High Flow in the Storm. Early Administration of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with Severe Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure Due to Clinically Suspected COVID-19

SPG biomed Pub Date : 2021-12-03 DOI:10.3390/biomed1020012
S. Jimeno, M. Gomez, P. Ventura, Ángeles Calle, Elena Núñez, J. Castellano, Alejandro López-Escobar
{"title":"High Flow in the Storm. Early Administration of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with Severe Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure Due to Clinically Suspected COVID-19","authors":"S. Jimeno, M. Gomez, P. Ventura, Ángeles Calle, Elena Núñez, J. Castellano, Alejandro López-Escobar","doi":"10.3390/biomed1020012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has created a shortage of ICU beds and ventilators. The objective was to assess whether administration of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 averted mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: Prospective observational study performed at Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur (Madrid). The protocol included early administration of HFNC in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients with progressive desaturation. Results: Twenty patients were started on respiratory support with HFNC. Hospital admission took place after a median of 7 days since symptom onset and clinical deterioration was apparent at 9 days after symptom onset. Anti-inflammatory treatment with methylprednisolone and tocilizumab was initiated at 9 days (6.5–12), followed by HFNC at 9.5 days (7–12). HFNC was maintained for an average of 4.5 days (2.8–6.3), was successful in eighteen patients (90%), as defined by not needing invasive MV, and failed in two cases (10%) resulting in death. Since HFNC was implemented, there has been a decrease in the number of patients admitted to the ICU and treated with MV for acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Conclusions: HFNC administration may represent a viable therapeutic option for patients in the early stages of severe respiratory failure due to clinically suspected COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":93816,"journal":{"name":"SPG biomed","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPG biomed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed1020012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has created a shortage of ICU beds and ventilators. The objective was to assess whether administration of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 averted mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: Prospective observational study performed at Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur (Madrid). The protocol included early administration of HFNC in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients with progressive desaturation. Results: Twenty patients were started on respiratory support with HFNC. Hospital admission took place after a median of 7 days since symptom onset and clinical deterioration was apparent at 9 days after symptom onset. Anti-inflammatory treatment with methylprednisolone and tocilizumab was initiated at 9 days (6.5–12), followed by HFNC at 9.5 days (7–12). HFNC was maintained for an average of 4.5 days (2.8–6.3), was successful in eighteen patients (90%), as defined by not needing invasive MV, and failed in two cases (10%) resulting in death. Since HFNC was implemented, there has been a decrease in the number of patients admitted to the ICU and treated with MV for acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Conclusions: HFNC administration may represent a viable therapeutic option for patients in the early stages of severe respiratory failure due to clinically suspected COVID-19.
风暴中的高流量。临床疑似新冠肺炎所致严重急性缺氧呼吸衰竭患者早期高流量鼻插管的应用
背景:全球COVID-19大流行造成了ICU床位和呼吸机的短缺。目的是评估高流量鼻插管(HFNC)是否适用于因COVID-19引起的急性缺氧呼吸衰竭患者避免机械通气(MV)。方法:在马德里国立大学医院进行前瞻性观察研究。该方案包括对临床疑似COVID-19进行性去饱和患者早期给予HFNC。结果:20例患者开始使用HFNC进行呼吸支持。患者在症状出现后中位数为7天后入院,在症状出现后第9天出现明显的临床恶化。在第9天(6.5-12)开始使用甲基强的松龙和托珠单抗进行抗炎治疗,在第9.5天(7-12)开始使用HFNC。HFNC平均维持4.5天(2.8-6.3天),18例(90%)患者成功,不需要侵入性MV, 2例(10%)患者失败,导致死亡。自HFNC实施以来,因急性缺氧性呼吸衰竭而入住ICU并接受MV治疗的患者数量有所减少。结论:对于临床疑似COVID-19导致的早期严重呼吸衰竭患者,给药HFNC可能是一种可行的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信