A Holistic Study on Performance Evaluation of Horizontal Wells and its Implications on Tight Spacing Drilling Strategy in Mauddud Reservoir

L. Konwar, Bader Alhammadi, Ebrahim Alawainati, Ajithkumar Panicker
{"title":"A Holistic Study on Performance Evaluation of Horizontal Wells and its Implications on Tight Spacing Drilling Strategy in Mauddud Reservoir","authors":"L. Konwar, Bader Alhammadi, Ebrahim Alawainati, Ajithkumar Panicker","doi":"10.2118/207972-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of this paper is to present the comparative results of comprehensive analysis of horizontal well productivity and completion performance with vertical wells drilled and completed within same time window in the Mauddud reservoir in the Bahrain Oil Field. The study also focuses on performance evaluation of horizontal wells drilled in different areas of the field. Key reservoir risks and uncertainties associated with horizontal wells are identified, and contingency and mitigation plans are devised to address them. Besides controlling gas production, the benefits of using cemented horizontal wells over vertical wells are highlighted based on performance of recently completed workovers and economic evaluation.\n Reservoir and well performance are analyzed using a variety of analytical techniques such as well productivity index (PI), productivity improvement factor (PIF), normalized productivity improvement factor (PIFn), well productivity coefficient (Cwp), in conjunction with a statistical distribution function to reflect the average and most likely values. In addition, average oil/gas/water production, cumulative production, reserves, and estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) are compared for both vertical and horizontal wells using decline curve analysis. Furthermore, economics are evaluated for tight spacing drilling with vertical wells, as well as horizontal cemented wells, to optimize future development of Mauddud reservoir.\n Based on the evaluation, it is inferred that the average horizontal well outperforms a vertical well in terms of production rate, PI, PIF, reserves, and EUR in the field except in waterflood areas. Based on average cumulative oil, reserves and EUR, and well productivity coefficient, overall performance of horizontal wells are better in the GI area in comparison their counterparts in the North/South areas of the Mauddud reservoir, where the dominant mechanism is strong water drive. High gas and water production in horizontal wells are attributed to open-hole completions of the wells and the possibility of poor cementing. A trial has been completed recently in a few horizontal wells using cased-hole cemented completion with selected perforations, resulting in improved oil rates and the drastic reduction of gas to oil ratio. Furthermore, two new cased-hole cemented horizontal wells are planned in 2021 as a trial. A detailed cost-benefit analysis using a net present value concept is performed, leading to a rethink of future development strategies with a mix of both vertical as well as horizontal wells in the GI area.\n Using the dimensionless correlations and distribution functions, the productivity and PIF of new horizontal wells to be drilled in any area can be predicted during early prognosis given the values of average reservoir permeability, well length, and fluid properties. This study can be used as a benchmark for the development of a thin oil column with a large and expanding gas cap under crestal gas injection using both vertical and horizontal wells.","PeriodicalId":10967,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207972-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to present the comparative results of comprehensive analysis of horizontal well productivity and completion performance with vertical wells drilled and completed within same time window in the Mauddud reservoir in the Bahrain Oil Field. The study also focuses on performance evaluation of horizontal wells drilled in different areas of the field. Key reservoir risks and uncertainties associated with horizontal wells are identified, and contingency and mitigation plans are devised to address them. Besides controlling gas production, the benefits of using cemented horizontal wells over vertical wells are highlighted based on performance of recently completed workovers and economic evaluation. Reservoir and well performance are analyzed using a variety of analytical techniques such as well productivity index (PI), productivity improvement factor (PIF), normalized productivity improvement factor (PIFn), well productivity coefficient (Cwp), in conjunction with a statistical distribution function to reflect the average and most likely values. In addition, average oil/gas/water production, cumulative production, reserves, and estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) are compared for both vertical and horizontal wells using decline curve analysis. Furthermore, economics are evaluated for tight spacing drilling with vertical wells, as well as horizontal cemented wells, to optimize future development of Mauddud reservoir. Based on the evaluation, it is inferred that the average horizontal well outperforms a vertical well in terms of production rate, PI, PIF, reserves, and EUR in the field except in waterflood areas. Based on average cumulative oil, reserves and EUR, and well productivity coefficient, overall performance of horizontal wells are better in the GI area in comparison their counterparts in the North/South areas of the Mauddud reservoir, where the dominant mechanism is strong water drive. High gas and water production in horizontal wells are attributed to open-hole completions of the wells and the possibility of poor cementing. A trial has been completed recently in a few horizontal wells using cased-hole cemented completion with selected perforations, resulting in improved oil rates and the drastic reduction of gas to oil ratio. Furthermore, two new cased-hole cemented horizontal wells are planned in 2021 as a trial. A detailed cost-benefit analysis using a net present value concept is performed, leading to a rethink of future development strategies with a mix of both vertical as well as horizontal wells in the GI area. Using the dimensionless correlations and distribution functions, the productivity and PIF of new horizontal wells to be drilled in any area can be predicted during early prognosis given the values of average reservoir permeability, well length, and fluid properties. This study can be used as a benchmark for the development of a thin oil column with a large and expanding gas cap under crestal gas injection using both vertical and horizontal wells.
毛杜德油藏水平井动态综合评价及其对致密钻井策略的启示
本文的目的是对巴林油田Mauddud油藏同一时间窗内钻完的水平井产能和完井性能与直井进行综合分析的对比结果。研究还重点对油田不同区域的水平井进行了性能评价。识别与水平井相关的主要油藏风险和不确定性,并制定应急和缓解计划来解决这些问题。除了控制产气量外,根据最近完成的修井作业和经济评估,强调了使用胶结水平井优于直井的好处。利用各种分析技术,如油井产能指数(PI)、产能提高系数(PIF)、标准化产能提高系数(PIFn)、油井产能系数(Cwp),结合统计分布函数来分析油藏和油井的动态,以反映平均值和最可能的值。此外,通过递减曲线分析,比较了直井和水平井的平均油/气/水产量、累计产量、储量和估计最终采收率(EUR)。此外,为了优化Mauddud油藏的未来开发,还对直井和水平胶结井的致密钻井进行了经济性评估。根据评价,除注水区域外,水平井在产量、PI、PIF、储量和EUR等方面均优于直井。从平均累计产油量、储量、EUR和井产能系数来看,GI区水平井总体表现优于Mauddud油藏北、南两区水平井,其主要机制为强水驱。水平井的高产气、高产水是由于裸眼完井和固井不良的可能性。最近在几口水平井中完成了一项试验,采用套管井胶结完井,选择了一些射孔,提高了产油率,显著降低了气油比。此外,计划在2021年试验两口新的套管井胶结水平井。使用净现值概念进行了详细的成本效益分析,从而重新思考GI地区的未来开发策略,包括垂直井和水平井的组合。利用无因次相关函数和分布函数,可以根据平均储层渗透率、井长、流体性质等参数,在早期预测中预测任意地区新钻水平井的产能和PIF。该研究结果可作为垂、水平井在顶注条件下开发气顶较大且不断扩大的薄油柱的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信