{"title":"Critical review of fossil record of Ranina Lamarck, 1801 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Raninidae), with description of Tethyranina n. gen.","authors":"Giovanni Pasini, A. Garassino","doi":"10.4081/NHS.2018.359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pasini and Garassino (2017a) revised the fossil record referred to Ranina Lamarck, 1801 by Karasawa et al. (2014). As result only four species were considered as possible valid species within Ranina: R. palmea E. Sismonda, 1846, R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011, R. propinqua Ristori, 1891, and R. ranina (Linnaeus, 1758). These species are herein revised and discussed, based on updated observations and critical review of the fossil materials and on a re-definition of the main diagnostic proxy characters sensu Schweitzer (2003) of the type species R. ranina (Linnaeus, 1758). This review allows us to establish that R. ranina from the middle Pleistocene of Ryukyu Islands (Japan) and R. palmea from the middle Miocene of Italy have consistent proxy characters with the extant Ranina to be considered as valid species within the genus. Moreover, Tethyranina n. gen., with T. propinqua (Ristori, 1891) n. comb., is herein proposed to accommodate this questionable fossil species previously assigned to Ranina. Finally R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011, lacking the typical characters of Ranina, is considered as a doubtful species within Ranininae.","PeriodicalId":52358,"journal":{"name":"Natural History Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural History Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/NHS.2018.359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Pasini and Garassino (2017a) revised the fossil record referred to Ranina Lamarck, 1801 by Karasawa et al. (2014). As result only four species were considered as possible valid species within Ranina: R. palmea E. Sismonda, 1846, R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011, R. propinqua Ristori, 1891, and R. ranina (Linnaeus, 1758). These species are herein revised and discussed, based on updated observations and critical review of the fossil materials and on a re-definition of the main diagnostic proxy characters sensu Schweitzer (2003) of the type species R. ranina (Linnaeus, 1758). This review allows us to establish that R. ranina from the middle Pleistocene of Ryukyu Islands (Japan) and R. palmea from the middle Miocene of Italy have consistent proxy characters with the extant Ranina to be considered as valid species within the genus. Moreover, Tethyranina n. gen., with T. propinqua (Ristori, 1891) n. comb., is herein proposed to accommodate this questionable fossil species previously assigned to Ranina. Finally R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011, lacking the typical characters of Ranina, is considered as a doubtful species within Ranininae.
Ranina Lamarck, 1801(十足目,短肢目,raninae)化石记录评述及对Tethyranina n. gen的描述。
Pasini和Garassino (2017a)修订了Karasawa et al.(2014)在1801年引用的Ranina Lamarck的化石记录。结果表明,仅有4种被认为可能存在于Ranina中:R. palmea E. Sismonda(1846)、R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin(2011)、R. propinqua Ristori(1891)和R. Ranina (Linnaeus, 1758)。本文根据最新的观测结果和对化石材料的批判性评述,以及对模式种r.r ranina (Linnaeus, 1758)的主要诊断代理特征(sensu Schweitzer(2003))的重新定义,对这些物种进行了修订和讨论。本研究表明,来自日本琉球群岛中更新世和意大利中中新世的rina和R. palmea与现存的rina具有一致的代理特征,可作为该属内的有效种。此外,Tethyranina n. gen.,与T. propinqua (Ristori, 1891) n. comb.。在此建议容纳这个可疑的化石物种以前分配给拉尼娜。最后,R. pellattieroi De Angeli and Beschin, 2011,由于缺乏拉尼娜的典型特征,被认为是拉尼娜科中的一个可疑种。