{"title":"Topographical problem areas in the delimitation of maritime boundaries and their political relevance: Case studies from the Western Caribbean","authors":"Gerhard Sandner, Beate Ratter","doi":"10.1016/0951-8312(91)90022-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prolongation of land boundaries into the sea becomes very complicated where the boundary is defined by the mouths of large rivers with considerable change in coastal development. The cases of the boundaries Honduras-Nicaragua (Río Coco) and Nicaragua-Costa Rica (Río San Juan) are used to point out difficulties in applying definitions and concepts of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea to this specific situation. The third case refers to the Nicaraguan Rise, where many cays, banks, reefs and islands represent serious problems of definition in the context of maritime delimitation. The persisting lack of detailed studies at the local scale, including historical change and coastal dynamics, is overruled by nationalistic territorial policies which intensify boundary disputes and conflict potential. This requires a combination of topographical, geomorphological and historical studies with conflict research which includes the political performance of the actors and its relation to ‘national’ interests, public opinion and consciousness of the maritime dimension of territory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100978,"journal":{"name":"Ocean and Shoreline Management","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 289-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0951-8312(91)90022-T","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean and Shoreline Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095183129190022T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The prolongation of land boundaries into the sea becomes very complicated where the boundary is defined by the mouths of large rivers with considerable change in coastal development. The cases of the boundaries Honduras-Nicaragua (Río Coco) and Nicaragua-Costa Rica (Río San Juan) are used to point out difficulties in applying definitions and concepts of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea to this specific situation. The third case refers to the Nicaraguan Rise, where many cays, banks, reefs and islands represent serious problems of definition in the context of maritime delimitation. The persisting lack of detailed studies at the local scale, including historical change and coastal dynamics, is overruled by nationalistic territorial policies which intensify boundary disputes and conflict potential. This requires a combination of topographical, geomorphological and historical studies with conflict research which includes the political performance of the actors and its relation to ‘national’ interests, public opinion and consciousness of the maritime dimension of territory.
陆地边界向海洋的延伸变得非常复杂,边界是由沿海发展变化很大的大河的河口确定的。以洪都拉斯-尼加拉瓜(Río Coco)和尼加拉瓜-哥斯达黎加(Río San Juan)边界为例,指出将《联合国海洋法公约》的定义和概念适用于这一具体情况的困难。第三种情况是尼加拉瓜隆起,那里的许多礁石、河岸、礁石和岛屿在海洋划界方面构成了严重的定义问题。在地方尺度上持续缺乏详细的研究,包括历史变化和沿海动态,这被民族主义的领土政策所推翻,这些政策加剧了边界争端和冲突的可能性。这需要将地形、地貌学和历史研究与冲突研究相结合,其中包括行动者的政治表现及其与“国家”利益、公众舆论和领土海洋层面意识的关系。