{"title":"Aquinas against spiritual matter","authors":"T. Stępień","doi":"10.7408/EPKN.V6I2.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nature of angels have been the object of interest of Christian thinkers since the times of the Fathers of the Church when the teaching of Holy Scriptures was confronted with Late Ancient Philosophy. The teaching on the intellectual beings in noetic realm was very important especially for Neoplatonic philosophers. It was Plotinus who first used Aristotelian concept of hyle noete (intellectual mater) to describe the distinctions between spiritual beings. His opinions evolved at ancient Neoplatonic systems and found its place in Arabic and Jewish philosophy. Idea of intellectual matter took its fully developed form in the writings of Avicebron (Solomon ibn Gabirol). His work Fons vitae was early translated to Latin in twelve century and was widely read. Through this work much of Neoplatonic philosophy was transferred to Latin Europe along with the teaching on spiritual beings and spiritual matter. St Thomas Aquinas, who confronted his ideas building systematic angelology, also knew work of Avicebron. The main problem of Christian angelology at his time was to show the difference between the nature of angels and God. This distinction did not played the key role in pre-christian systems, because there was no Scripture like concept of the one God as the only creator who transcends all beings. For the medieval Christian thinkers the idea of spiritual mater seemed to be very helpful in resolving this issue. It allowed them to claim that angels as creatures had spiritual matter in their essences while God was pure form and pure act. St Thomas Aquinas explained this difference in unique way using his new metaphysics. He argues that God is subsistent act of being (ispum esse substitens) and angels do not have their own essence identical with their being. Spiritual beings (often called by him „separated substances”) are composed of act of being (ipsum esse) and essence, which is form (forma). Thanks to such explanation there is no need to claim that there is a spiritual matter in nature of angels and Aquinas formulates arguments refuting this idea. In De substantis separatis he shows that such solution allows to reject spiritual matter and helps to demonstrate that angels have purely spiritual nature. His approach to the problem also preserves the claim of fundamental difference between God and spiritual creatures.","PeriodicalId":40097,"journal":{"name":"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7408/EPKN.V6I2.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nature of angels have been the object of interest of Christian thinkers since the times of the Fathers of the Church when the teaching of Holy Scriptures was confronted with Late Ancient Philosophy. The teaching on the intellectual beings in noetic realm was very important especially for Neoplatonic philosophers. It was Plotinus who first used Aristotelian concept of hyle noete (intellectual mater) to describe the distinctions between spiritual beings. His opinions evolved at ancient Neoplatonic systems and found its place in Arabic and Jewish philosophy. Idea of intellectual matter took its fully developed form in the writings of Avicebron (Solomon ibn Gabirol). His work Fons vitae was early translated to Latin in twelve century and was widely read. Through this work much of Neoplatonic philosophy was transferred to Latin Europe along with the teaching on spiritual beings and spiritual matter. St Thomas Aquinas, who confronted his ideas building systematic angelology, also knew work of Avicebron. The main problem of Christian angelology at his time was to show the difference between the nature of angels and God. This distinction did not played the key role in pre-christian systems, because there was no Scripture like concept of the one God as the only creator who transcends all beings. For the medieval Christian thinkers the idea of spiritual mater seemed to be very helpful in resolving this issue. It allowed them to claim that angels as creatures had spiritual matter in their essences while God was pure form and pure act. St Thomas Aquinas explained this difference in unique way using his new metaphysics. He argues that God is subsistent act of being (ispum esse substitens) and angels do not have their own essence identical with their being. Spiritual beings (often called by him „separated substances”) are composed of act of being (ipsum esse) and essence, which is form (forma). Thanks to such explanation there is no need to claim that there is a spiritual matter in nature of angels and Aquinas formulates arguments refuting this idea. In De substantis separatis he shows that such solution allows to reject spiritual matter and helps to demonstrate that angels have purely spiritual nature. His approach to the problem also preserves the claim of fundamental difference between God and spiritual creatures.
天使的本性一直是基督教思想家感兴趣的对象,因为教会的教父,当圣经的教学面临着晚期古代哲学。在精神领域的知识分子的教学是非常重要的,特别是对新柏拉图主义哲学家。是普罗提诺第一个用亚里士多德的概念来描述精神存在之间的区别。他的观点从古代新柏拉图主义体系演变而来,并在阿拉伯和犹太哲学中找到了自己的位置。知识物质的观念在阿维伯仑(所罗门·伊本·加比罗尔)的著作中得到了充分发展。他的著作《生命之路》早在12世纪就被翻译成拉丁文,广为流传。通过这项工作,许多新柏拉图主义哲学连同关于精神存在和精神物质的教学一起被转移到拉丁欧洲。圣托马斯·阿奎那,谁面对他的想法建立系统天使学,也知道Avicebron的工作。在他的时代,基督教天使学的主要问题是显示天使和上帝的本质之间的区别。在基督教之前的系统中,这种区别并没有发挥关键作用,因为没有像圣经那样的概念,即唯一的上帝是超越所有生物的唯一创造者。对于中世纪的基督教思想家来说,精神物质的概念似乎对解决这个问题很有帮助。它允许他们声称天使作为生物在本质上有精神物质,而上帝是纯粹的形式和纯粹的行为。圣托马斯·阿奎那用他的新形而上学以独特的方式解释了这种差异。他认为上帝是存在的存在行为(ispum esse substitens),天使没有自己的本质与他们的存在相同。精神存在(常被他称为“分离的物质”)是由存在的行为(ipsum esse)和本质(forma)组成的。由于这样的解释,没有必要声称天使的本质中有精神物质,阿奎那提出了反驳这一观点的论点。在《论物质的分离》中,他表明,这种解决方案允许拒绝精神物质,并有助于证明天使具有纯粹的精神本性。他对这个问题的处理方法也保留了上帝和精神生物之间根本区别的主张。