Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy- A Safe treatment option for Gangrenous Cholecystitis 48 and Empyema Gallbladder in experienced hands

S. K. Mondal, Sharmistha Roy
{"title":"Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy- A Safe treatment option for Gangrenous Cholecystitis 48 and Empyema Gallbladder in experienced hands","authors":"S. K. Mondal, Sharmistha Roy","doi":"10.3329/jss.v19i2.43981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard of treatment for gall stone disease and in acute cholecystitis. But controversy persists regarding laparoscopic approach to gangrenous gallbladder and empyema gallbladder due to the risk of life threatening complications. We share our experience in a tertiary care multidisciplinary diabetic hospital where we encounter significant number of patients with empyema Gallbladder and gangrenous gallbladder because most of our patients are diabetic and hence immunocompromised. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of laparoscopic procedure for the treatment of empyema of gallbladder and gangrenous gallbladder in an experienced hand. \nMethods & Materials: Between January 2013 and January 2015 we performed 1191 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Empyema gallbladder and gangrenous gallbladder were found per operatively in 345 and 53 cases respectively.All were managed by laparoscopic procedure except two cases, where conversion to open cholecystectomy was needed. \nResult: The mean operating time was 72 minutes(45-100 minutes) in empyema gallbladder. In gangrenous cholecystitismean operating time was 80 minutes(60-100 minutes). Total number of patients (including empyema gallbladder 345 and gangrenous cholecystitis 53) were 398. Among them 52 patients (13%) had excessive bleeding(>100ml) from calot’s triangle or gallbladder bed in liver. Spillage of stones occurred in 28 patients (7%). 1 patient had common bile duct injury (.25%). Gallbladder retrieval was difficult in 71 patients (18%). In the post operative period 21 patient (5%) developed minor port infection in the umbilical port. 9 patients (2%) developed chest infection, and 1 patient (.25%) developed MI. 356 patients (89%) were discharged within 72 hours of surgery. \nConclusions: Innovative technique, appropriate instruments, knowledge about the possible risks and way to manage them, with expertise in intracorporeal suturing and knotting are an essential pre requisites to attempt these cases. Operating time is more but post operative recovery is prompt. Hospital stay is significantly less than open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure in cases of Empyema and gangrenous gallbladder, provided the surgeon is experienced enough and has a low threshold to convert to open cholecystectomy at anypoint of time. \nJournal of Surgical Sciences (2015) Vol. 19 (2) : 48-51","PeriodicalId":33248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","volume":"2011 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v19i2.43981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard of treatment for gall stone disease and in acute cholecystitis. But controversy persists regarding laparoscopic approach to gangrenous gallbladder and empyema gallbladder due to the risk of life threatening complications. We share our experience in a tertiary care multidisciplinary diabetic hospital where we encounter significant number of patients with empyema Gallbladder and gangrenous gallbladder because most of our patients are diabetic and hence immunocompromised. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of laparoscopic procedure for the treatment of empyema of gallbladder and gangrenous gallbladder in an experienced hand. Methods & Materials: Between January 2013 and January 2015 we performed 1191 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Empyema gallbladder and gangrenous gallbladder were found per operatively in 345 and 53 cases respectively.All were managed by laparoscopic procedure except two cases, where conversion to open cholecystectomy was needed. Result: The mean operating time was 72 minutes(45-100 minutes) in empyema gallbladder. In gangrenous cholecystitismean operating time was 80 minutes(60-100 minutes). Total number of patients (including empyema gallbladder 345 and gangrenous cholecystitis 53) were 398. Among them 52 patients (13%) had excessive bleeding(>100ml) from calot’s triangle or gallbladder bed in liver. Spillage of stones occurred in 28 patients (7%). 1 patient had common bile duct injury (.25%). Gallbladder retrieval was difficult in 71 patients (18%). In the post operative period 21 patient (5%) developed minor port infection in the umbilical port. 9 patients (2%) developed chest infection, and 1 patient (.25%) developed MI. 356 patients (89%) were discharged within 72 hours of surgery. Conclusions: Innovative technique, appropriate instruments, knowledge about the possible risks and way to manage them, with expertise in intracorporeal suturing and knotting are an essential pre requisites to attempt these cases. Operating time is more but post operative recovery is prompt. Hospital stay is significantly less than open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure in cases of Empyema and gangrenous gallbladder, provided the surgeon is experienced enough and has a low threshold to convert to open cholecystectomy at anypoint of time. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2015) Vol. 19 (2) : 48-51
腹腔镜胆囊切除术-经验丰富的人对坏疽性胆囊炎和胆囊脓肿的安全治疗选择
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术已成为治疗胆结石疾病和急性胆囊炎的金标准。但由于危及生命的并发症风险,腹腔镜下坏疽性胆囊和胆囊脓肿的手术方法仍存在争议。我们分享我们在一家三级护理的多学科糖尿病医院的经验,在那里我们遇到了大量的胆囊脓肿和坏疽性胆囊患者,因为我们的大多数患者是糖尿病患者,因此免疫功能低下。本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜手术治疗胆囊脓肿和坏疽性胆囊的安全性。方法与材料:2013年1月至2015年1月共行腹腔镜胆囊切除术1191例。术中发现胆囊脓肿345例,坏疽53例。除2例需要转开腹胆囊切除术外,所有病例均行腹腔镜手术。结果:胆囊脓胸平均手术时间72分钟(45 ~ 100分钟)。坏疽性胆囊炎平均手术时间80分钟(60 ~ 100分钟)。其中胆囊脓肿345例,坏疽性胆囊炎53例,共398例。其中52例(13%)出现肝内卡洛三角或胆囊床出血(>100ml)。28例(7%)发生结石溢出。胆总管损伤1例(0.25%)。71例(18%)患者胆囊取出困难。术后21例(5%)出现脐口轻微感染。9例(2%)患者发生胸部感染,1例(0.25%)患者发生心肌梗死,356例(89%)患者在手术72小时内出院。结论:创新的技术,合适的器械,对可能的风险和管理方法的了解,以及体内缝合和打结的专业知识是尝试这些病例的必要先决条件。手术时间较长,但术后恢复迅速。住院时间明显少于开腹胆囊切除术。腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种安全的手术,在脓胸和坏疽胆囊的情况下,只要外科医生有足够的经验,并且在任何时候都有较低的阈值来转换为开放胆囊切除术。外科杂志(2015)Vol. 19 (2): 48-51
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信