The Importance of Integrating Subsurface Disciplines with Machine Learning when Predicting and Optimizing Well Performance – Case Study from the Spirit River Formation

J. Hirschmiller, A. Biryukov, B. Groulx, Brian Emmerson, Scott Quinell
{"title":"The Importance of Integrating Subsurface Disciplines with Machine Learning when Predicting and Optimizing Well Performance – Case Study from the Spirit River Formation","authors":"J. Hirschmiller, A. Biryukov, B. Groulx, Brian Emmerson, Scott Quinell","doi":"10.2118/196089-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This machine learning study incorporates geoscience and engineering data to characterize which geological, reservoir and completion data contribute most significantly to well production performance. A better understanding of the key factors that predict well performance is essential in assessing the commercial viability of exploration and development, in the optimization of capital spending to increase rates of return, and in reserve and resource evaluations.\n Machine learning models provide an objective, analytical means to interpret large, complex datasets. Generally, such models demand large databases of consistently evaluated data. As geological data is interpretive, often varying from one geologist to another, or from one pool to another, it can be difficult to incorporate geological data into regional machine learning models. Consequently, efforts to use machine learning in the oil and gas industry to predict well performance are often focused exclusively on engineering completion technology. However, this case study has utilized a regional geological Spirit River database with consistent petrophysical evaluation methodology across the entire play. This geological database is complemented with public completion and fracture data and production data to build predictive models using inputs from all subsurface disciplines.\n Redundancies in the data were identified and removed. Features explaining a significant proportion of the variance in production were also removed if their effect was captured by more fundamental, correlated features that were more straightforward to interpret. The dataset was distilled to 13 key features providing predictions with a similar precision to those obtained using the full-featured dataset.\n The thirteen features in this case study are a combination of geological, reservoir and completion data, underlining that an approach integrating both geoscience and engineering data is vital to predicting and optimizing well performance accurately for future wells.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196089-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This machine learning study incorporates geoscience and engineering data to characterize which geological, reservoir and completion data contribute most significantly to well production performance. A better understanding of the key factors that predict well performance is essential in assessing the commercial viability of exploration and development, in the optimization of capital spending to increase rates of return, and in reserve and resource evaluations. Machine learning models provide an objective, analytical means to interpret large, complex datasets. Generally, such models demand large databases of consistently evaluated data. As geological data is interpretive, often varying from one geologist to another, or from one pool to another, it can be difficult to incorporate geological data into regional machine learning models. Consequently, efforts to use machine learning in the oil and gas industry to predict well performance are often focused exclusively on engineering completion technology. However, this case study has utilized a regional geological Spirit River database with consistent petrophysical evaluation methodology across the entire play. This geological database is complemented with public completion and fracture data and production data to build predictive models using inputs from all subsurface disciplines. Redundancies in the data were identified and removed. Features explaining a significant proportion of the variance in production were also removed if their effect was captured by more fundamental, correlated features that were more straightforward to interpret. The dataset was distilled to 13 key features providing predictions with a similar precision to those obtained using the full-featured dataset. The thirteen features in this case study are a combination of geological, reservoir and completion data, underlining that an approach integrating both geoscience and engineering data is vital to predicting and optimizing well performance accurately for future wells.
在预测和优化油井性能时,将地下学科与机器学习相结合的重要性——以Spirit River地层为例
该机器学习研究结合了地球科学和工程数据,以确定哪些地质、储层和完井数据对油井生产性能贡献最大。更好地了解预测油井性能的关键因素对于评估勘探和开发的商业可行性、优化资本支出以提高回报率以及储量和资源评估至关重要。机器学习模型提供了一种客观的分析方法来解释大型复杂的数据集。一般来说,这样的模型需要大型数据库,其中包含一致评估的数据。由于地质数据是解释性的,不同的地质学家或不同的油藏之间的地质数据往往不同,因此很难将地质数据整合到区域机器学习模型中。因此,在油气行业中使用机器学习来预测井况的努力通常只集中在工程完井技术上。然而,本案例研究利用了Spirit River区域地质数据库,并在整个区块采用了一致的岩石物理评价方法。该地质数据库与公共完井和压裂数据以及生产数据相辅相成,利用所有地下学科的输入建立预测模型。识别并删除了数据中的冗余。如果它们的影响被更基本的、更容易解释的相关特征所捕获,那么解释生产中显著比例差异的特征也会被删除。该数据集被提炼为13个关键特征,提供与使用全功能数据集获得的预测精度相似的预测。本案例研究的13个特征是地质、储层和完井数据的组合,强调了将地球科学和工程数据结合起来的方法对于准确预测和优化未来井的性能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信