On freedom, being and transcendence: the quest for relevance in higher education

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Catarina Gomes
{"title":"On freedom, being and transcendence: the quest for relevance in higher education","authors":"Catarina Gomes","doi":"10.17159/2309-9585/2017/V43A5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In spite of an extreme diversity in terms of institutional designs, political environment and economic predicaments, the global landscape of higher education systems nowadays faces common trends that raise a number of perplexities and reframe the idea and the practice of the university. Those same trends compel us to analyse the university’s contemporary challenges and conundrums, especially in terms of its social function and the core issue of its existence: critical thinking and intellectual freedom. Thus, central to this endeavour is questioning what critical thinking and intellectual freedom are, as well as what both imply in terms of educational practices and knowledge production. Quite beyond their market-oriented usefulness, the exercise of critical thinking and intellectual freedom might be best understood as the foundational condition for avoiding coercive normalisation, that is, the tools through which individuals and communities can sustain democratic control over institutions and exercise critical and conscious choices around identity matters and what futures to build. In this sense it is argued that critical thinking – itself an experience of freedom – should be translated into forms of transcendence through which historical limits imposed on individuals and communities can be challenged. The conundrum is to assess, in present-day conditions, how the university can pursue and defend critical thinking and intellectual freedom.","PeriodicalId":53088,"journal":{"name":"Kronos","volume":"2011 1","pages":"78-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kronos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-9585/2017/V43A5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In spite of an extreme diversity in terms of institutional designs, political environment and economic predicaments, the global landscape of higher education systems nowadays faces common trends that raise a number of perplexities and reframe the idea and the practice of the university. Those same trends compel us to analyse the university’s contemporary challenges and conundrums, especially in terms of its social function and the core issue of its existence: critical thinking and intellectual freedom. Thus, central to this endeavour is questioning what critical thinking and intellectual freedom are, as well as what both imply in terms of educational practices and knowledge production. Quite beyond their market-oriented usefulness, the exercise of critical thinking and intellectual freedom might be best understood as the foundational condition for avoiding coercive normalisation, that is, the tools through which individuals and communities can sustain democratic control over institutions and exercise critical and conscious choices around identity matters and what futures to build. In this sense it is argued that critical thinking – itself an experience of freedom – should be translated into forms of transcendence through which historical limits imposed on individuals and communities can be challenged. The conundrum is to assess, in present-day conditions, how the university can pursue and defend critical thinking and intellectual freedom.
论自由、存在与超越:高等教育对相关性的追求
尽管在制度设计、政治环境和经济困境方面存在着极大的差异,但当今全球高等教育体系的格局面临着共同的趋势,这些趋势引发了许多困惑,并重新构建了大学的理念和实践。这些趋势迫使我们分析牛津大学在当代面临的挑战和难题,尤其是在其社会功能和存在的核心问题:批判性思维和知识自由方面。因此,这一努力的核心是质疑什么是批判性思维和知识自由,以及两者在教育实践和知识生产方面的含义。除了以市场为导向的有用性之外,批判性思维和知识自由的实践可能最好被理解为避免强制性正常化的基本条件,即个人和社区能够通过这些工具维持对机构的民主控制,并围绕身份问题和未来建设进行批判性和有意识的选择。从这个意义上说,人们认为批判性思维——它本身就是一种自由的体验——应该被转化为超越的形式,通过这种形式,可以挑战强加于个人和社区的历史限制。难题在于,在当前条件下,大学如何追求和捍卫批判性思维和知识自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kronos
Kronos Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信