Drug usage evaluation of antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired pneumonia

J. M. Radford, L. Cardiff, P. Pillans, D. Fielding, D. Looke
{"title":"Drug usage evaluation of antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired pneumonia","authors":"J. M. Radford, L. Cardiff, P. Pillans, D. Fielding, D. Looke","doi":"10.1002/JPPR1999296317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To review antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) at the Princess Alexandra Hospital and compare management with institutional guidelines. Method: Clinical pharmacists prospectively reviewed 100 patients with a diagnosis of CAP during a five-week period in August and September 1998. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from patient records and assessed for compliance with institutional guidelines for the appropriate management of CAP. For the purposes of these guidelines, pneumonia severity was defined according to the clinical condition of the patient and their inherent risk factors. Results: Ninety-nine patients (99%) were prescribed an antibiotic for the treatment of CAP. Ninety-six patients were prescribed parenteral antibiotics for a mean of 7 days (range 0-27 days, median 6 days). Seventy-six patients were prescribed oral therapy for a mean duration of 10 days (range 3-21 days, median 9 days). Only 11 of 41 patients (27%) with severe pneumonia received IV erythromycin. Thirteen of 28 patients (46%) diagnosed with mild-moderate pneumonia were inappropriately treated with broad-spectrum parenteral agents. Only 45% of patients were treated appropriately. Thirty-three positive sputum cultures were reported (from 54 specimens) and four patients returned more than one isolate. Fourteen per cent of the patients admitted with CAP died during their admission. Conclusions: Community-acquired pneumonia is a major cause of death due to infection. This study showed an under-utilisation of parenteral antibiotics for severe pneumonia and an overuse of broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics for moderate pneumonia without co-morbidities. New pneumonia management guidelines have been developed and a further review was recently undertaken in an attempt to reduce inappropriate management of CAP within our institution.","PeriodicalId":22283,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"2013 1","pages":"317-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/JPPR1999296317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Aim: To review antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) at the Princess Alexandra Hospital and compare management with institutional guidelines. Method: Clinical pharmacists prospectively reviewed 100 patients with a diagnosis of CAP during a five-week period in August and September 1998. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from patient records and assessed for compliance with institutional guidelines for the appropriate management of CAP. For the purposes of these guidelines, pneumonia severity was defined according to the clinical condition of the patient and their inherent risk factors. Results: Ninety-nine patients (99%) were prescribed an antibiotic for the treatment of CAP. Ninety-six patients were prescribed parenteral antibiotics for a mean of 7 days (range 0-27 days, median 6 days). Seventy-six patients were prescribed oral therapy for a mean duration of 10 days (range 3-21 days, median 9 days). Only 11 of 41 patients (27%) with severe pneumonia received IV erythromycin. Thirteen of 28 patients (46%) diagnosed with mild-moderate pneumonia were inappropriately treated with broad-spectrum parenteral agents. Only 45% of patients were treated appropriately. Thirty-three positive sputum cultures were reported (from 54 specimens) and four patients returned more than one isolate. Fourteen per cent of the patients admitted with CAP died during their admission. Conclusions: Community-acquired pneumonia is a major cause of death due to infection. This study showed an under-utilisation of parenteral antibiotics for severe pneumonia and an overuse of broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics for moderate pneumonia without co-morbidities. New pneumonia management guidelines have been developed and a further review was recently undertaken in an attempt to reduce inappropriate management of CAP within our institution.
社区获得性肺炎抗菌药物治疗的用药评价
目的:回顾亚历山德拉公主医院社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的抗菌治疗,并与机构指南进行比较。方法:临床药师对1998年8月至9月间诊断为CAP的100例患者进行回顾性分析。从患者记录中收集临床和实验室数据,并评估其是否符合CAP适当管理的机构指南。为了这些指南的目的,根据患者的临床状况及其固有危险因素定义肺炎严重程度。结果:99例(99%)患者使用抗生素治疗CAP。96例患者使用肠外抗生素治疗,平均时间为7天(范围0-27天,中位数6天)。76例患者接受口服治疗,平均持续时间为10天(范围3-21天,中位9天)。41例重症肺炎患者中只有11例(27%)接受了静脉注射红霉素。诊断为轻中度肺炎的28例患者中有13例(46%)使用广谱肠外药物治疗不当。只有45%的患者得到了适当的治疗。报告了33例痰培养阳性(来自54份标本),4例患者返回不止一株分离物。14%的CAP患者在入院期间死亡。结论:社区获得性肺炎是感染死亡的主要原因。该研究显示,严重肺炎的肠外抗生素使用不足,而无合并症的中度肺炎则过度使用广谱肠外抗生素。我们已经制定了新的肺炎管理指南,并在最近进行了进一步的审查,试图减少我们机构内对CAP的不当管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信