Interdisciplinary Analysis of Science Communication on Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis

Thomas Mandl, S. Jaki, Hannah Mitera, Franziska Schmidt
{"title":"Interdisciplinary Analysis of Science Communication on Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis","authors":"Thomas Mandl, S. Jaki, Hannah Mitera, Franziska Schmidt","doi":"10.3390/knowledge3010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In times of crisis, science communication needs to be accessible and convincing. In order to understand whether these two criteria apply to concrete science communication formats, it is not enough to merely study the communication product. Instead, the recipient’s perspective also needs to be taken into account. What do recipients value in popular science communication formats concerning COVID-19? What do they criticize? What elements in the formats do they pay attention to? These questions can be answered by reception studies, for example, by analyzing the reactions and comments of social media users. This is particularly relevant since scientific information was increasingly disseminated over social media channels during the COVID-19 crisis. This interdisciplinary study, therefore, focuses both on science communication strategies in media formats and the related comments on social media. First, we selected science communication channels on YouTube and performed a qualitative multi-modal analysis. Second, the comments responding to science communication content online were analyzed by identifying Twitter users who are doctors, researchers, science communicators and those who represent research institutes and then, subsequently, performing topic modeling on the textual data. The main goal was to find topics that directly related to science communication strategies. The qualitative video analysis revealed, for example, a range of strategies for accessible communication and maintaining transparency about scientific insecurities. The quantitative Twitter analysis showed that few tweets commented on aspects of the communication strategies. These were mainly positive while the sentiment in the overall collection was less positive. We downloaded and processed replies for 20 months, starting at the beginning of the pandemic, which resulted in a collection of approximately one million tweets from the German science communication market.","PeriodicalId":74770,"journal":{"name":"Science of aging knowledge environment : SAGE KE","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of aging knowledge environment : SAGE KE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In times of crisis, science communication needs to be accessible and convincing. In order to understand whether these two criteria apply to concrete science communication formats, it is not enough to merely study the communication product. Instead, the recipient’s perspective also needs to be taken into account. What do recipients value in popular science communication formats concerning COVID-19? What do they criticize? What elements in the formats do they pay attention to? These questions can be answered by reception studies, for example, by analyzing the reactions and comments of social media users. This is particularly relevant since scientific information was increasingly disseminated over social media channels during the COVID-19 crisis. This interdisciplinary study, therefore, focuses both on science communication strategies in media formats and the related comments on social media. First, we selected science communication channels on YouTube and performed a qualitative multi-modal analysis. Second, the comments responding to science communication content online were analyzed by identifying Twitter users who are doctors, researchers, science communicators and those who represent research institutes and then, subsequently, performing topic modeling on the textual data. The main goal was to find topics that directly related to science communication strategies. The qualitative video analysis revealed, for example, a range of strategies for accessible communication and maintaining transparency about scientific insecurities. The quantitative Twitter analysis showed that few tweets commented on aspects of the communication strategies. These were mainly positive while the sentiment in the overall collection was less positive. We downloaded and processed replies for 20 months, starting at the beginning of the pandemic, which resulted in a collection of approximately one million tweets from the German science communication market.
新冠肺炎危机中社交媒体科学传播的跨学科分析
在危机时期,科学传播需要易于理解和令人信服。为了了解这两个标准是否适用于具体的科学传播形式,仅仅研究传播产品是不够的。相反,接受者的观点也需要考虑进去。关于COVID-19的科普传播形式,受众看重什么?他们批评什么?他们关注格式中的哪些元素?这些问题可以通过接受研究来回答,例如,通过分析社交媒体用户的反应和评论。这一点尤其重要,因为在2019冠状病毒病危机期间,科学信息越来越多地通过社交媒体渠道传播。因此,这项跨学科的研究既关注媒体形式下的科学传播策略,也关注社交媒体上的相关评论。首先,我们选择了YouTube上的科学传播频道,并进行了定性的多模态分析。其次,通过识别医生、研究人员、科学传播者和代表研究机构的Twitter用户,对在线科学传播内容的评论进行分析,然后对文本数据进行主题建模。主要目标是寻找与科学传播策略直接相关的主题。例如,定性视频分析揭示了一系列便于交流和保持科学不安全感透明度的策略。定量推特分析显示,很少有推文评论了传播策略的各个方面。这些主要是积极的,而整体收集的情绪不太积极。从大流行开始,我们下载并处理了20个月的回复,结果收集了来自德国科学传播市场的大约100万条推文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信