Critical review of fossil record of Ranina Lamarck, 1801 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Raninidae), with description of Tethyranina n. gen.

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Giovanni Pasini, A. Garassino
{"title":"Critical review of fossil record of Ranina Lamarck, 1801 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Raninidae), with description of Tethyranina n. gen.","authors":"Giovanni Pasini, A. Garassino","doi":"10.4081/NHS.2018.359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pasini and Garassino (2017a) revised the fossil record referred to Ranina Lamarck, 1801 by Karasawa et al. (2014). As result only four species were considered as possible valid species within Ranina: R. palmea E. Sismonda, 1846, R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011, R. propinqua Ristori, 1891, and R. ranina (Linnaeus, 1758). These species are herein revised and discussed, based on updated observations and critical review of the fossil materials and on a re-definition of the main diagnostic proxy characters sensu Schweitzer (2003) of the type species R. ranina (Linnaeus, 1758). This review allows us to establish that R. ranina from the middle Pleistocene of Ryukyu Islands (Japan) and R. palmea from the middle Miocene of Italy have consistent proxy characters with the extant Ranina to be considered as valid species within the genus. Moreover, Tethyranina n. gen., with T. propinqua (Ristori, 1891) n. comb., is herein proposed to accommodate this questionable fossil species previously assigned to Ranina. Finally R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011, lacking the typical characters of Ranina, is considered as a doubtful species within Ranininae.","PeriodicalId":52358,"journal":{"name":"Natural History Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural History Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/NHS.2018.359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Pasini and Garassino (2017a) revised the fossil record referred to Ranina Lamarck, 1801 by Karasawa et al. (2014). As result only four species were considered as possible valid species within Ranina: R. palmea E. Sismonda, 1846, R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011, R. propinqua Ristori, 1891, and R. ranina (Linnaeus, 1758). These species are herein revised and discussed, based on updated observations and critical review of the fossil materials and on a re-definition of the main diagnostic proxy characters sensu Schweitzer (2003) of the type species R. ranina (Linnaeus, 1758). This review allows us to establish that R. ranina from the middle Pleistocene of Ryukyu Islands (Japan) and R. palmea from the middle Miocene of Italy have consistent proxy characters with the extant Ranina to be considered as valid species within the genus. Moreover, Tethyranina n. gen., with T. propinqua (Ristori, 1891) n. comb., is herein proposed to accommodate this questionable fossil species previously assigned to Ranina. Finally R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011, lacking the typical characters of Ranina, is considered as a doubtful species within Ranininae.
Ranina Lamarck, 1801(十足目,短肢目,raninae)化石记录评述及对Tethyranina n. gen的描述。
Pasini和Garassino (2017a)修订了Karasawa et al.(2014)在1801年引用的Ranina Lamarck的化石记录。结果表明,仅有4种被认为可能存在于Ranina中:R. palmea E. Sismonda(1846)、R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin(2011)、R. propinqua Ristori(1891)和R. Ranina (Linnaeus, 1758)。本文根据最新的观测结果和对化石材料的批判性评述,以及对模式种r.r ranina (Linnaeus, 1758)的主要诊断代理特征(sensu Schweitzer(2003))的重新定义,对这些物种进行了修订和讨论。本研究表明,来自日本琉球群岛中更新世和意大利中中新世的rina和R. palmea与现存的rina具有一致的代理特征,可作为该属内的有效种。此外,Tethyranina n. gen.,与T. propinqua (Ristori, 1891) n. comb.。在此建议容纳这个可疑的化石物种以前分配给拉尼娜。最后,R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011,由于缺乏拉尼娜的典型特征,被认为是拉尼娜科中的一个可疑种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural History Sciences
Natural History Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信