{"title":"Effects of Social Distancing on the Incidence of Traumatic Injuries","authors":"J. Duchesne, S. Ninokawa, K. Nordham, D. Tatum","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ab s t r Ac t Aim: To understand how social distancing orders impact the incidence of traumatic injuries. Background: In an attempt to blunt the spread of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, social distancing and stay home orders have been enforced. Here we analyze the effect that these public health measures have had on the rate of traumatic injury presenting to a level 1 trauma center. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the number of trauma patients presenting to a level I trauma center from January 2019 through April 2020. Patients were identified using an institutional trauma registry and include trauma transfers, trauma activations, and admitted trauma patients. The independent samples t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used to assess differences between groups. Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests were used to assess normality and variances, respectively. Results: When comparing daily admissions in 2020 before and after social distancing orders, there was a significant reduction in the median daily number of trauma patients (12 vs 8.5; p < 0.0001) after the social distancing order was put into place. Additionally, there was a significant decrease in the mean number of weekly trauma patients presenting to our hospital in 2020 before and after social distancing orders (86.1 vs 60.3; p < 0.0001). When looking at weekly patient counts, there was a significant reduction in blunt trauma patients when comparing preand post-social distancing (56.6 vs 35.7; p < 0.01). However, there was no change in the number of weekly penetrating injuries (17.0 vs 17.1). Conclusion: Social distancing orders have significantly reduced the number of blunt trauma patients presenting to our level 1 trauma center. Further studies will be needed to determine long-term effects of these measures.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"2013 1","pages":"122-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Ab s t r Ac t Aim: To understand how social distancing orders impact the incidence of traumatic injuries. Background: In an attempt to blunt the spread of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, social distancing and stay home orders have been enforced. Here we analyze the effect that these public health measures have had on the rate of traumatic injury presenting to a level 1 trauma center. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the number of trauma patients presenting to a level I trauma center from January 2019 through April 2020. Patients were identified using an institutional trauma registry and include trauma transfers, trauma activations, and admitted trauma patients. The independent samples t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used to assess differences between groups. Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests were used to assess normality and variances, respectively. Results: When comparing daily admissions in 2020 before and after social distancing orders, there was a significant reduction in the median daily number of trauma patients (12 vs 8.5; p < 0.0001) after the social distancing order was put into place. Additionally, there was a significant decrease in the mean number of weekly trauma patients presenting to our hospital in 2020 before and after social distancing orders (86.1 vs 60.3; p < 0.0001). When looking at weekly patient counts, there was a significant reduction in blunt trauma patients when comparing preand post-social distancing (56.6 vs 35.7; p < 0.01). However, there was no change in the number of weekly penetrating injuries (17.0 vs 17.1). Conclusion: Social distancing orders have significantly reduced the number of blunt trauma patients presenting to our level 1 trauma center. Further studies will be needed to determine long-term effects of these measures.
目的:了解社交距离令对创伤性损伤发生率的影响。背景:为了遏制新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2的传播,政府实施了保持社交距离和居家令。在这里,我们分析了这些公共卫生措施对到一级创伤中心就诊的创伤性损伤率的影响。材料和方法:这是对2019年1月至2020年4月在一级创伤中心就诊的创伤患者数量的回顾性分析。使用机构创伤登记处识别患者,包括创伤转移,创伤激活和入院的创伤患者。采用独立样本t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验评估组间差异。夏皮罗-威尔克检验和莱文检验分别用于评估正态性和方差。结果:当比较2020年社交距离令实施前后的每日入院人数时,每日创伤患者中位数显著减少(12 vs 8.5;P < 0.0001)。此外,在社交距离令实施前后,2020年每周到我院就诊的创伤患者平均人数显著减少(86.1 vs 60.3;P < 0.0001)。在观察每周患者数量时,在比较社交距离前和社交距离后,钝性创伤患者的数量显著减少(56.6 vs 35.7;P < 0.01)。然而,每周穿透伤的数量没有变化(17.0 vs 17.1)。结论:保持社交距离的命令显著减少了到我们一级创伤中心就诊的钝性创伤患者的数量。需要进一步的研究来确定这些措施的长期影响。