PG24 Evaluation of a co-produced simulation based perinatal mental health (PMH) programme

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
R. Kerslake, J. Cooke, Alexandra J. Joy, M. Harris
{"title":"PG24 Evaluation of a co-produced simulation based perinatal mental health (PMH) programme","authors":"R. Kerslake, J. Cooke, Alexandra J. Joy, M. Harris","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Core principles of the NHS England’s Long Term Plan for Mental Health include development of PMH services and co-production with people with lived experience of services. Women suffering with PMH disorders often present first to clinicians who are not specialists. Training the wider workforce in assessment and management of PMH disorders is a priority. A simulation-based training programme was co-produced with service users in all stage, including debriefing. Summary of Work Three Service User Consultants (SUCs) were employed as faculty members for the design of scenarios. The SUCs were also trained to facilitate the debriefing of scenarios, alongside a psychiatrist. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected on the simulation participants’ confidence and knowledge as a result of the training. 12 domains aligned with Health Education England’s (HEE) PMH competency framework were assessed, alongside the value of service user involvement. Data was collected before, immediately after and 2 months after the training. Summary of Results 103 participants completed the training over 10 dates. Comparing confidence before and after the training, scores improved by between 15–28% in all 12 domains. 94% of participants graded the contributions of SUCs as either useful or very useful. These effects were sustained 2 months after the training. These effects were reflected in the qualitative feedback from participants. Qualitative feedback from participants identified an improvement in their knowledge as a result of the training, however it was not possible to demonstrate this statistically. Discussion and Conclusions This co-produced simulation based PMH programme increases confidence, knowledge and understanding amongst non-specialist health professionals from across the PMH care pathway on a number of domains aligned with the HEE perinatal MH competency framework. Participants were overwhelming in support of SUC involvement in the debriefing and noted that scenarios highly resembled real-life clinical encounters as a result. Providing SUCs with robust training, supervision and psychological support throughout the design and debriefing process is essential to the effectiveness and sustainability of the programme.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Core principles of the NHS England’s Long Term Plan for Mental Health include development of PMH services and co-production with people with lived experience of services. Women suffering with PMH disorders often present first to clinicians who are not specialists. Training the wider workforce in assessment and management of PMH disorders is a priority. A simulation-based training programme was co-produced with service users in all stage, including debriefing. Summary of Work Three Service User Consultants (SUCs) were employed as faculty members for the design of scenarios. The SUCs were also trained to facilitate the debriefing of scenarios, alongside a psychiatrist. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected on the simulation participants’ confidence and knowledge as a result of the training. 12 domains aligned with Health Education England’s (HEE) PMH competency framework were assessed, alongside the value of service user involvement. Data was collected before, immediately after and 2 months after the training. Summary of Results 103 participants completed the training over 10 dates. Comparing confidence before and after the training, scores improved by between 15–28% in all 12 domains. 94% of participants graded the contributions of SUCs as either useful or very useful. These effects were sustained 2 months after the training. These effects were reflected in the qualitative feedback from participants. Qualitative feedback from participants identified an improvement in their knowledge as a result of the training, however it was not possible to demonstrate this statistically. Discussion and Conclusions This co-produced simulation based PMH programme increases confidence, knowledge and understanding amongst non-specialist health professionals from across the PMH care pathway on a number of domains aligned with the HEE perinatal MH competency framework. Participants were overwhelming in support of SUC involvement in the debriefing and noted that scenarios highly resembled real-life clinical encounters as a result. Providing SUCs with robust training, supervision and psychological support throughout the design and debriefing process is essential to the effectiveness and sustainability of the programme.
对共同制作的基于模拟的围产期心理健康(PMH)方案的评估
背景:英国国民保健服务体系心理健康长期计划的核心原则包括发展PMH服务和与有实际服务经验的人合作生产。患有PMH疾病的妇女通常首先向不是专家的临床医生提出。在评估和管理PMH疾病方面培训更广泛的工作人员是一项优先事项。在所有阶段与服务用户共同编制了模拟训练方案,包括汇报情况。三名服务用户顾问(suc)被聘为设计方案的教员。在一名精神病医生的陪同下,急救人员还接受了促进情景汇报的培训。定量和定性数据收集模拟参与者的信心和知识作为培训的结果。评估了与英格兰健康教育(HEE) PMH能力框架一致的12个领域,以及服务用户参与的价值。分别在训练前、训练后和训练后2个月采集数据。103名参与者在10天内完成了培训。对比训练前后的自信心,所有12个领域的得分都提高了15-28%。94%的参与者将suc的贡献评为有用或非常有用。这些效果在训练后持续了2个月。这些影响反映在参与者的定性反馈中。来自参与者的定性反馈确定了他们的知识作为培训的结果的改进,但是不可能在统计上证明这一点。讨论和结论这个共同制作的基于模拟的PMH计划增加了来自PMH护理途径的非专业卫生专业人员对与HEE围产期MH能力框架一致的许多领域的信心,知识和理解。与会者压倒性地支持SUC参与述职,并指出,因此,场景与现实生活中的临床遭遇非常相似。在整个设计和汇报过程中为suc提供强有力的培训、监督和心理支持,对方案的有效性和可持续性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信