Dopamine Alters the Effect of Brain Stimulation on Decision-Making

Li-Ann Leow, Anjeli Marcos, Esteban Nielsen, David K. Sewell, Tim Ballard, P. Dux, H. Filmer
{"title":"Dopamine Alters the Effect of Brain Stimulation on Decision-Making","authors":"Li-Ann Leow, Anjeli Marcos, Esteban Nielsen, David K. Sewell, Tim Ballard, P. Dux, H. Filmer","doi":"10.1101/2023.06.05.543812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), show promise in treating a range of psychiatric and neurologic conditions. However, optimization of such applications requires a better understanding of how tDCS alters cognition and behavior. Existing evidence implicates dopamine in tDCS alterations of brain activity and plasticity; however, there is as yet no causal evidence for a role of dopamine in tDCS effects on cognition and behavior. Here, in a preregistered, double-blinded study, we examined how pharmacologically manipulating dopamine altered the effect of tDCS on the speed–accuracy trade-off, which taps ubiquitous strategic operations. Cathodal tDCS was delivered over the left prefrontal cortex and the superior medial frontal cortex before participants (N = 62, 24 males, 38 females) completed a dot-motion task, making judgments on the direction of a field of moving dots under instructions to emphasize speed, accuracy, or both. We leveraged computational modeling to uncover how our interventions altered latent decisional processes driving the speed–accuracy trade-off. We show that dopamine in combination with tDCS (but not tDCS alone nor dopamine alone) not only impaired decision accuracy but also impaired discriminability, which suggests that these manipulations altered the encoding or representation of discriminative evidence. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first direct evidence implicating dopamine in the way tDCS affects cognition and behavior. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT tDCS can improve cognitive and behavioral impairments in clinical conditions; however, a better understanding of its mechanisms is required to optimize future clinical applications. Here, using a pharmacological approach to manipulate brain dopamine levels in healthy adults, we demonstrate a role for dopamine in the effects of tDCS in the speed–accuracy trade-off, a strategic cognitive process ubiquitous in many contexts. In doing so, we provide direct evidence implicating dopamine in the way tDCS affects cognition and behavior.","PeriodicalId":22786,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"25 1","pages":"6909 - 6919"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.05.543812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), show promise in treating a range of psychiatric and neurologic conditions. However, optimization of such applications requires a better understanding of how tDCS alters cognition and behavior. Existing evidence implicates dopamine in tDCS alterations of brain activity and plasticity; however, there is as yet no causal evidence for a role of dopamine in tDCS effects on cognition and behavior. Here, in a preregistered, double-blinded study, we examined how pharmacologically manipulating dopamine altered the effect of tDCS on the speed–accuracy trade-off, which taps ubiquitous strategic operations. Cathodal tDCS was delivered over the left prefrontal cortex and the superior medial frontal cortex before participants (N = 62, 24 males, 38 females) completed a dot-motion task, making judgments on the direction of a field of moving dots under instructions to emphasize speed, accuracy, or both. We leveraged computational modeling to uncover how our interventions altered latent decisional processes driving the speed–accuracy trade-off. We show that dopamine in combination with tDCS (but not tDCS alone nor dopamine alone) not only impaired decision accuracy but also impaired discriminability, which suggests that these manipulations altered the encoding or representation of discriminative evidence. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first direct evidence implicating dopamine in the way tDCS affects cognition and behavior. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT tDCS can improve cognitive and behavioral impairments in clinical conditions; however, a better understanding of its mechanisms is required to optimize future clinical applications. Here, using a pharmacological approach to manipulate brain dopamine levels in healthy adults, we demonstrate a role for dopamine in the effects of tDCS in the speed–accuracy trade-off, a strategic cognitive process ubiquitous in many contexts. In doing so, we provide direct evidence implicating dopamine in the way tDCS affects cognition and behavior.
多巴胺改变大脑刺激对决策的影响
无创脑刺激技术,如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS),在治疗一系列精神和神经疾病方面显示出希望。然而,这类应用程序的优化需要更好地理解tDCS如何改变认知和行为。现有证据表明,多巴胺参与tDCS对大脑活动和可塑性的改变;然而,目前还没有因果证据表明多巴胺在tDCS对认知和行为的影响中所起的作用。这里,在一项预先注册的双盲研究中,我们研究了如何从药理学上操纵多巴胺改变tDCS对速度-准确性权衡的影响,这种权衡利用了无处不在的战略操作。在参与者(N = 62, 24名男性,38名女性)完成点运动任务之前,在强调速度、准确性或两者同时强调的指令下,对移动点场的方向做出判断之前,在左侧前额叶皮层和上内侧额叶皮层上进行阴极tDCS。我们利用计算建模来揭示我们的干预如何改变潜在的决策过程,从而推动速度和准确性的权衡。我们发现多巴胺与tDCS联合使用(但不是单独使用tDCS或单独使用多巴胺)不仅会损害决策准确性,还会损害判别性,这表明这些操作改变了判别性证据的编码或表示。据我们所知,这是第一个直接证据表明多巴胺在tDCS影响认知和行为的方式。意义声明tDCS可改善临床认知和行为障碍;然而,为了优化未来的临床应用,需要更好地了解其机制。在这里,我们使用药理学方法来操纵健康成人的大脑多巴胺水平,我们证明了多巴胺在tDCS在速度-准确性权衡中的作用,这是一个在许多情况下普遍存在的战略性认知过程。在这样做的过程中,我们提供了直接证据,表明多巴胺在tDCS影响认知和行为的方式中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信