Editorial overview: contextualized mentoring models: from theory to practice

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
N. Templeton, S. Jeong, Elsa G. Villarreal
{"title":"Editorial overview: contextualized mentoring models: from theory to practice","authors":"N. Templeton, S. Jeong, Elsa G. Villarreal","doi":"10.1080/13611267.2022.2044705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue of Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning Journal includes reported research on formal and informal mentoring strategies from scholars representing New York and New Jersey in the United States, as well as Australia, Ghana, United Arab Emirates, New Zealand, and Canada. The authors critically examine the extent to which mentoring practices, perhaps better described as mentoring perspectives, align with mentoring theories. To situate the narratives perhaps better, it is first prudent to understand the differences between formal and informal mentoring. Formal mentoring formal is predominantly associated with career support, while informal mentoring is typically associated with psychological support. While the synthesis of emergent literature on formal versus informal mentoring is less discerning and often differs by discipline, Irby, Abdelrahman, Lara-Alecio, and Allen (2020) posit that formal mentoring is structured, whereby more experienced individuals (mentors) are carefully selected to distribute skills and knowledge to lesser-experienced individuals or groups (mentees). Alternatively, informal mentoring is often more organic and interactive, such that the relationship between two people is centered on gaining insight, knowledge, and support from each other (Irby, 2008). Irrespective of the type or model of mentoring, transferring experiences and understandings is a developmental and fluid process; one that often requires immense determination and sacrifice. The collective research within this issue explores different mentoring perspectives; from faculty-mentored undergraduate research, to mentoring preservice teacher education interns, to the efficacy of mentoring programs in the tenure and promotion process, to student-led peer mentoring. While influenced by context and purpose, the theoretical undergirding of each manuscript creates a funneled lens by which the reader is drawn into a lucid experience that bridges the gap between theory and practice. The Editorial Board of Mentoring & Tutoring invites more contributions to the literature that further advances the building of capacity through mentoring in all facets of professional practice. In the lead article, Student Teachers and their Mentors: Differing Perspectives of the Mentoring Experience During Initial Teacher Training in Ghana, Kuyini, Abukari and Abubakari, guided by the framework of mentor as role model, explored MENTORING & TUTORING: PARTNERSHIP IN LEARNING 2022, VOL. 30, NO. 1, 1–5 https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2044705","PeriodicalId":46613,"journal":{"name":"MENTORING & TUTORING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MENTORING & TUTORING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2044705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This issue of Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning Journal includes reported research on formal and informal mentoring strategies from scholars representing New York and New Jersey in the United States, as well as Australia, Ghana, United Arab Emirates, New Zealand, and Canada. The authors critically examine the extent to which mentoring practices, perhaps better described as mentoring perspectives, align with mentoring theories. To situate the narratives perhaps better, it is first prudent to understand the differences between formal and informal mentoring. Formal mentoring formal is predominantly associated with career support, while informal mentoring is typically associated with psychological support. While the synthesis of emergent literature on formal versus informal mentoring is less discerning and often differs by discipline, Irby, Abdelrahman, Lara-Alecio, and Allen (2020) posit that formal mentoring is structured, whereby more experienced individuals (mentors) are carefully selected to distribute skills and knowledge to lesser-experienced individuals or groups (mentees). Alternatively, informal mentoring is often more organic and interactive, such that the relationship between two people is centered on gaining insight, knowledge, and support from each other (Irby, 2008). Irrespective of the type or model of mentoring, transferring experiences and understandings is a developmental and fluid process; one that often requires immense determination and sacrifice. The collective research within this issue explores different mentoring perspectives; from faculty-mentored undergraduate research, to mentoring preservice teacher education interns, to the efficacy of mentoring programs in the tenure and promotion process, to student-led peer mentoring. While influenced by context and purpose, the theoretical undergirding of each manuscript creates a funneled lens by which the reader is drawn into a lucid experience that bridges the gap between theory and practice. The Editorial Board of Mentoring & Tutoring invites more contributions to the literature that further advances the building of capacity through mentoring in all facets of professional practice. In the lead article, Student Teachers and their Mentors: Differing Perspectives of the Mentoring Experience During Initial Teacher Training in Ghana, Kuyini, Abukari and Abubakari, guided by the framework of mentor as role model, explored MENTORING & TUTORING: PARTNERSHIP IN LEARNING 2022, VOL. 30, NO. 1, 1–5 https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2044705
编辑概述:情境化师徒模式:从理论到实践
本期《指导与辅导:学习中的伙伴关系》杂志包括来自美国纽约和新泽西以及澳大利亚、加纳、阿拉伯联合酋长国、新西兰和加拿大的学者对正式和非正式指导策略的研究报告。作者批判性地检查了指导实践的程度,也许更好地描述为指导视角,与指导理论相一致。为了更好地定位叙述,首先要谨慎地理解正式和非正式指导之间的差异。正式的指导主要与职业支持有关,而非正式的指导通常与心理支持有关。虽然关于正式与非正式指导的新兴文献的综合不太清晰,而且往往因学科而不同,但Irby、Abdelrahman、Lara-Alecio和Allen(2020)认为,正式指导是结构化的,即精心挑选更有经验的个人(导师),将技能和知识分发给经验较少的个人或团体(学员)。另外,非正式的指导通常是更有机和互动的,这样两个人之间的关系就集中在获得洞察力、知识和相互支持上(Irby, 2008)。无论指导的类型或模式如何,经验和理解的传递是一个发展和流动的过程;这往往需要巨大的决心和牺牲。本课题的集体研究探讨了不同的师徒视角;从教师指导的本科生研究,到指导职前教师教育实习生,到指导计划在任期和晋升过程中的功效,再到学生主导的同伴指导。虽然受上下文和目的的影响,每个手稿的理论基础创造了一个漏斗透镜,读者被吸引到一个清晰的经验,弥合理论与实践之间的差距。《辅导与辅导》编委会诚邀更多有关通过专业实践各方面的辅导进一步推进能力建设的文献投稿。在第一篇文章《实习教师及其导师:加纳、库伊尼、阿布卡里和阿布巴卡里初任教师培训期间的辅导经验的不同视角》中,以导师为榜样的框架为指导,探讨了《指导与辅导:学习中的伙伴关系》,第30卷,第2022期。1,1 - 5 https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2044705
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MENTORING & TUTORING
MENTORING & TUTORING EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信