion of imputation, is itself based on a relation of imputation that goes by the name of the famous “factum of reason”. In the light of the above, this article examines the notion of imputation as it is established more closely in the introduction of the “Metaphysics of Morals” (1797) by Immanuel Kant.
在“通用通用语”中找到的说法
道德归责的概念迄今为止在接受康德的著作时很少受到关注。由于行为概念(“事实”)的字面意义可追溯的减少,这一概念对归咎的操作至关重要,导致了现代事实概念(“事实性”),它迄今为止被忽视了,自由的概念,已经被预设为康德归咎概念的决定因素,它本身基于一个归咎关系,以著名的“理性的事实”的名字命名。鉴于以上所述,本文考察了在伊曼努尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)的《道德形而上学》(1797)的介绍中更紧密地建立起来的归责概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信